Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T11:13:57.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Consciousness?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Norton Nelkin
Norton Nelkin*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of New Orleans
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Philosophy, University of New Orleans, Lakefront, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When philosophers and psychologists think about consciousness, they generally focus on one or more of three features: phenomenality (how experiences feel), intentionality (that experiences are “of” something, that experiences mean something), and introspectibility (our awareness of the phenomenality and intentionality of experience). Using examples from empirical psychology and neuroscience, I argue that consciousness is not a unitary state, that, instead, these three features characterize different and dissociable states, which often happen to occur together. Understanding these three features as dissociable from each other will resolve philosophical disputes and facilitate scientific investigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 419 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Carolyn Morillo, Alan Soble, Jim Stone, Edward Johnson, Richard Hall, Martin Davies, and A. J. Marcel for commenting on an earlier version of this paper and for providing useful suggestions for its improvement. Kent Bach provided helpful comments when a version of this paper was presented at the meetings of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology (10 June 1990). Audience comments there, at the Tulane Seminar for Current Research, and at the Louisiana State Philosophy Convention were also helpful. I would especially like to thank an anonymous reader for this journal who asked many thought-provoking questions concerning an earlier draft, resulting in an improved presentation of the ideas.

References

Boghossian, P. A. and Velleman, J. D. (1991), “Physicalist Theories of Color”, Philosophical Review 100: 67–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, J.; Latto, R.; and Smith, Y. M. (1983), “Is Blindsight an Effect of Scattered Light, Spared Cortex, and Near Threshold Vision?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6: 423–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, M, (1988), “Doubt and Developing Theories of Mind”, in Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L., and Olson, D. R. (eds.), Developing Theories of Mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 387–413.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. A. and Shepard, R. N. (1984), “Turning Something Over in the Mind”, Scientific American 251: 106–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. (1991), Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. ([1642] 1986), Meditations on First Philosophy, in J. Cottingham (trans. and ed.), René Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy, With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, N. F. (1984), “Subliminal Perception”, in Gregory, R. L. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 752–755.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. and LeDoux, J. E. (1978), The Integrated Mind. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C. L. (1988), Color for Philosophers: Unweaving the Rainbow. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Keating, E. G. (1979), “Rudimentary Color Vision in the Monkey after Removal of Striate and Preoccipital Cortex”, Brain Research 179: 379–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980), Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. (1987), “Seeing and Imaging in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach”, Psychological Review 94: 148–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, M. (1988), “Characterising the Senses”, Mind & Language 3: 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C. (1988), “Consciousness and Content”, Proceedings of the British Academy 74: 219–239.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. (1989), “Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?” Mind 98: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1942), Unconsciousness. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1974), “What is it Like to be a Bat?” Philosophical Review 83: 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1986), The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. (1983), “Concepts of Consciousness”, Journal of Mind and Behavior 4: 13–59.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. (1989), “An Examination of Four Objections to Self-Intimating States of Consciousness”, Journal of Mind and Behavior 10: 63–116.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. (1990), “Reflective Seeing: An Exploration in the Company of Edmund Husserl and James J. Gibson”, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 21: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1986), “Pains and Pain Sensations”, Journal of Philosophy 83: 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1987a), “How Sensations Get Their Names”, Philosophical Studies 51: 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1987b), “What is it Like to be a Person?” Mind & Language 2: 220–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1989a), “Prepositional Attitudes and Consciousness”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1989b), “Unconscious Sensations”, Philosophical Psychology 2: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1990), “Categorising the Senses”, Mind & Language 5: 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1993a), “The Connection Between Intentionality and Consciousness”, in Davies, M. and Humphreys, G. (eds.), Consciousness: Psychological and Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 224–239.Google Scholar
Nelkin, N. (1993b), “Patterns”. In preparation.Google Scholar
Nelkin, N. (forthcoming-a), “The Belief in Other Minds”, in D. F. Gottlieb and S. J. Odell (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar
Nelkin, N. (forthcoming-b), “Phenomena and Representation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Reingold, E. M. and Merikle, P. M. (1990), “On the Inter-Relatedness of Theory and Measurement in the Study of Unconscious Processes”, Mind & Language 5: 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, D. M. (1986), “Two Concepts of Consciousness”, Philosophical Studies 49: 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1980), “Minds, Brains, and Programs”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983), Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1989), “Consciousness, Unconsciousness, and Intentionality”, Philosophical Topics 17: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1990), “Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion, and Cognitive Science”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 585–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoerig, P. and Cowey, A. (1989), “Wavelength Sensitivity in Blindsight”, Nature 342: 916–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volpe, B. T.; LeDoux, J. E.; and Gazzaniga, M. S. (1979), “Information Processing of Visual Stimuli in an ‘Extinguished’ Field”, Nature 282: 722–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. (1977), “Trying to Bridge some Neuropsychological Gaps Between Monkey and Man”, British Journal of Psychology 68: 433–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiskrantz, L. (1986), Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Philosophical Investigations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Young, A. W. and de Haan, E. H. F. (1990), “Impairments of Visual Awareness”, Mind & Language 5: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar