No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Identifying phosphorus use efficient genotypes by evaluating a chickpea reference set across different phosphorus regimes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2024
Abstract
Low phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) is one of the abiotic factors that hamper yield and production potential in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Higher yield coupled with improved PUE can make this crop more adaptive and competitive to wide cropland area, especially on marginal soils having low-level phosphorus (P). To identify chickpea germplasm lines that assimilate phosphorus more efficiently under P-deficient soils, 288 diverse genotypes of chickpea belonging to reference set were evaluated for yield component traits and PUE under field conditions for two consecutive years at two phosphorus levels (low P – no phosphorus application and high P – phosphorus application at 40 kg/ha). Based on 2-year evaluation of data under high and low P soil conditions, we identified strong correlations for traits like number of primary and secondary branches, number of pods, biological yield and seed yield indicating that these traits can be used as proxy traits for PUE. ICC 6571 was the best performing genotype under low P conditions while ICC 6579 yielded maximum under high P regime. We report 16 genotypes namely ICC 1052, ICC 1083, ICC 1098, ICC 1161, ICC 2072, ICC 4418, ICC 4567, ICC 4991, ICC 5504, ICC 5639, ICC 7413, ICC 8350, ICC 9590, ICC 9702, ICC 11584 and ICC 13357 as phosphorus use efficient genotypes based on their better performance for yield and yield-contributing traits under low P compared to high P conditions. These genotypes can be exploited in future as potential donors for development of phosphorus use efficient chickpea cultivars.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany
References
Ahmad, Z, Gill, MA and Qureshi, RH (2001) Genotypic variations of phosphorus utilization efficiency of crops. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24, 1149–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, Q, Tahir, MHN, Sadaqat, HA, Arshad, S, Farooq, J, Ahsan, M, Waseem, M and Iqbal, A (2011) Genetic variability and correlation analysis for quantitative traits in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Bacteriology Research 3, 6–9.Google Scholar
Bahl, PN and Jain, HK (1977) Association among agronomic characters and plant ideotype in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung 79, 154–159.Google Scholar
Bovill, WD, Huang, CY and McDonald, GK (2013) Genetic approaches to enhancing phosphorus-use efficiency (PUE) in crops: challenges and directions. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, A, Herdean, A, Schmidt, SB, Sharma, A, Spetea, C, Pribil, M and Husted, S (2018) The impacts of phosphorus deficiency on the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Plant Physiology 177, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaturvedi, SK, Mishra, DK and Kumar, H (2009) Evaluation of donors for various qualitative and yield traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Trends in Biosciences 2, 53–55.Google Scholar
Chopdar, DK, Bharti, B, Sharma, PP, Dubey, RB and Meena, BL (2017) Studies on genetic variability, character association and path analysis for yield and its contributing traits in chickpea [Cicer arietinum (L.)]. Legume Research 40, 824–829.Google Scholar
Chrigui, N, Sari, D, Sari, H, Eker, T, Cengiz, MF, Ikten, C and Toker, C (2021) Introgression of resistance to leafminer (Liriomyza cicerina Rondani) from Cicer reticulatum Ladiz. to C. arietinum L. and relationships between potential biochemical selection criteria. Agronomy 11, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conijn, JG, Bindraban, PS, Schroder, JJ and Jongschaap, R (2018) Can our food system meet food demand within planetary boundaries? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 251, 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordell, D, Drangert, J and White, S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environment Change 19, 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, GP, Srivastava, AK and Singh, NP (2019) Marching towards self-sufficiency in chickpea. Current Science 116, 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eker, T, Sari, D, Sari, H, Tosun, HS and Toker, C (2022) A kabuli chickpea ideotype. Scientific Reports 12, 1611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fageria, NK (2007) Yield physiology of rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30, 843–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fageria, NK and Santos, AD (2008) Yield physiology of dry bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31, 983–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ficiciyan, A, Loos, J, Sievers-Glotzbach, S and Tscharntke, T (2018) More than yield: ecosystem services of traditional versus modern crop varieties revisited. Sustainability 10, 2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, R, Bhattacharjee, A and Jain, M (2015) Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into molecular aspects of abiotic stress responses in chickpea. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 33, 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaur, PM, Samineni, S, Thudi, M, Tripathi, S, Sajja, SB, Jayalakshmi, V, Jayalakshmi, V, Mannur, DM, Vijayakumar, AG, Rao, NVPRG, Ojiewo, C, Fikre, A, Kimurto, P, Kileo, RO, Girma, N, Chaturvedi, SK, Varshney, RK and Dixit, GP (2019) Integrated breeding approaches for improving drought and heat adaptation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Breeding 138, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowda, CLL, Upadhyaya, HD, Dronavalli, N and Singh, S (2011) Identification of large-seeded high-yielding stable kabuli chickpea germplasm lines for use in crop improvement. Crop Science 51, 198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumber, RK, Singh, S, Rathore, P and Singh, K (2000) Selection indices and character association in chickpea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 13, 56–58.Google Scholar
Hagos, AA, Desalegn, T and Belay, T (2018) Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for quantitative traits of seed yield, and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at Maichew, Northern Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science 12, 58–64.Google Scholar
Jain, SK, Wettberg, EJV, Punia, SS, Parihar, AK, Lamichaney, A, Kumar, J, Gupta, DS, Ahmad, S, Pant, NC, Dixit, GP, Sari, H, Sari, D, Maruf, A, Toker, P and Toker, C (2023) Genomic-mediated breeding strategies for global warming in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Agriculture 13, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashiani, P and Saleh, G (2010) Estimation of genetic correlations on sweet corn inbred lines using SAS mixed model. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keneni, G, Bekele, E, Assefa, F, Imtiaz, M, Debele, T, Dagne, K and Getu, E (2015) Characterization of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm accessions for phosphorus uptake and use efficiency II. Interrelationships of characters and gains from selection. Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology 6, 77–96.Google Scholar
Krishnappa, R, Umesh, HR and Hussain, ISA (2011) Variations in phosphorus uptake and its utilization in pigeonpea genotypes grown under phosphorus deficiency. Journal of Food Legumes 24, 96–100.Google Scholar
Lambers, H, Martinoia, E and Renton, M (2015) Plant adaptations to severely phosphorus-impoverished soils. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 25, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Villalba, G, Ayres, RU and Schroder, H (2008) Global phosphorus flows and environmental impacts from a consumption perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyu, Y, Tang, H, Li, H, Zhang, F, Rengel, Z, Whalley, WR and Shen, J (2016) Major crop species show differential balance between root morphological and physiological responses to variable phosphorus supply. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madzivhandila, T, Ogola, JBO and Odhiambo, JJO (2012) Growth and yield response of four chickpea cultivars to phosphorus fertilizer rates. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 10, 451–455.Google Scholar
Malik, SR, Bakhsh, A, Asif, MA, Iqbal, U and Iqbal, SM (2010) Assessment of genetic variability and interrelationship among some agronomic traits in chickpea. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12, 81–85.Google Scholar
Meng, X, Chen, WW, Wang, YY, Huang, ZR, Ye, X, Chen, LS and Yang, LT (2021) Effects of phosphorus deficiency on the absorption of mineral nutrients, photosynthetic system performance and antioxidant metabolism in Citrus grandis. PLoS ONE 16, e0246944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, PA, Williams, JC Jr, Robinson, HF and Comstock, RE (1958) Estimates of genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in upland cotton and their implications in selection. Agronomy Journal 50, 126–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, RH, Kamprath, EJ and Jackson, WA (1982) Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal 74, 562–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, J, Zhao, H, Bansal, R, Bohuon, E, Lambers, H, Ryan, MH and Siddique, KHM (2018) Leaf transpiration plays a role in phosphorus acquisition among a large set of chickpea genotypes. Plant Cell and Environment 41, 2069–2079.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Reijnders, L (2014) Phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 93, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salgotra, SK (2016) Association studies for seed yield and its attributing traits in desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. Legume Genomics and Genetics 7, 1–6.Google Scholar
SAS (2013) SAS Institute, The SAS System for Windows Release. Version 9.3. Available at https://www.sas.com/en_in/software/stat.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sharma, SK and Sharma, TR (2015) Re-orienting crop improvement program in the changing climate. In Dixit, GP, Singh, J and Singh, NP (eds), Pulses: Challenges and Opportunities Under Changing Climatic Scenario, Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development. Kanpur, India: ICAR – Indian Institute of Pulses Research, pp. 30–39.Google Scholar
Sharma, BD, Sood, BC and Malhotra, VV (1989) Association studies in chickpea. Crop Improvement 16, 190–192.Google Scholar
Sprent, JI (1999) Nitrogen fixation and growth of non-crop legume species in diverse environments prospect. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasarao, C, Ganeshamurthy, AN, Ali, M and Venkateswarlu, B (2006) Phosphorus and micronutrient nutrition of chickpea genotypes in a multi-nutrient-deficient typic Ustochrept. Journal of Plant Nutrition 29, 747–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, I (1998) Phosphorus availability in the 21st century: management of a non-renewable resource. Phosphorus and Potassium 217, 25–31.Google Scholar
Syers, JK, Johnston, AA and Curtin, D (2008) Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use. Reconciling changing concepts of soil phosphorus behaviour with agronomic information. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin 18(108); Rome.Google Scholar
Thakur, SK and Sirohi, A (2009) Correlation and path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under different seasons. Legume Research 32, 1–6.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD and Oritz, R (2001) A mini core subset for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement. Theoretical Applied Genetics 102, 1292–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Bramel, PJ and Singh, S (2001) Development of a chickpea core subset using geographic distribution and quantitative traits. Crop Science 41, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Ortiz, R, Bramel, PJ and Singh, S (2002) Phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic characteristics in chickpea core collection. Euphytica 123, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Furman, BJ, Dwivedi, SL, Udupa, SM, Gowda, CLL, Baum, M, Crouch J, H, Buhariwalla, HK and Singh, S (2006) Development of a composite collection for mining germplasm possessing allelic variation for beneficial traits in chickpea. Plant Genetic Resources 4, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Dwivedi, SL, Baum, M, Varshney, RK, Udupa, SM, Gowda, CLL, Hoisington, DA and Singh, S (2008) Genetic structure, diversity and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Plant Biology 8, 106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaghela, MD, Poshiya, VK, Savaliya, JJ, Davada, BK and Mungra, KD (2009) Studies on character association and path analysis for seed yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Legume Research 32, 245–249.Google Scholar
van de Wiel, CCM, van der Linden, CG and Scholten, OE (2016) Improving phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture: opportunities for breeding. Euphytica 207, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, RK, Thudi, M, May, GD and Jackson, SA (2010) Legume genomics and breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 33, 257–304.Google Scholar
Wen, G, Chen, C, Neill, K, Wichman, D and Jackson, G (2008) Yield response of pea, lentil and chickpea to phosphorus addition in a clay loam soil of central Montana. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 54, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zribi, OT, Hessini, K, Trabelsi, N, Zribi, F, Hamdi, A, Ksouri, R and Abdelly, C (2017) Aeluropus littoralis maintains adequate gas exchange, pigment composition and phenolic contents under combined effects of salinity and phosphorus deficiency. Australian Journal of Botany 65, 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar et al. supplementary material
Kumar et al. supplementary material
File
349.2 KB