Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T19:14:54.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrow Taxonomy and Wide Functionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Patricia Kitcher
Patricia Kitcher*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three recent, influential critiques (Stich 1978; Fodor 1981c; Block 1980) have argued that various tasks on the agenda for computational psychology put conflicting pressures on its theoretical constructs. Unless something is done, the inevitable result will be confusion or outright incoherence. Stich, Fodor, and Block present different versions of this worry and each proposes a different remedy. Stich wants the central notion of belief to be jettisoned if it cannot be shown to be sound. Fodor tries to reduce confusion in computational psychology by dismissing some putative tasks as impossible. Block argues that the widespread faith in functionalism is just not warranted. I argue that all these critiques are misguided because they depend on holding cognitive psychology to taxonomic standards that other sciences routinely rise above.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 78 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Ned Block, Philip Kitcher, Hilary Kornblith, and Joe Owens for helpful conversations, and to the M.I.T. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy for its hospitality during a valuable sabbatical visit. The helpful criticisms of two referees for Philosophy of Science enabled me to make a number of improvements in an earlier version.

References

Block, Ned (1980), “Troubles with Functionalism”, in Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Block, Ned (ed.). Vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (First published in Perception and Cognition: Issues in the Foundations of Psychology, C. Wade Savage [ed.] Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 9. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1978.)Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler (1979), “Individualism and the Mental”, in Studies in Epistemology, French, P., Uehling, T., and Wettstein, H. (eds.). Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 4. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, E. A. (1966), The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1980), Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth (1973), “The Causal Theory of Names”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s., supp. vol. 47, pp. 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Hartry (1977), “Logic, Meaning and Conceptual Role”, Journal of Philosophy 74: 370–409.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry (1978), “Mental Representations”, Erkenntnis 13: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1981a), Representations. Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1981b), “Tom Swift and his Procedural Grandmother”, in Representations. (First published in Cognition 6, 1978.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1981c), “Methodological Solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology”, in Representations. (First published in The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 1980.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (1970), “Language and Learning”, Noûs 4: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip (1977), “Procedural Semantics”, Cognition 5: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon (1978), “Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables”, American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 149–56.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1981), “Explanatory Unification”, Philosophy of Science 48: 507–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1982), Abusing Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lettvin, J.; Maturana, R. R.; McCulloch, W. S.; and Pitts, W. H. (1959), “What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain”, Proceedings of the Institute for Radio Engineers 47: 1940–51.Google Scholar
Lycan, William (1979), “A New Lilliputian Argument against Machine Functionalism”, Philosophical Studies 35: 379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, William (1981), “Form, Function, and Feel”, The Journal of Philosophy 77: 24–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, David (1976), “Early Processing of Visual Information”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Vol. 275, 942, pp. 483–534.Google Scholar
Marr, David, and Poggio, Tomasso (1976), “Cooperative Computation of Stereo Disparity”, Science 194: 283–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, Ernst (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (n.d.), “Computational Psychology and Interpretation Theory”. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (n.d.), (1975), “The meaning of ‘meaning‘”, in Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Gunderson, K. (ed.). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid (1963), Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Springer, Sally P., and Deutsch, Georg (1981), Left Brain, Right Brain. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen (1978), “Autonomous Psychology and the Belief-Desire Thesis”, The Monist 61: 573–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, Stephen (1982), “On the Ascription of Content”, in Thought and Object, Woodfield, A. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen (1983), From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winograd, Terry (1971), Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language. Cambridge: MIT Project MAC.Google Scholar