Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T11:18:32.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

False Expectations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Abstract

Common probabilistic fallacies and putative paradoxes are surveyed, including those arising from distribution repartitioning, from the reordering of expectation series, and from misconceptions regarding expected and almost certain gains in games of chance. Conditions are given for such games to be well-posed. By way of example, Bernoulli's “Petersburg Paradox” and Hacking's “Strange Expectations” are discussed and the latter are resolved. Feller's generalized “fair price, in the classical sense” is critically reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eisen, M. (1969), Introduction to Mathematical Probability Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Enis, P. (1973), “On the Relation E(X) = E(E(X|Y))”, Biometrika 60: 432433.Google Scholar
Feller, W. (1945), “Note on the Law of Large Numbers and ‘Fair’ Games”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 16: 301304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1968), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1. New York & London: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1980), “Strange Expectations”, Philosophy of Science 47: 562567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, E. T. (1973), “The Well-Posed Problem”, Foundations of Physics 3: 477492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, A. (1983), “The Fallacy of Intrinsic Distributions”, submitted for publication.Google Scholar