Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T08:39:40.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Data-driven support for CAD parts modelling based on automated estimated production planning – approach and user research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Martin Erler ,
Sebastian Langula ,
Christian Wölfel ,
Julia Schneider ,
Christiane Kunath  and
Michael Königs
Martin Erler
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Sebastian Langula
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Christian Wölfel*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Julia Schneider
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Christiane Kunath
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Michael Königs
Affiliation:
FVP Aachen, Germany
*
christian.woelfel@tu-dresden.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a data-driven approach to support decision-making in CAD modelling and to improve design for manufacturing. Based on automated estimated production planning, information is provided on possible design actions and their impact. A study was conducted on perspectives on and visualizations in CAD modelling. Requirements for a user interface of the described support system were identified. The results serve as basis for further research and development on the interaction of engineering designers with data-driven decision-making support in CAD modelling.

Keywords

design for x (DfX)data-driven design supportdecision making
Type
Design Methods and Tools
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 573 - 582
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Al-wswasi, M., Ivanov, A. & Makatsoris, H. A survey on smart automated computer-aided process planning (ACAPP) techniques. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97, 809–832 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. and Gericke, K. (2020). Pahl/Beitz Konstruktionslehre. Springer, Deutschland.Google Scholar
Casakin, H. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2015). "Mental models and creativity in engineering and architectural design teams", Design Computing and Cognition'14, Springer International Publishing, pp. 155-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulton, D.A.: Relaxing the Homogeneity Assumption in Usability Testing, in: Behavior & Information Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1-2, pp. 107 (2001)Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2004). "Expertise in design: an overview", Design studies, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 427-441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denkena, B., Lorenzen, L.-E., Charlin, F. & Dengler, B. Quo vadis Arbeitsplanung ? Industrial engineering : Fachzeitschrift des REFA-Verbandes 63, 6–11 (2010).Google Scholar
DIN (2018). DIN EN ISO 9241-11: Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion Teil 11: Gebrauchstauglichkeit: Begriffe und Konzepte, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
DIN (2020), DIN EN ISO 9241–110: Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion Teil 110: Interaktionsprinzipien, Beuth, Berlin.Google Scholar
Ehrlenspiel, K. and Meerkamm, H. (2017). “Integrierte Produktentwicklung mit Faser-Kunststoff-Verbunden,” In: May, D., Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München, pp. 1-28.Google Scholar
Erler, M. (2018), Automatisierte Hauptzeitkalkulation für das Schruppen in der mehrachsigen Fräsbearbeitung mittels oktalgraphbasierter Featureerkennung [PhD Thesis], TU Dresden.Google Scholar
Erler, M.; Koch, A.; and Brosius, A. (2023) “Determination of Largest Possible Cutter Diameter of End Mills for Arbitrarily Shaped 3-Axis Milling Features”, Production at the Leading Edge of Technology: Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the German Academic Association for Production Technology (WGP), University of Stuttgart, October 2022. Springer Nature, Cham, pp. 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18318-8_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langula, S., Erler, M., and Brosius, A. (2023). “An Efficient Method for Automated Machining Sequence Planning Using an Approximation Algorithm”, Production at the Leading Edge of Technology: Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the German Academic Association for Production Technology (WGP), University of Stuttgart, October 2022. Springer Nature, Cham, pp. 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18318-8_72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. et al. . A survey of knowledge representation methods and applications in machining process planning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 98, 3041–3059 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandolini, M., Campi, F., Favi, C., Germani, M. & Raffaeli, R. A framework for analytical cost estimation of mechanical components based on manufacturing knowledge representation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107, 1131–1151 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matta, A. K., Ranga Raju, D. & Suman, K. N. S. The Integration of CAD/CAM and Rapid Prototyping in Product Development: A Review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2, 3438–3445 (2015).Google Scholar
Niazi, A., Dai, J. S. J., Balabani, S. & Seneviratne, L. Product cost estimation: Technique classification and methodology review. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 128, 563–575 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, J.: Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html (2000)Google Scholar
Stricker, N. & Lanza, G. The concept of robustness in production systems and its correlation to disturbances. Procedia CIRP 19, 87–92 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thüring, M. and Mahlke, S. (2007). "Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction", International journal of psychology, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 253-264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virzi, R.A.: Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects is Enough?, in: Human Factors, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 457-468 (1992).Google Scholar
Wölfel, C. and Krzywinski, J. (2019). "Ansatz und Modell der User Experience cyber-physischer Systeme in professionellen Kontexten und dessen Kommunikation in Industriegüterunternehmen", Arbeit interdisziplinär: analysieren–bewerten–gestalten. 65. Kongress der Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft.Google Scholar
Matta, A. K., Ranga Raju, D. & Suman, K. N. S. The Integration of CAD/CAM and Rapid Prototyping in Product Development: A Review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2, 3438–3445 (2015).Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Smith, S. Shape Similarity Matching With Octree Representations. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 9, 034503 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z.; Chen, D. and Xie, S. (2007). Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. 2007.Google Scholar