Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T09:56:55.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing PSS Fleets – Consideration of the Product Architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

C. Rennpferdt*
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
J. A. Schneider
Affiliation:
Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany
R. Lachmayer
Affiliation:
Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany
D. Krause
Affiliation:
Hamburg University of Technology, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

By transforming from a manufacturer into a PSS provider, the business model of a company changes. In particular with service-oriented business models, the importance of tangible products alters. Instead of selling products, PSS providers need product fleets that enable the provision of services. If the manufacturer of the product and the provider of the PSS fleet are identical, the products can be designed specifically for the PSS. This paper introduces a framework that supports the design of modular PSS fleets so that the product architecture is optimised for the requirements of the fleet.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Alonso-Rasgado, T. and Thompson, G. (2006), “A rapid design process for Total Care Product creation”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 509531. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600750579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blees, C., Kipp, T., Beckmann, G. and Krause, D. (2010), “Development of Modular Product Families: Integration of Design for Variety and Modularization”, in Dagman, A. and Söderberg, R. (Eds.), NordDesign 2010: Proceedings of the 8th biannual conference NordDesign 2010, DS, Product and Production Development, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, pp. 159170.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer London, London. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, T.-R., Wang, C.-S. and Wang, C.-C. (2013), “A systematic approach for green design in modular product development”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 68 No. 9-12, pp. 27292741. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4865-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dambietz, F.M., Rennpferdt, C., Hanna, M. and Krause, D. (2021), “Using MBSE for the Enhancement of Consistency and Continuity in Modular Product-Service-System Architectures”, Systems, Vol. 9 No. 3, p. 63. http://doi.org/10.3390/systems9030063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erixon, G. (1998), “Modular Function Deployment - A method for product modularization”, PhD Thesis, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1998.Google Scholar
Fagerholt, K. (1999), “Optimal fleet design in a ship routing problem”, International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp. 453464. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.1999.tb00167.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Go, T.F., Wahab, D.A. and Hishamuddin, H. (2015), “Multiple generation life-cycles for product sustainability: the way forward”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 95, pp. 1629. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedkoop, M.J., van Halen, C.J., Te Riele, H.R. and Rommens, P.J. (1999), “Product Service systems, Ecological and Economic Basics”, Report for Dutch Ministries of environment (VROM) and economic affairs (EZ), Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 1122.Google Scholar
Greve, E., Fuchs, C., Hamraz, B., Windheim, M. and Rennpferdt, C., et al. . (2022), “Knowledge-Based Decision Support for Concept Evaluation Using the Extended Impact Model of Modular Product Families”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 12 No. 2, p. 547. http://doi.org/10.3390/app12020547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackl, J., Krause, D., Otto, K., Windheim, M. and Moon, S.K., et al. . (2020), “Impact of Modularity Decisions on a Firm's Economic Objectives”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 142 No. 4. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstenberg, F.A., Buchert, T., Bonvoisin, J., Lindow, K. and Stark, R. (2015), “Target-oriented Modularization – Addressing Sustainability Design Goals in Product Modularization”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 29, pp. 603608. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, O., Larsson, T.C. and Rönnbäck, A.Ö. (2009), “Development of product-service systems: challenges and opportunities for the manufacturing firm”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 329348. http://doi.org/10.1080/09544820903152663Google Scholar
Jara-Díaz, S., Fielbaum, A. and Gschwender, A. (2020), “Strategies for transit fleet design considering peak and off-peak periods using the single-line model”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 142, pp. 118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.09.012Google Scholar
Krause, D., Beckmann, G., Eilmus, S., Gebhardt, N. and Jonas, H., et al. . (2014), “Integrated Development of Modular Product Families: A Methods Toolkit”, in Simpson, T.W., Jiao, J., Siddique, Z. and Hölttä-Otto, K. (Eds.), Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design, Springer New York, New York, NY, pp. 245269. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, D. and Gebhardt, N. (2018), Methodische Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien: Hohe Produktvielfalt beherrschbar entwickeln, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Larsen, M.S.S., Andersen, A.-L., Nielsen, K. and Brunoe, T.D. (2018), “Modularity in Product-Service Systems: Literature Review and Future Research Directions”, in Moon, I., Lee, G.M., Park, J., Kiritsis, D. and Cieminski, G. von (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. Production Management for Data-Driven, Intelligent, Collaborative, and Sustainable Manufacturing, Vol. 535, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 150158. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99704-9_19Google Scholar
Newcomb, P.J., Bras, B. and Rosen, D.W. (1996), “Implications of Modularity on Product Design for the Life Cycle”, in Volume 4: 8th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Irvine, California, USA, 8/18/1996 - 8/22/1996, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. http://doi.org/10.1115/96-DETC/DTM-1516Google Scholar
Reim, W., Parida, V. and Örtqvist, D. (2015), “Product–Service Systems (PSS) business models and tactics – a systematic literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 97, pp. 6175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennpferdt, C., Dambietz, F.M. and Krause, D. (2021), “Business Models and Product-Service System Design - Introducing the Business Model Graph”, Proceedings of the IEEM 2021 Conference, pp. 11021106. http://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9672798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennpferdt, C., Greve, E. and Krause, D. (2019), “The Impact of Modular Product Architectures in PSS Design: A systematic Literature Review”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp. 290295. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennpferdt, C. and Krause, D. (2020), “Towards a Framework for the Design of Variety-oriented Product-Service Systems”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 13451354. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.108Google Scholar
Rennpferdt, C. and Krause, D. (2021), “Life Phases Modularisation of Product-Service Systems”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 19671976. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.458Google Scholar
Rennpferdt, C., Kuhl, J. and Krause, D. (2022), “Tools for the Variety-Oriented Product-Service System Design”, in Andersen, A.-L., Andersen, R., Brunoe, T.D., Larsen, M.S.S., Nielsen, K., Napoleone, A. and Kjeldgaard, S. (Eds.), Towards Sustainable Customization: Bridging Smart Products and Manufacturing Systems, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 798806. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90700-6_91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J.A., Gatzen, M.M. and Lachmayer, R. (2020), “The Importance of Considering Fleet Size in te Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Product Service Systems”, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 13651374. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.284Google Scholar
Schneider, J.A., Wurst, J., Gruetzmann, I., Mozgova, I. and Lachmayer, R. (2021), “Implementation of Maintenance Strategies in the Life Cycle Costing of Product-Service Systems”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 1, pp. 18271836. http://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, M.M., Jiao, R.J. and Wang, C. (2010), “Design for mass personalization”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 175178. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukker, A. (2004), “Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 246260. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, Y., Fukushige, S., Tonoike, K. and Kondoh, S. (2008), “Product modularity for life cycle design”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 1316. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.X., Wang, W.W. and Cao, S.S. (2011), “Module Design Based on Life Cycle Design”, Advanced Materials Research, 228-229, pp. 158161. http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.228-229.158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, W., Brax, S.A. and Rajala, R. (2018), “Complexity in Product-Service Systems: Review and Framework”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 73, pp. 38. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.319CrossRefGoogle Scholar