Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T05:50:28.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Overlooked Ethics of the Human Genome Diversity Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Henry T. Greely*
Affiliation:
Stanford University, USA
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Human Genome Diversity Project
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greely, H.T. (1993). “Human Genome Diversity Project, Summary of Planning Workshop 3(B): Ethical and Human Rights Implications.Available from author.Google Scholar
Greely, H.T. (1997a). “The Control of Genetic Research: Involving the Groups Between.” Houston Law Review 33: 13971430.Google Scholar
Greely, H.T. (1997b). “The Ethics of the Human Genome Diversity Project: The North American Regional Committee's Proposal Model Ethical Protocol.” In Knoppers, B. M. (ed.), Human DNA Sampling: Law and Policy: International and Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Human Genome Diversity Project, Summary Document (The Alghero Report) (1994). Available athttp://www.stanford.edu/group/morrinst/hgdp.htmlGoogle Scholar
Moore v. Regents of the University of California (1990). 51 Cal.3d 120, 793 P.2d 479, 271 Cal. Rptr. 146.Google Scholar
North American Regional Committee (NAmC) (1997). Human Genome Diversity Project, Proposed Model Ethical Protocol for Collecting DNA Samples. Houston Law Review 33: 14311473. Also available athttp://www.stanford.edu/group/morrinst/hgdp.html.Google Scholar
Resnik, D.B. (1999). “The Human Genome Diversity Project: Ethical Problems and Solutions.” Politics and the Life Sciences 18: 1523.Google Scholar