Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T05:14:42.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flexible magnetics on plastic substrates: magnetic lithography, magnetic nanostructures and other applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Z. Z. Bandić
Affiliation:
Hitachi San Jose Research Center, 650 Harry Rd., San Jose, CA 95120
T.R. Albrecht
Affiliation:
Hitachi San Jose Research Center, 650 Harry Rd., San Jose, CA 95120
C. Bonhote
Affiliation:
Hitachi San Jose Research Center, 650 Harry Rd., San Jose, CA 95120
J. Katine
Affiliation:
Hitachi San Jose Research Center, 650 Harry Rd., San Jose, CA 95120
M. Rooks
Affiliation:
IBM Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Rd., Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

Flexible Magnetics encompases the design, fabrication and characterization of magnetic devices and systems built on thin flexible substrates. Although device and system functionality is magnetic in nature, flexible magnetics draws interesting parallels to flexible electronics, especially in the challenge of fabrication on plastic substrates. Some of those challenges include substrate surface quality and maximum processing temperature, tooling issues related to mechanical properties of flexible substrates, adhesion of thin films deposited on plastics, as well as thermal stability of fabricated devices.

One application of flexible magnetics relevant to the information storage industry is magnetic lithography. Magnetic lithography is a process qualitatively analogous to contact optical lithography. Magnetic lithography transfers information from a patterned magnetic mask (analogous to the optical photomask) to magnetic media (analog of the photoresist), and is interesting for applications in rapid, parallel magnetic recording. The magnetic mask consists of patterned magnetically soft material (FeNiCo, FeCo) on a thin flexible plastic substrate, typically Polyethylene Teraphtalate (PET) or polyimide. When uniformly magnetized media is brought into intimate contact with the magnetic mask, an externally applied magnetic field selectively changes the magnetic orientation in the areas not covered with the soft magnetic material. The flexible magnetic mask offers superior compliance to contaminated or nonplanar magnetic media. We discuss nanofabrication challenges of magnetic masks on plastic substrates, including electron beam lithography, electroplating and lift-off processing on the nanometer scale, adhesion of metal thin films on PET and polyimide substrate, and release of plastic films from the rigid substrates used during the processing. We present results on fabricated magnetic masks, and magnetic force microscopy images of the magnetic transition patterns.

Besides fabrication of magnetic nanostructures and devices on plastic substrates, we also present our results on nanoscale patterning of plastic thin film. We will present our results on fabrication of sub-100 nm scale nanochannels in polyimide films, as well as self-assembly of ordered arrays of polyimide nanodots. Nanoscale patterned plastic films are interesting for the potential application in magnetic lithography, as well as for the application in micro- and nanofluidics, due to the mechanical flexibility and biological inertness of plastic materials. We will discuss interesting biosensing systems that may result from the combination of magnetic functionality, electronic control and patterned nanofludic channels on plastic substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bernard, W.R., Buslik, W.S., US pat. 3,869,711Google Scholar
[2] Bandić, Z.Z., Xu, H., Albrecht, T.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 147 (2003).Google Scholar
[3] Bandic, Z.Z., Xu, H., Baglin, J.E.E., and Albrecht, T.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 769, 227 (2003).Google Scholar
[4] Bandić, Z.Z., Hsu, Y., Xu, H., Albrecht, T.R., IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 2231 (2003).Google Scholar
[5] Tanaka, S., Imai, Y., Morita, O., Dericotte, D., Kurokawa, K., Kashiwagi, T., and Takino, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. 30, 4209 (1994).Google Scholar
[6] Terris, B.D., Folks, L., Weller, D., Baglin, J.E.E., Kellock, A.J., Rothuizen, H. and Vettiger, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 403 (1999).Google Scholar
[7] Dietzel, A., Berger, R., Grimm, H., Bruenger, W.H., Dzionk, C., Letzkus, F., Springer, R., Loeschner, H., Platzgummer, E., Stengl, G., Bandić, Z.Z., and Terris, B.D., IEEE Trans. Magn. 38, (2002).Google Scholar
[8] Saito, A., Yonezawa, E., Takano, Y., and Watanabe, T., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 8688 (2002).Google Scholar
[9] Xu, H., Dinan, T.E., Cooper, E.I., Romankiw, L.T., Bonhote, C., and Miller, D., Proc. of the Electrochem. Soc., PV 2001-8.Google Scholar
[10] Baglin, J.E.E., Intreface Design for Thin Film Adhesion, Fundamentals of Adhesion, ed. by Lee, L-H., Plenum Publ. Corp., 13 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] Kim, K-S. and Kim, J., Trans. ASME 110, 266 (1988).Google Scholar
[12] Austin, R.H., Tegenfeldt, J.O., Cao, H., Chou, S.Y., and Cox, E.C., IEEE Trans. Nanotech. 1, 12 (2002).Google Scholar
[13] Bustamante, C., Macosko, J.C., and Wuite, G.J.L., Nature Reviews 1, 130 (2000).Google Scholar
[14] Garcia, P.F., McLean, R.S., Reilly, M.H., and Nunes, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1117 (2003).Google Scholar