Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T13:07:18.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A semipolar (10-1-3) InGaN/GaN green light emitting diode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Rajat Sharma
Affiliation:
rajat@engineering.ucsb.edu, University of California, Santa Barbara, Materials Department, Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States, 805-893-5078
P Morgan Pattison
Affiliation:
pattison@engineering.ucsb.edu
Troy J Baker
Affiliation:
tjb@engineering.ucsb.edu
Benjamin A Haskell
Affiliation:
bhaskell@engineering.ucsb.edu
Robert M Farrell
Affiliation:
rmf@engineering.ucsb.edu
Hisashi Masui
Affiliation:
masui@engineering.ucsb.edu
Feng Wu
Affiliation:
fwu@mrl.ucsb.edu
Steven P DenBaars
Affiliation:
denbaars@engineering.ucsb.edu
James S Speck
Affiliation:
speck@mrl.ucsb.edu
Shuji Nakamura
Affiliation:
shuji@engineering.ucsb.edu
Get access

Abstract

The performance of conventional c-plane GaN-based optoelectronic devices suffers from the effects of strong polarization-induced electric fields along the conduction direction, which result in a reduced overlap between electron and hole wavefunctions. These devices consequently demonstrate low radiative recombination rates, and a blue-shift in peak emission wavelength with increasing bias. There have been several recent demonstrations of light emitting diodes (LEDs) fabricated on non-polar a- and m- plane GaN that show greatly reduced to zero blue-shift of peak emission wavelength, and other recent work on non-polar GaN has yielded hole concentrations that are almost an order of magnitude higher than for c-plane GaN.

The effects of the strong polarization-induced electric fields may, conceivably, also be mitigated or potentially eliminated by growing films on so-called ‘semipolar’ planes. A semipolar plane is any plane that may not be classified as a c-, a- or m- plane, and has at least two non-zero h, i, or k Miller indices and a nonzero l Miller index (, and planes, for example). It is expected that devices grown on these semipolar planes should also demonstrate a reduced blue-shift in peak emission wavelength and higher hole concentrations. Further, recent work also suggests that the indium incorporation efficiency for growth on semipolar planes is comparable to that for growth on the c-plane.

We demonstrate the first green InGaN/GaN LED grown on a planar semipolar GaN template. The LED structure is grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), and the 20 μm-thick, specular and optically transparent template is grown by hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE). The fabricated devices have a peak emission wavelength of ∼525 nm and demonstrate rectifying behavior, with a low turn-on voltage of 3.2 V. We observe a small ∼7 nm blue-shift in the peak emission wavelength during electroluminescence measurements, over the range 20 to 250 mA. We also see an almost linear increase in the output power from 5 mA to 200 mA, with no appreciable decrease in the external quantum efficiency over the same range. We also observe evidence of polarization anisotropy in the emission from the semipolar green LEDs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Takeuchi, T., Sota, S., Katsuragawa, M., Komori, M., Takeuchi, H., Amano, H., and Akasaki, I., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 36, L382 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Lefebvre, P., Morel, A., Gallart, M., Taliercio, T., Allegre, J., Gil, B., Mathieu, H., Damilano, B., Grandjean, N., and Massies, J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 78, 1252 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Grandjean, N., Damilano, B., Dalmasso, S., Leroux, M., Laugt, M., and Massies, J., J. Appl. Phys., 86, 3714 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chakraborty, A., Haskell, B. A., Keller, S., Speck, J. S., DenBaars, S. P., Nakamura, S., and Mishra, U. K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 85, 5143 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chakraborty, A., Haskell, B. A., Keller, S., Speck, J. S., DenBaars, S. P., Nakamura, S., and Mishra, U. K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 44, L173 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Chitnis, A., Chen, C., Adivarahan, V., Shatalov, M., Kuokstis, E., Mandavilli, V., Yang, J., and Khan, M. A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 3663 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gardner, N. F., Kim, J. C., Wierer, J. J., Shen, Y. C., and Krames, M. R., Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 111101 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. McLaurin, M., Mates, T. E. and Speck, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 262104 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Park, S. H. and Chuang, S. L., Phys. Rev. B, 59, 4725 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Park, S. H., J. Appl. Phys., 91, 9904 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Baker, T. J., Haskell, B. A., Wu, F., Fini, P. T., Speck, J. S. and Nakamura, S., submitted to Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (2005)Google Scholar