Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T20:39:52.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Macroeconomic Record of the Coalition Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Simon Wren-Lewis*
Affiliation:
Oxford University, Blavatnik School of Government

Abstract

This paper examines the outcomes for changes introduced by the UK Coalition government in 2010. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is generally regarded as a success, and should become a permanent part of fiscal policymaking. The form of the primary fiscal mandate, involving a five-year rolling target, appears to be a sensible way to shape fiscal decisions when monetary policy is able to stabilise the economy. Unfortunately it was introduced, along with a five-year programme of severe fiscal consolidation (austerity), while the economy was in a liquidity trap. The OBR estimates austerity reduced GDP growth by 1 per cent in both 2010–11 and 2011–12, and monetary policy was unable to offset this. For the Liberal Democrats a misreading of the Eurozone crisis may have been responsible for this mistake, but for the Conservatives this mistake appears to derive from an unconventional view that the liquidity trap is unimportant.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Giles Wilkes and Simon Kirby for valuable comments, but responsibility for the end result is entirely mine.

References

Alesina, A. and Ardagna, S. (2009), ‘Large changes in fiscal policy: taxes versus spending’, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Paper No. 15438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagaria, N., Holland, D. and van Reenen, J. (2012) ‘Fiscal consolidation during a depression’, National Institute Economic Review, 221, pp. F4254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, B. (2012), ‘Deleveraging’, Speech 15th March, Bank of England.Google Scholar
Calmfors, L. and Wren-Lewis, S. (2011), ‘What should fiscal councils do?’, Economic Policy, 26, pp. 649–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grauwe, P. (2011), ‘The European Central Bank as a lender of last resort’, VoxEU 18/08/11, or (2011), ‘The management of a fragile Eurozone’, Working Paper, CEPS, April.Google Scholar
DeLong, J.B. and Summers, L.H. (2012), ‘Fiscal policy in a depressed economy’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, pp. 233–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertson, G.B. and Woodford, M. (2003), ‘The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, 34(1), pp. 139235.Google Scholar
Frankel, J.A. and Schreger, J. (2013), ‘Over-optimistic official forecasts and fiscal rules in the Eurozone’, Review of World Economics, 149, 2, pp. 247–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF (2009), ‘What's the damage? Medium term output dynamics after financial crises’, World Economic Outlook, October, pp. 121–51.Google Scholar
IMF Independent Evaluation Office (2014), ‘IMF response to the financial and economic crisis’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorda, O. and Taylor, A.M. (2013), ‘The time for austerity: estimating the average treatment effect of fiscal policy’, NBER Working Paper No. 19414.Google Scholar
Kirsanova, T., Leith, C. and Wren-Lewis, S. (2009), ‘Monetary and fiscal policy interaction: the current consensus assignment in the light of recent developments’, Economic Journal, 119, pp. F482F496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (1998), ‘It's baaack! Japan's slump and the return of the liquidity trap’, BPEA, 2: 1998, pp. 137–87.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2014), ‘Currency regimes, capital flows and crises’, IMF Economic Review, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessoa, J.P. and Van Reenen, J. (2013), ‘The UK productivity and jobs puzzle: does the answer lie in labour market flexibility?’, C.E.P. Special Paper No.31.Google Scholar
Portes, J. and Wren-Lewis, S. (2014), ‘Issues in the design of fiscal policy rules’, Oxford Economics Department Discussion Paper No. 704 and NIESR Discussion Paper No. 11865.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2012), ‘Methods of policy accommodation at the interest-rate lower bound’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S. (1996), ‘Avoiding fiscal fudge’, New Economy, 3, pp 128132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S. (2013a), ‘Comparing the delegation of monetary and fiscal policy’, in Kopits, G. (ed.), Restoring Public Debt Sustainability, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S. (2013b), ‘Aggregate fiscal policy under the Labour government, 1997–2010’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29, pp. 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S.Mainly macro blogposts. (A) 10/07/13 (B) 05/08/14 (C) 05/03/13.Google Scholar