No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Secularisation and Human Identity in Christ
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
The ability of Christian discourse to give people a sense of their identity sustains the concrete church. The cultural revolt of the 1960s which suddenly weakened the power of discursive Christianity in Britain may be partially explained in terms of the deterritorializing power of capitalism. In the context of this deterritorialization the formation of self-identity becomes more difficult and strong religious identities have a new appeal. Post liberal theologians have endorsed the identity-forming power of the church. But Christian identity must still be worked out in relation to what lies beyond the borders of the church. Christians rediscover their own foundational story in the acts and deeds of others. Theological formation should involve not only an immersion in the Christian tradition but also the search for what recognisably shares in the same project that the gospel defines. The history of personalism suggests what this search might look like in practice.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The author 2008. Journal compilation © The Dominican Council/Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2008
References
1 Brown, P., Augustine of Hippo. (London, 1969) 313Google Scholar. I am grateful to Nicholas Lash for his comments on a draft of this article.
2 Brown, C., The Death of Christian Britain. Understanding Secularisation 1800–2000 (London, 2001)Google Scholar
3 Debray, R., Modeste contribution aux discourse et ceremonies officielles du dixieme anniversaire (Paris, 1978Google Scholar; abridged and translated in New Left Review 115, 1979) 12. He notes that a growing feminisation of the labour force contributed to the reconstruction of feminine identity.
4 Pellicani, L., The Genetics of Capitalism and the Origins of Modernity (New York, 1994), 163–180Google Scholar; J. Milbank, “Geopolitical Theology. Economy, Religion and Empire after 9/11”, http://wwwtheologyphilosophycentre.co.uk/Papers/Milbank_GeopliticalTheology.doc Milbank contests the notion that the United States is free from this secularisation. 72; Polanyi, K., The Great Transformation. (Boston, 2002) 35–44Google Scholar; McCarraher, E., “The Enchantments of Mammon: Notes Toward A Theological History of Capitalism”Modern Theology 21.3 (July 2005) 429–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar, argues with reference to commodity fetishism that far from being an unambiguous agent of disenchanted secularity, capitalism might be best understood as a perverse regime of the sacred, an order of things bearing unmistakeable traces of enchantment.
5 The Retort Collective, Afflicted Powers. Capital And Spectacle In A New Age Of War (London, 2005) 193Google Scholar.
6 Bell, D., Liberation Theology After The End Of History (London, 2001) 19Google Scholar.
7 Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-Identity (Stanford, 1991) 197Google Scholar.
8 Davie, G., Religion in Britain since 1945. Believing without Belonging (London, 1994)Google Scholar. Hervieu-Leger, D., Le Pelerin et le Converti (Paris, 1999)Google Scholar.
9 Appadurai, A., Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation (Minneapolis, 1996)Google Scholar chapter 1.
10 Sen, A., Identity and Violence (London, 2006)Google Scholar, reviewed by J. Gray in The Guardian August 5, 2006.
11 The Retort Collective, op. cit. n.5 supra 180.
12 Castells, M., The Information Age. Economy, Society, Culture. Volume II The Power of Identity (Oxford, 1997) 9Google Scholar; 65–67. See also Maghnagi, A., The Urban Village (London, 2005)Google Scholar on ‘the insurgent city’.
13 Turner, B., Religion and Social Theory (London, 1983) 197Google Scholar, cited in R. Williams On Christian Theology (Oxford, 2000) 34. Mary Midgley's account of the “biological Thatcherism” of scientists such as Richard Dawkins notes the way his work offers a powerful popular rhetoric which adds the apparent lustre of real science to the claim that there is no alternative to the domination of the capitalist market. The ideas of such scientists now legitimate the status quo. M. Midgely, Science and Poetry (London, 2001) 193–198; “Feast and Famine: a Conversation with Iain Boal on scarcity, catastrophe and enclosure”http://www.commoner.org.uk/feastandfamine.htm
14 A case study of such a resistance identity is offered by Toulis, N., Believing Identity: Pentecostalism and the Mediation of Jamaican Ethnicity and Gender in England (Oxford, 1997)Google Scholar. Cf. Herberg, W., Protestant, Catholic, Jew (New York, 1955)Google Scholar; Kelley, D., Why Conservative Churches are Growing (New York, 1972)Google Scholar; Barber, B., Jihad vs McWorld (New York, 1995)Google Scholar.
15 Lindbeck, G., “Ecumenism and the Future of Belief”, The Church in a Postliberal Age (London, 2002) 92–105Google Scholar.
16 Ratzinger, J., Salt of the Earth (San Francisco, 1997) 269Google Scholar.
17 J. Ratzinger cited in S. Ferrari, “Civil Religion or Intransigence: The Two Strategies”, http://www.chiesa May 30 2005, 6. For Ferrari, “These are words that give voice to the conviction of the communities and movements – from Communion and Liberation to Opus Dei – that exert themselves for a strong affirmation of Christian identity, and maintain that it is useless to embark upon a policy of enervating compromises with secular and liberal society, which is caught up in a crisis which they see as irreversible. According to them, it is better to engage in open and harsh conflict with other religious and non-religious identities in Europe, fortifying oneself with one's own intact doctrinal heritage, accentuating one's own distinctiveness, and counting on the possibility that a genuine Catholicism might be able to fulfil the need for security and identity felt throughout Europe”; Souletie, J.-L., La Crise: une chance pour la foi. (Paris, 2002)Google Scholar.
18 Lindbeck, G., The Nature of Doctrine. Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age (Philadelphia, 1984) 124–135Google Scholar.
19 Wells, S., Transforming Fate into Destiny (Carlisle, 1998) 11Google Scholar.
20 Hauerwas, S., Resident Aliens (Nashville, 1989) 12Google Scholar; Harvey, B., Another City. An Ecclesiological Primer for a Post-Christian World. (Harrisburg, 1999)Google Scholar.
21 D. Yaego, “Messiah's People: The Culture of the Church in the Midst of the Nations”Pro Ecclesia VI.1, 171.
22 Hauerwas, S., Performing the Faith (Grand Rapids, 2004) 34Google Scholar; M. Hollerich, “Retreiving a Neglected Critique of Church, Theology and Secularization in Weimar Germany”Pro Ecclesia II.3. The legal basis for the exclusive public legitimacy of the Protestant churches had vanished with the founding of the Weimar republic. With the legal and political expression of Offentlichkeit closed off, this left only a specifically ecclesiastical public identity.
23 R. Williams, “The Judgement of the World”, op. cit. n.13 supra 29–43.
24 Bonhoeffer's attempt to provide a christological interpretation of the secular is developed in Karl Barth's treatment of “secular parables” in Church Dogmatics IV/3.
25 Bonhoeffer, D., Letters and Papers from Prison (London, SCM) 300.Google Scholar
26 Taylor, C., A Catholic Modernity? (New York, 1999) 16Google Scholar “… in modern secularist culture there are mingled together both authentic developments of the gospel, of an incarnational mode of life, and also a closing off to God that negates the gospel. The notion is that modern culture, in breaking with the structures and beliefs of Christendom, also carried certain facets of Christian life further than they were ever taken or could be taken within Christendom.” Taylor, C., A Secular Age (London, 2007)Google Scholar.
27 Ernst, C., Multiple Echo (London, 1979) 85Google Scholar.
28 Ricoeur, P., Oneself as Another (Chicago, 1992)Google Scholar; R. Schenk, “Officium Signa Temporum Perscrutandi. New Encounters of Gospel and Culture in the Context of the New Evangelization”, a paper given at the conference The Call to Justice. The Legacy of Gaudium et Spes 40 Years Later http://www.stthomas.edu/cathstudies/cst/conferences/gaudium/
29 R. Williams, “Beyond Liberalism”Political Theology 3.1 2001, 68. In relation to the work of Hauerwas, Williams expresses concern that a too robustly and uncritically narrativist appeal to Christian identity is in danger of misrecognising identity and colluding with the Balkanized identity politics of liberal America by evading the issue of admitting the other into the self, which is the only way the self can be the self at all.
30 G. Lindbeck, op. cit. n. 15 supra, 17.
31 Brague, R., Eccentric Culture, (South Bend, 2002)Google Scholar, presents romanitas as the virtue of non self-alienating receptivity that informs the identity of Europeans.
32 In 2005, the centenary of the birth of Emmanuel Mounier, major conferences were organized, beyond the English speaking world, in Rome, Strasbourg, Paris, Lyon, Madrid and Rio. At the end of the conference in Rome the participants sent a petition to the pope requesting the introduction of the cause of his beatification. As a student Bonhoeffer was drawn to the personalism he encountered in the work of Berdaeyev and Dostoyoevsky. He succinctly defined it as a pan-humanism necessarily and emphatically linked to Christianity. Bethge, E., Dietrich Bonhoeffer (London, 1970) 47Google Scholar; J. de Gruchy, “Christian Humanism: Reclaiming a Tradition; Affirming an Identity” http://ctinquiry.org/publications/reflections_volume8/degruchy.htm
33 Bengtsson, J., “Critical Study: Personalism: A Living Philosophy?”Appraisal 5.1 (March, 2004) 39–48Google Scholar; The Worldview of Personalism (Oxford, 2006)Google Scholar. R. Reno rightly warns however of the danger of intellectual virtuosity eclipsing ecclesial obedience as the key to renewal; “The Radical Orthodoxy Project”First Things 100 (February 2000) 37–44.
34 The title of a work by V. Belohradsky cited in Havel, V., Disturbing the Peace (London, 1990) 165Google Scholar.
35 Mounier, E., Personalism (Notre Dame, 1952) xx–xxiiGoogle Scholar; Zizioulas, J., Being as Communion (New York, 1985)Google Scholar.
36 Coq, G., Emmanuel Mounier. Actes du Colloque tenu a l'UNESCO Tome 1 (Paris, 2003Google Scholar); Petit, J.-F., Penser avec Mounier (Lyon 2000)Google Scholar; Triest, V., Plus est en l'homme. Le personalisme vecu comme humanisme radical (Brussels, 2000)Google Scholar.
37 E. Mounier, op.cit. n. 35 supra xviii; 27.
38 Compare C. Ernst op. cit. n. 27 supra 169; On the darker side of this revolution see the contested accounts of Hellman, J., Emmanuel Mounier and the New Catholic Left 1930–1950 (Toronto, 1981)Google Scholar; Sterhell, Z., Neither Right Nor Left. Fascist Ideology in France (Princeton, 1995)Google Scholar.
39 Lowy, M. and Sayre, R., Romanticism Against the Tide of Modernity (London, 2001) 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar: On the importance of Mounier for Paolo Freire see Andreola, B., “Influence de la Pensee et du Temoignage de Mounier au Brazil”, Bulletin des Amis d' Emmanuel Mounier 73/74 (1990) 41–45Google Scholar.
40 P. Pombeni, “The ideology of Christian Democracy”Journal of Political Ideologies 5.3 (2000) 289–300. Pombeni describes how Christian democrats, originally inspired by personalism, were assimilated into the mainstream of European social democracy. By contrast, the insistence of the Archbishop of Paris on the Christian identity of the Institut Catholique recently issued in the resignation of its vice-chancellor Joseph Maila. Esprit 6 (2006) 91–110.
41 Mounier defines personalism in terms of “the human struggle to humanize humanity”; E. Mounier, op. cit. n.36 supra xix.
42 Ricoeur, P., “Emmanuel Mounier: A Personalist Philosopher”, History and Truth (Evanston, 1965) 133–161Google Scholar; 142–143.
43 Ricoeur, P., “Reflections on a new ethos for Europe”, The Hermeneutics of Action (London, 1996) 3–12Google Scholar; L. Roy describes Ernst's approach as akin to Ricoeur's; dialogic and acutely aware of the fact of difference. He takes up Ricoeur's search for “a meaning of meaning” including the meaning of what it is to be human. “Cornelius Ernst's Theological Seeds”New Blackfriars 85.998 (July 2004) 459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 Mounier speaks these words as a character in a magical realist novel by his Brazilian disciple Herbert de Souza (Betinho), A lista de Ailice (Sao Paulo, 1996)Google Scholar.