Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T02:55:01.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship between digestibility, methane energy loss and metabolisable energy of whole crop wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

A T Adesogan
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading, Berks RG6 2AT Feed Evaluation Unit, ADAS Dairy Research Centre, Drayton, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwicks CV37 9RQ
D I Givens
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation Unit, ADAS Dairy Research Centre, Drayton, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwicks CV37 9RQ
E Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading, Berks RG6 2AT
Get access

Extract

Recognition of the potential of whole crop wheat (WCW) as an ‘environmentally friendly’ complement to grass silage has led to several studies on its nutritive value. Most of these quantified nutritive value using the in vivo digestibility technique. In spite of the number of studies on the subject, there is little information available on the relationship between the digestibility and metabolisable energy (ME) content of WCW. The complications of measuring methane production have also meant that where reported, ME values for WCW have been estimated rather than measured. Accurate ME measurements are integral for the inclusion of WCW when formulating livestock diets. This study examined the relationship between digestibility in vivo and ME content derived using measured methane contents of WCW harvested at different stages of maturity and conserved using contrasting methods. The study forms part of an on-going MAFF LINK project that aims to develop equations for the laboratory-based prediction of the nutritive value of WCW.

Type
Cattle Nutrition & Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaxter, K.L. and Clapperton, J.L. 1965 Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition, 19, 511522.10.1079/BJN19650046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, R.A. 1986 The energy value of grass silage. In: Ruminant Feed Evaluation (eds. Stark, B.A., Givens, D.I. and Wilkinson, J.M.), pp 3538 Marlow, Chalcombe.Google Scholar
Porter, M.G., Patterson, D.G., Steen, R.W.J. and Gordon, F.J. 1984. Determination of dry matter and gross energy of grass silage. Proceedings of The Seventh Silage Conference, Queens University, Belfast, pp 8990.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J.C., Cheng, T.T. and Konzak, C.F. 1974 A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14: 415421.10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar