No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A METHODICAL APPROACH TO INTEGRATED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
Part of:
Socio-technical Issues in Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2020
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Hip joint arthroplasty is considered to be a safe, successful and cost-effective procedure to restore hip joint functionality. However, a successful hip joint arthroplasty affects different stakeholders e.g. patient and surgeon and depends on various influencing factors within the product life cycle as well as the applied technological opportunities. Due to the complex dependencies between influencing factors, technological opportunities and stakeholders, this contribution introduces an IPD-based approach to improve the quality of total hip arthroplasties.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bezuidenhout, M.B. et al. (2015), “Titanium-Based Hip Stems with Drug Delivery Functionality through Additive Manufacturing”, BioMed research international, Vol. 2015. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/134093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, L.-K. and Wu, M.-L. (2002), “Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 143 No. 3, pp. 463–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damm, P., Bender, A. and Bergmann, G. (2015), “Postoperative Changes in In Vivo Measured Friction in Total Hip Joint Prosthesis during Walking”, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragomir-Daescu, D. et al. (2011), “Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip”, Annals of biomedical engineering, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 742–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0196-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudda, M. et al. (2010), “Risk Factors for Early Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study”, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, pp. 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901001800209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017), Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446449084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, L.V. et al. (2018), Long-term results of an anatomically implanted hip arthroplasty with a short stem prosthesis (MiniHip), Vol. 9 No. 10, pp. 210–219. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i10.210Google Scholar
Grosso, P., Snider, M. and Muir, J.M. (2016), “A Smart Tool for Intraoperative Leg Length Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study”, The open orthopaedics journal, Vol. 10, pp. 490–499. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001610010490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, S.A. et al. (2015), Metal-on-polyethylene versus metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty ION LEVELS AND CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS IN PERIPHERAL, Vol. 97 No. 9, pp. 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.34824Google Scholar
Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D. (1988), “The House of Qualit”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
Kärrholm, J. et al. (2018), Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2017. https://doi.org/10.18158/BkOffx7U4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, V.M. and Post, Z.D. (2017), “Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty”, Indian journal of orthopaedics, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 368–376. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fortho.IJOrtho_317_16Google ScholarPubMed
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00977_2.xGoogle Scholar
Rahmati, S., Abbaszadeh, F. and Farahmand, F. (2012), “An improved methodology for design of custom-made hip prostheses to be fabricated using additive manufacturing technologies”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211250382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaswamy, R. and Ulrich, K. (1993), “Augmenting the House of Quality with Engineering Models”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St-Pierre, J.-P. et al. “Three-dimensional growth of differentiating MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts on porous titanium scaffolds”, Biomaterials, Vol. 26, pp. 7319–7328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, S. et al. (2016), One-stage or two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection – the INFORM trial : a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1213-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vajna, S. (ed.). (2014), Integrated Design Engineering: ein interdisziplinäres Modell für die ganzheitliche Produktentwicklung, Springer Vieweg, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41104-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, D.D. et al. (2015), Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.19981220Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access