Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T10:03:04.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Changes in 238Pu-Substituted Zirconolite on Recovery from the Metamict State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

F. W. Clinard Jr.
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
R. J. Livak
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
L. W. Hobbs
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
D. L. Rohr
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Get access

Abstract

238Pu-substituted zirconolite (CaPuTi2O7) was held at ≈350 K for a time sufficient to allow self-irradiation damage to convert the material to the metamict condition. Samples were then stored at 875 K, while dimensional and microstructural changes were monitored by dilatometry and transmission electron microscopy. Densification proceeded sporadically over a period of ≈400 days, attaining a final value of 4 vol% as a result of crystallization. The material was found to be friable at an intermediate stage of recovery, apparently as a result of internal strains. Evidence is presented that CaPuTi2O7 can exist in more than one metamict state, depending on extent of prior damage and thermal history.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Ware, N.G., Hibberson, W.O., Major, A., Geochem. J. 13, 141 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Reeve, K.D. and Woolfrey, J.L., J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 16, 229 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Clinard, F.W. Jr., Peterson, D.E., Rohr, D.L., Hobbs, L.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 126, 245 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Weber, W.J., Wald, J.W., Matzke, Hj., in: Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings Vol.44, edited by C.M., Jantzen, J.A., Stone, and R.C., Ewing (Materials Research Society, Pittsburg, 1985) (in press).Google Scholar
5. Headley, T.J., Arnold, G.W., Northrup, C.J.M., in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, edited by W., Lutze (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1982) p. 379.Google Scholar
6. Sinclair, W. and Ringwood, A.E., Geochem. J. 15, 229 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Clinard, F.W. Jr., Tucker, D.S., Hurley, G.F., Kise, C.D., Rankin, J., op. cit. ref. 4.Google Scholar
8. Foltyn, E.M., Clinard, F.W. Jr. Rankin, J., Peterson, D.E., J. Nucl. Mater. (in press).Google Scholar
9. Wald, J.W. and Offermann, P., op. cit. ref. 5.Google Scholar
10. Ewing, R.C., Haaker, R.F., Headley, T.J., Hlava, P.F., in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, edited by S.V., Topp (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1982) pp. 249256.Google Scholar
11. Routbort, J.L., Offermann, P., Matzke, Hj., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings Vol.15, edited by D.G., Brookins (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1983) pp. 415422.Google Scholar
12. Greegor, R.B., Lytle, F.W., Ewing, R.C., Haaker, R.F., Nucl. Instrum. and Methods B1, 587 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Rossell, H.J., Nature 283, 282 (1980).Google Scholar