Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T21:55:33.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-thinking Truth: Assessing Heidegger's critique of Aquinas in light of Vallicella's critique of Heidegger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jonathan Lyonhart Open the ORCID record for Jonathan Lyonhart [Opens in a new window]
Jonathan Lyonhart*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Cambridge
*
jdl60@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Heidegger's critique of Aquinas on truth must be seen in light of Vallicella's critique of Heidegger. Heidegger criticized Aquinas for allegedly placing truth in the ‘subjectivity’ of the human mind via correspondence (adequatio). While the accuracy of this reading of Aquinas is highly contested, the criticism itself has sometimes been turned back upon Heidegger. In three forgotten articles in the 1980s, William Vallicella contended that Heidegger reduces Being to truth, and truth to the alleged ‘subjectivity’ of Dasein. Though Vallicella garnered some minimal attention at the time, his argument was soon forgotten, along with its potential implications for Heidegger's criticism of Aquinas. This paper will first establish the nature of Heidegger's critique of Aquinas, followed by Vallicella's critique of Heidegger, evaluating the former in light of the latter. It will be shown that Heidegger critiques Thomas for a mistake he does not make, then makes that same mistake himself, only to retreat to a position similar to what Thomas actually holds, but in a way that solves nothing, for he lacks Thomas’ anchor in a divine mind. These points will coalesce in the ultimate conclusion that Vallicella can be used to both undermine Heidegger's critique and undergird the value of Aquinas’ position on truth.

Keywords

HeideggerAquinasTruthVallicellaIdealismCorrespondence
Type
Original Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 103 , Issue 1105 , May 2022 , pp. 326 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas. De Veritate trans. Mulligan, Robert W.. H. Regnery Co., 1952.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Metaphysics trans. Ross, W. D.. NuVision Publications, 2009.Google Scholar
Blattner, William D. Heidegger's Temporal Idealism, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Caputo, John D. Heidegger and Aquinas: an Essay on Overcoming Metaphysics. Fordham University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. Heidegger's Concept of Truth. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. Being and Some Philosophers. 2nd Edition. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1952.Google Scholar
Haar, Michel, et al. The Song of the Earth: Heidegger and the Grounds of the History of Being. Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Introduction to Phenomenological Research trans. Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Indiana University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time trans. Stambaugh, Joan. State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Logic: The Question of Truth trans. Sheehan, Martin. Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Janicaud, Dominique. Phenomenology and the Theological Turn. Fordham University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kerr, Fergus. “In Matters of Truth: Heidegger and Aquinas.” Contemplating Aquinas: on the Varieties of Interpretation, University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Knasas, John. “A Heideggerian Critique of Aquinas and a Gilsonian Reply.” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, vol. 58, no. 3, 1994, pp. 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman, and Stump, Eleonore. “Philosophy of Mind.” The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Paul A. Knowledge and the Transcendent: An Inquiry Into the Mind's Relationship to God. Catholic University of America Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. God without Being. TPB, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. Heidegger and Being and Time. Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. On Being-in-the-world. Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: toward a More Perfect from of Existence. University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Orr, James. “Heidegger's Critique of Aquinas on Truth: A Critical Assessment.” New Blackfriars, vol. 95, no. 1055, 2013, pp. 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John. “God as Truth.” Faith and Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, 1995, pp. 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham. “Where Is Philosophy at the Start of the Twenty-First Century?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 103, no. 1, 2002, pp. 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham. Towards Non-Being: the Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford UP, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritzl, Kurt. Truth: Studies of a Robust Presence. Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sadler, Ted. “Chapter II; Truth, Language and Logic.” Heidegger and Aristotle: the Question of Being, Athlone, 1997.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. “Heidegger's Philosophy of Mind.” Philosophy of Mind, 1983, pp. 287–318.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. “On Movement and the Destruction of Ontology.” Monist, vol. 64, no. 4, 1981, pp. 534–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Smith, Quentin. “Reply to Vallicella.” International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 2, 1991, pp. 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallicella, William F. “Heidegger's Reduction of Being to Truth.” New Scholasticism, vol. 59, no. 2, 1985, pp. 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallicella, William F.. “Kant, Heidegger, and the Problem of the Thing in Itself.” International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 1, 1983, pp. 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallicella, William F.. “Reply to Zimmerman.” International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, 1990, pp. 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallicella, William F.. “The Problem of Being in the Early Heidegger.” The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, vol. 45, no. 3, 1981, pp. 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippel, John F. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas.” The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 43, no. 2, Dec. 1989, pp. 295–326.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark. Heidegger Reexamined. Routledge, Abingdon, 2002.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (1990). On Vallicella's Critique of Heidegger. International Philosophical Quarterly, 30(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar