Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T10:54:10.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing Prepositioned Burn Care-Specific Disaster Resources for a BMCI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Randy Kearns
Affiliation:
University of New Orleans, New Orleans, USA
Carl Flores
Affiliation:
University Medical Center, New Orleans, USA
Paige Hargrove
Affiliation:
Louisiana Emergency Response Network, Baton Rouge, USA
Frances Arledge
Affiliation:
Louisiana Hospital Association Research & Education Foundation, Baton Rouge, USA
Rosanne Prats
Affiliation:
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Baton Rouge, USA
Joseph Kanter
Affiliation:
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Baton Rouge, USA
Chris Hector
Affiliation:
Louisiana Emergency Response Network, Baton Rouge, USA
Jason Woods
Affiliation:
DC Firefighters Burn Foundation, Wasington, USA
Kevin Sittig
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, Shreveport, USA
Jeffrey Carter
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, New Orleans, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Disaster planning and preparedness for a burn mass casualty incident (BMCI) must consider the needs of those who will be directly involved and support the response to such an event. An aspect of developing a more comprehensive statewide burn disaster program included meeting (regionally) with healthcare coalitions (HCC) to identify gaps in care and deficiencies.

Method:

Regularly scheduled (quarterly) HCC meetings are held around the state linking stakeholders representing local hospitals, health departments, emergency medical services (EMS) agencies, and other interested parties. We were able to use the HCCs regional meetings to serve as a platform for conducting focus group research to identify gaps specific to a BMCI and to inform strategy development for a statewide approach. Additionally, we held engagement meetings with state emergency response network (a state agency that coordinates the movement of ambulances to appropriate destinations) and the Burn Medical Directors findings were vetted from the focus groups.

Results:

One of the deficiencies identified, included a lack of burn-specific wound care dressings that could support the initial response. Relying on this same process, a consensus was attained for equipment types and quantities, including a kit for storage. Furthermore, a maintenance, supply replacement, and delivery to the scene processes were developed for these kits of supplies that could augment a BMCI response.

Conclusion:

Focus group feedback reminded us that outside of the world of burn care, many report an infrequent opportunity to provide care for patients with burn injuries. Several types of burn-specific dressings can be expensive, and with the occurrence being infrequent. EMS agencies and rural hospitals alike reported that it was unlikely their agency/hospital would have more than a minimal stock of burn injury supplies. Developing supply caches that can be quickly mobilized and deployed to the impacted area was one of the deficiencies we addressed.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine