No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Approaches to reducing gear mass and their effects on gearing stresses and deformations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This study compares empirical and topology optimization methods for reducing gear body mass. Specimens produced via empirical guidelines and topology optimization were compared to referent full-disc gear, focusing on stresses and deformations. Values were determined numerically (Ansys was used) and the calculation method was verified using ISO 6336. The empirical approach exhibited substantial increases in stress and deformation while topology optimization method had promising outcomes. While decreasing mass, it also diminished tooth root stress on the tensile side by 17.1%.
- Type
- Engineering Design Practice
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
AGNA (2001), AGMA 2001--D04: Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur and Helical Gear Teeth. Alexandria, American Gear Manufacturers Association, Alexandria.žGoogle Scholar
Bozca, M. and Fietkau, P. (2010), “Empirical model based optimization of gearbox geometric design parameters to reduce rattle noise in an automotive transmission”, Mechanism and machine theory, Vol. 45, pp. 1599–1612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čular, I., Vučković, K., Mašović, R., Žeželj, D. and Galić, I. (2023), “The effect of the adjacent tooth and rim elasticity on fatigue behavior in thin-rimmed spur gears”. Proceedings to the 1516th International Conference on Recent Innovations in Engineering and Technology, Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Diez-Ibarbia, A., del Rincon, Fernandez, Iglesias, A., de-Juan, M., Garcia, A., and Viadero, P., F. (2016), “Efficiency analysis of spur gears with a shifting profile”, Meccanica, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0209-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregov, G., Marunić, G. and Glažar, V. (2010), “Naprezanja u korijenu zuba zupčanika s ravnim zubima određena različitim metodama proračuna”, Engineering Review, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 49–61.Google Scholar
Hohn, B. (2010), “Improvements on noise reduction and efficiency of gears”, Meccanica, Vol. 45, pp. 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-009-9251-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, L., Lei, Y., Fu, Y. and Hu, J. (2020), “Effects of lightweight gear blank on noise, vibration and harshness for electric drive system in electric vehicles”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, Vol. 234 No. 3, pp. 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419320915006Google Scholar
ISO (2019), ISO 6336:2019: Calculation of load capacity of spur and helical gears, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Miler, D. and Hoić, M. (2021), “Optimisation of cylindrical gear pairs: A review", Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 156, p. 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.104156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miler, D., Lončar, A., Žeželj, D. and Domitran, Z. (2017), “Influence of profile shift on the spur gear pair optimization", Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 117, pp. 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramadani, R., Belsak, A., Kegl, M., Predan, J., and Pehan, S. (2018), “Topology optimization based on design of lightweight and low vibration gear bodies”, International journal of simulation modelling, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 92–104. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM17(1)419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, M.B.. Pleguezuelos, M.. Pedrero, J.I. (2016), “Approximate equations for the meshing stiffness and the load sharing ratio of spur gears including hertzian effects”, Mechanism and Machine Theory. Vol. 109, pp. 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savsani, V., Rao, R. V. and Vakharia, D. P. (2010), “Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms", Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbruggen, F., Silvas, E. and Hofman, T. (2020), “Electric powertrain topology analysis and design for heavy-duty trucks", Energies, Vol. 13 No. 10, p. 2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakota, T., Taguchi, T. and Gen, M. (1998), “A solution method for optimal weight design problem of the gear using genetic algorithms”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 35 No. 3–4, pp. 523–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00149-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access