No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Gaps between reflection frameworks and students’ practice: implications for design education
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper aims to identify gaps between the reflection frameworks and students’ practice. Through a systematic literature review (PRISMA) and a qualitative survey of students, 12 reflection frameworks were reviewed, and the 13 challenges students faced at design projects in two design schools were identified. The results indicate three gaps between theory and students’ practice: skills of designers, granularities of reflection items, and supports of bridging reflection to next actions. This study provides insights for future development of support tools to bridge the gaps in design education.
- Type
- Design Education
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Ammersdörfer, T., Tartler, D., Kauffeld, S., & Inkerman, D. (2022). Reflection Canvas – An Approach to Structure Reflection Activities in Engineering Design. How Product and Manufacturing Design Enable Sustainable Companies and Societies, 12–12. https://doi.org/10.35199/NORDDESIGN2022.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumer, E. P. S., Khovanskaya, V., Matthews, M., Reynolds, L., Schwanda Sosik, V., & Gay, G. (2014). Reviewing reflection: On the use of reflection in interactive system design. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentvelzen, M., Woźniak, P. W., Herbes, P. S. F., Stefanidi, E., & Niess, J. (2022). Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies that Support Reflection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233Google Scholar
Blake, R. W. J., & Blake, R. W. (2003). Science as a way of knowing: Using Reader Response as a means to construct a personal understanding of science literature. Electronic Journal of Science Education, Vol. 7(No. 4).Google Scholar
Broadway, F., Evans, E., Cheung, H. M., Qammar, H., & Ramsier, R. (2003). Reflective Journals: An Assessment Of A Vertically Integrated Design Team Project. 2003 Annual Conference Proceedings, 8.980.1-8.980.19. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--12060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, T., & Leifer, L. (2009). Stanford's ME310 Course as an Evolution of Engineering Design.Google Scholar
Davis, D., Beyerlein, S., Thompson, P., McCormack, J., Harrison, O., Trevisan, M., Gerlick, R., & Howe, S. (2009). Assessing Design And Reflective Practice In Capstone Engineering Design Courses. 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 14.237.1-14.237.21. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--4909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Design Council. (n.d.). Framework for Innovation: Design Council's evolved Double Diamond. Retrieved May 8, 2023, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/skills-learning/tools-frameworks/framework-for-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond/Google Scholar
Geis, C., & Birkhofer, H. (2009). CHECKLISTS AS TOOLS FOR REFLECTIVE PRACTICE FOR DESIGNERS. DS 58-9: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 9 Human Behavior in Design, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24-27, 159–168.Google Scholar
Hartmann, A., Vinke-de Kruijf, J., & Van Weesep, R. (2023). Asking the right questions: The role of reflection for learning in and between projects. International Journal of Project Management, 41(5), 102494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzle, K., & Rhinow, H. (2019). The Dilemmas of Design Thinking in Innovation Projects. Project Management Journal, 50(4), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819853129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkermann, D., Gürtler, M., & Seegrün, A. (2020). RECAP – A FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT STRUCTURED REFLECTION IN ENGINEERING PROJECTS. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.99Google Scholar
Jobst, B., Thoring, K., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2020). INTRODUCING A TOOL TO SUPPORT REFLECTION THROUGH SKETCHING AND PROTOTYPING DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.263Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2021). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide. Qualitative Content Analysis, 1–100.Google Scholar
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluskwik, E., Yuezhou, W., & Lauren, S. (2022). Work-in-Progress: Understanding learners’ motivation through machine learning analysis on reflection writing. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razavian, M., Tang, A., Capilla, R., & Lago, P. (2016). In two minds: How reflections influence software design thinking: How Reflections Influence Software Design Thinking. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 28(6), 394–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1776Google Scholar
Rekonen, S., & Hassi, L. (2018). Impediments for experimentation in novice design teams. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(3–4), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1448723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reymen, I. M. M. J., Hammer, D. K., Kroes, P. A., Van Aken, J. E., Dorst, C. H., Bax, M. F. T., & Basten, T. (2006). A domain-independent descriptive design model and its application to structured reflection on design processes. Research in Engineering Design, 16(4), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-006-0011-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, A., Blake, L. P., Chen, D., Jones, M., Mao, S., Mendelson, L., & Santana, S. (2022, August). Building Better Engineers: Critical Reflection as a High Impact Practice in Design Learning. 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2018). Reflection and professional identity development in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9380-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, M. W., Hutchinson, A., & Grzebyk, T. Q. (2014). Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: Developing professional identity through reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9334-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M.A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In Product development teams (pp. 1–29). JAI Press.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access