Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T06:06:12.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analytic, Turbulent Pressure Driven Mass Loss Rates from Red Supergiants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2022

J.O. Sundqvist
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium, email: jon.sundqvist@kuleuven.be
N.D. Kee
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium, email: jon.sundqvist@kuleuven.be National Solar Observatory, 22 Ohi’a Ku St, Makawao, HI 96768, USA email: dkee@nso.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although red supergiants (RSGs) are observed to be undergoing vigorous mass loss, explaining the mechanism launching their winds has been a long-standing problem. Given the importance of mass loss to stellar evolution in this phase, this is a key uncertainty. In this contribution we present a recently published model (Kee et al. 2021) showing that turbulent pressure alone can extend the stellar atmosphere of an RSG to the degree that a wind is launched. This provides a fully analytic mass-loss prescription for RSGs. Moreover, utilising observationally inferred turbulent velocities for these objects, we find that this wind can carry an appropriate amount of mass to overall match observations. Intriguingly, when coupled to stellar evolution models the predicted mass-loss rates show that stars with initial masses above Mini∼17M may naturally evolve back to the blue and as such not end their lives as RSGs; this is also in overall good agreement with observations, here of Type II-P/L supernova progenitors. Moreover, since the proposed wind launching mechanism is not necessarily sensitive to metallicity, this could have important implications for stellar evolution predictions in low-metallicity environments.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Arroyo-Torres, B., Wittkowski, M., Chiavassa, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A50 Google Scholar
Beasor, E.R., Davies, B., Smith, N., 2021, ApJ, 922, 55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jager, C., Nieuwenhuijzen, H., & van der Hucht, K. A. 1988, A&AS,72, 259Google Scholar
Freytag, B., Steffen, M., Ludwig, H. G., et al. 2012, J. of Comp. Ph., 231, 919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, J. A., Jiang, Y.-F., & Bildsten, L. 2021, accepted for publication in ApJ, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2110.03261 Google Scholar
Gustafsson, B. & Plez, B. 1992, in Instabilities in Evolved Super- and Hypergiants, ed. C. de Jager & H. Nieuwenhuijzen, 86Google Scholar
Josselin, E. & Plez, B. 2007, A&A, 469, 671 Google Scholar
Kee, N. D., Sundqvist, J. O., Decin, L., de Koter, A., & Sana, H. 2 2021, A&A, 646, A180 Google Scholar
Levesque, E. 2017, Astrophysics of Red Supergiants IoP ebook (IoP Publishing, Bristol)Google Scholar
Lucy, L. B. 1971, ApJ, 163, 95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., & Hofmann, K. H. 2 2017, Nature, 548, 310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1958, ApJ, 128, 664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4 Google Scholar
Smartt, S. J., Eldridge, J. J., Crockett, R. M., & Maund, J. R. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar