Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T13:54:54.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Opposition Advantage: Islamist Opposition Parties and Security Cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2020

Syed Rashid Munir*
Affiliation:
Forman Christian College University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Syed Rashid Munir, Department of Political Science, Forman Christian College University, Canal Road, Lahore, Pakistan. E-mail: srmunir@gmail.com

Abstract

This paper highlights the impact of religious oppositions in Muslim-majority states towards security cooperation with the U.S. Such cooperation provides security but is risky as the U.S. can coerce its weaker allies and push for regime change. To protect against this possibility, this paper suggests that incumbents in recipient states strategically extend or limit cooperation based on the strength of Islamist opposition parties. Weaker Islamist oppositions pose a threat to incumbents in recipient states as the U.S. can coerce and replace them without fear of bringing anti-U.S. elements to power, which results in lower cooperation. In case of a stronger Islamist opposition, the regime's replacement cannot offer better policy concessions to the U.S.; hence, a strong Islamist opposition leads to more extensive cooperation. This mechanism is demonstrated through U.S. military aid acceptance in 40 Muslim-majority states during 2002–2015, and a comparison of U.S. security relations with Algeria and Tunisia.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arieff, Alexis. 2018. “Tunisia: In Brief.” Current Politics and Economics of Africa 11 (4): 287303. http://proxy.binghamton.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.binghamton.edu/docview/2273145947?accountid=14168.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael A., Strezhnev, Anton, and Voeten, Erik. 2015. “Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (2): 430456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglaiser, Glen, and DeRouen, Karl Jr. 2009. “The Interdependence of U.S. Troop Deployments and Trade in the Developing World.” Foreign Policy Analysis 5: 247263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa, and Linzer, Drew A.. 2012. “Elite Competition, Religiosity, and Anti-Americanism in the Islamic World.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 225243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Ahsan I. 2013. “Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America's War-Prone Decade, 1932–41.” International Organization 67: 575607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, David, and Regan, Patrick. 2016. “Mass Mobilization Protest Data.” Harvard Dataverse. http://www.10.7910/DVN/HTTWYL (Accessed March 1, 2020).Google Scholar
ElDin, Dina Salah. 2014. Tunisia's President Asks for Increased Economic and Security Assistance. Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A384779287/AONE?u=bingul&sid=AONE&xid=4c5acfe1.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Inklaar, Robert, and Timmer, Marcel P.. 2015. “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table.” American Economic Review 105 (10): 31503182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghanem, Dalia. 2019. “The Shifting Foundations of Political Islam in Algeria.” https://carnegie-mec.org/2019/05/03/shifting-foundations-of-political-islam-in-algeria-pub-79047 (Accessed August 28, 2019).Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Havard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 1993. “Power Politics and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 408420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegre, Håvard, Ellingsen, Tanja, Gates, Scott, and Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 2001. “Toward a Democratic Civilpeace? Democracy, Political change, and Civil War, 1816–1992.” American Political Science Review 95 (1): 3348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Kupchan, Charles A.. 1990. “Socialization and Hegemonic Power.” International Organization 44 (3): 283315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamal, Amaney A. 2012. Of Empires and Citizens: Pro-American Democracy or No Democracy at All? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kepel, Gilles. 2002. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Woosang. 1989. “Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816–1975.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 33 (2): 255273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzman, Charles, and Türkoğlu, Didem. 2015. “After the Arab Spring: Do Muslims Vote Islamic Now?Journal of Democracy 26 (4):100109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations.” International Organization 50 (1): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2013. “Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of U.S. International Hierarchy.” International Security 38 (2): 74111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen, and Jamal, Amaney A.. 2002. “Rulers and Rules: Reassessing the Influence of Regime Type on Electoral Law Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (3): 337366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, and Jaggers, Keith. 2016. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transition, 18002015. College Park: Center for Systemic Peace. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html (Accessed November 16, 2018).Google Scholar
McDonald, Patrick J. 2015. “Great Powers, Hierarchy, and Endogenous Regimes: Rethinking the Domestic Causes of Peace.” International Organization 69 (2): 557588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (4): 513553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Palmer, Glenn. 2003. “To Protect and to Serve: Alliances and Foreign Policy Portfolios.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (2): 180203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1973. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Peace and Power. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1991. “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances.” American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 904933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousseau, Michael. 1997. “Democracy and Militarized Interstate Collaboration.” Journal of Peace Research 34 (1): 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Reponses to Terrorism (START). 2016. “Global Terrorism Database.” https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd (Accessed 2016).Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Lindsey. 2013. “Secrecy and Security: U.S.-Orchestrated Regime Change During the Cold War.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42:427460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakthivel, Vish. 2017. “Political Islam in Post-Conflict Algeria.” Current Trends in Islamist Ideology 22:116142.Google Scholar
Savun, Burcu, and Tirone, Daniel C.. 2018. “Foreign Aid as a Counterterrorism Tool: More Liberty, Less Terror?Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (8): 16071635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M., and Starrr, Harvey. 1994. “Regime Change and the Restructuring of Alliances.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 145161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, and Linz, Juan. 2013. “Democratization Theory and the “Arab Spring”.” Journal of Democracy 24 (2):1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Agency for International Development. 2017. U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants. Washington, DC: USAID. http://gbk.eads.usaidallnet.gov/.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2017. “FY 2017 Congressional Budget Justification—Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs.” https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/d/rm/rls/ebs/2017/pdf/index.htm (Accessed April 22, 2019).Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2019. “International Energy Statistics.” https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/data (Accessed August 28, 2019).Google Scholar
Wolf, Anne. 2017. Political Islam in Tunisia: The History of Ennahda. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The World Factbook. 2019. “The World Factbook.” https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/one_page_summaries.html (Accessed August 28, 2019).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Munir Supplementary Materials

Munir Supplementary Materials

Download Munir Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 154.3 KB