Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T17:30:25.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cultural Organization of Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Paul Meadows*
Affiliation:
Montana State University

Extract

Life, said William James, is a series of flights and perchings. Action is the process of life, and when its natural tempo or freedom is blocked or thwarted, the costs are those of life. Action is the goal-seeking behavior of the organism. All organisms have “goals”; without them they perish. Goals function as satisfiers of needs; without such satisfaction there is no life. Goal-directed action makes claims upon the organism's environments, and the levies are the stuff of life. Action is commerce with a milieu; “drives”—or any other motivational terms—only suggest the intensity and the form of that exchange; “death” is its cessation. The whole organism is involved, and the involvement is insistent, recurring, cyclical: it is the whole body which acts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 For a further elaboration of the act cycle see the present writer's “The Dialectic of the Situation, Some Notes on Situational Psychology,” Philisophy and Phenomenological Research, V (March, 1945), 354ff.

2 This is hardly a novel interpretation: see The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud (New York, 1938), Book I: “The Psychopathology of Everyday Life“; or K. Horney, The Neurotic Personality of Our Time (New York, 1937).

3 See Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (New York, 1937).

4 The sources of this interpretation are indicated in the present writer's studies of social movements: “Sequence in Revolution,” American Sociological Review, XXV (May–June, 1941); “The Situational Dialectic of Revolution,” Social Forces, XX (March, 1942); “Behavioral Bases of Social Movements,” Sociology and Social Research, XXVIII (November–December, 1943); “Movements of Social Withdrawal,” Sociology and Social Research, XXIX (September–October, 1944).

5 See H. S. Sullivan, “Psychiatric Aspects of Morale,” American Journal of Sociology, XLVII (November, 1941).

6 See T. D. Eliot, “The Possibilities of a Cultural Hygiene,” Psychiatry, VI (February, 1943).