Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-30T15:13:11.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Politics of Gender: Limits and Possibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Georgina Waylen
Georgina Waylen
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield E-mail: g.waylen@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I explore some of the limits and possibilities for a comparative politics of gender (CPG). It argues that a CPG should analyze how major political processes and institutions are gendered thereby increasing our understanding of the major themes of comparative politics and enhancing the subfield. But a CPG should also go beyond this. It should be problem driven and should seek to answer some “big questions” that are important for any efforts to achieve gender equality such as how political change that lessens gender inequality occurs; and how positive gender outcomes come about in a range of contexts. A CPG therefore has an integral connection to a feminist project. I explore some of these themes using the recent literature on gender and transitions to democracy to answer the question under what circumstances can the gender outcomes of transitions be positive.

Type
Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 223 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertyn, Catherine. 1995. “Mainstreaming Gender' National Machinery for Women in South Africa: A Policy Outline.” Occasional Paper no. 24, Johannesburg: CALS.Google Scholar
Albertyn, Catherine, Goldblatt, Beth, Hassim, Shireen, Mbatha, Lisa, and Meintjes, Sheila, eds. 1999. Engendering the Political Agenda: A South African Case Study. Johannesburg: Centre for Applied Legal Studies.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia. 1999. Advocating Feminism: the Latin American Feminist NGO “Boom”. International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (2): 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2001. Coalition Politics and the Limits of State Feminism in Chile. Women and Politics 22 (4): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. Elected Bodies: the Adoption of Gender Quota Laws for Legislative Candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2010. The Gender Lacuna in Comparative Politics. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 1998. Women on the Defensive: Living Through Conservative Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike, and Haas, Liesl. 2005. Defining a Democracy: Reforming Laws on Women's Rights in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society 47 (3): 33–66.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Governance: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2003. State Feminism and Women's Movements: The Impact of SERNAM on Women's Activism. Latin American Research Review 38 (1): 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2005. Women and Politics in Chile. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth. 2000. Unfinished Transitions: Women and the Gendered Development of Democracy in Venezuela. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth. 2006. “Making Gender Rights Reality: National and Regional Mediation of International Human Rights Norms in Latin America.” Presented at the Latin American Studies Meeting, San Juan, Puerto Rico. March 16–18.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Kligman, Gail, eds. 2000. Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, Yvonne, and Sloat, Andrea. 2003. “Understanding Women's Political Engagement in the New Democracies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Presented at the European Consortium of Political Research Workshops, Edinburgh, March 15–18.Google Scholar
Geisler, Gisela. 2000. “Parliament Is Another Terrain of Struggle”: Women, Men and Politics in South Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies 38 (4): 616–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie, and Hassim, Shireen. 2002. In and Against the Party: Women's Representation and Constituency Building in Uganda and South Africa. In Gender, Justice, Development and Rights, ed. Molyneux, Maxine and Razavi, Shahra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Liesl. 2004. “Intergovernmental Relations and Feminist Policy Making: A Case Study of Domestic Violence in Chile.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 30-September 2.Google Scholar
Hassim, Shireen. 2003. The Gender Pact and Democratic Consolidation: Institutionalizing Gender Equality in the South African state. Feminist Studies 29 (3): 505–28.Google Scholar
Hassim, Shireen. 2006. Women's Organizations and Democracy in South Africa: Contesting Authority. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Hipsher, Patricia. 2001. Right and Left-wing Women in Post Revolutionary El Salvador: Feminist Autonomy and Cross Political Alliance Building for Gender Equality. In Radical Women of Latin America: Left and Right, ed. Gonzalez, Victoria and Kampwirth, Karen. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Weldon, S. Laurel. 2010. When Do Governments Promote Women's Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane, ed. 1994. The Women's Movement in Latin America: Feminism and the Transition to Democracy, London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane, and Wolchik, Sharon, eds. 1998. Women and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jezerska, Zelda. 2002. Gender Awareness and National Machineries in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. In Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State? ed. Rai, Shirin. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. Gendering Research in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 333–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, ed., with Sainsbury, Diane, Baudino, Claudie, Guadagnini, Marila, and Meier, Petra. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luciak, Ilja. 2001. After the Revolution: Gender and Democracy in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Guatemala. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Fiona. 2000. Tackling Violence against Women in Brazil: Converting International Principles into Effective Local Policy. In States of Conflict: Gender, Violence and Resistance, ed. Jacobs, Susie, Jacobson, Ruth, and Marchbank, Jennifer. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Fiona. 2003. “Sexual Politics, Party Politics: The PT Government's Policies on Gender Equity and Equality.” Centre for Brazilian Studies Working Paper 46, Oxford: St Antony's College.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Fiona. 2006. Gender Politics in Brazil and Chile: the Role of Parties in National and Local Policymaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave/St Antony's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard, and Montgomery, Kathleen, eds. 2003. Women's Access to Political Power in Post Communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meintjes, Sheila. 2003. The Politics of Engagement: Women Transforming the Policy Process—Domestic Violence Legislation. In No Short Cuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policymaking, ed. Goetz, Anne Marie and Hassim, Shireen. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce, ed. 2004. The Politics of Prostitution: Women's Movements, Democratic States, and the Globalization of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitanguy, Jacqueline. 2002. Bridging the Local and Global: Feminsim in Brazil and the International Human Rights Agenda. Social Research 69 (3): 805–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schild, Veronica. 1998. Market Citizenship and the New Democracies: The Ambiguous Legacies of Contemporary Chilean Women's Movements. Social Politics 5 (2): 232–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Comparison and Integration: A Path toward a Comparative Politics of Gender. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemienska, Renata. 1998. Consequences of Economic and Political Change for Women in Poland. In Women and Democracy, ed. Jaquette, Jane and Wolchik, Sharon. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride, ed. 2001. Abortion Politics, Women's Movements and the Democratic State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride, and Mazur, Amy, eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2010. Toward a Comparative Politics of Gender Research in which Women Matter. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 191–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2000. Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Argentina and Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies 32 (3): 765–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007a. Engendering Transitions: Women's Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007b. Women's Mobilization and Gender Outcomes in Transitions to Democracy: the South African Case. Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 521–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence against Women. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar