Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T14:18:28.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the making of a PN: the interaction of a multiple stellar wind with the ISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2023

Arturo Manchado
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofsica de Canarias, Va Láctea S/N, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Departmento de Astrofsica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientficas, Spain
Eva Villaver
Affiliation:
Centro de Astrobiologa (CAB, CSIC-INTA), ESAC Campus Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692, Madrid, Spain
G. García-Segura
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronoma-UNAM, Apartado postal 877, Ensenada, 22800 Baja California, México
Luciana Bianchi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Abstract

NGC 7293, the Helix nebula, represents one of the rare instances in which theoretical predictions of stellar evolution can be accurately tested against observations since the precise parallax distance and the velocity and proper motion of the star are well known. We present numerical simulations of the formation of the Helix PN that are fully constrained by the progenitor stellar mass, stellar evolution history, and star-interstellar medium (ISM) interaction. In the simulations, multiple bow-shock structures are formed by fragmentation of the shock front where the direct interaction of the stellar wind with the ISM takes place.

Type
Contributed Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benedict, G. F., McArthur, B. E., Napiwotzki, R., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, L., Manchado, A., Forster, K. 2012, IAU Symp. 283, p. 308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Santamara, I., Manteiga, M., Manchado, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A51. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, M. A., & De Marco, O. 2013, A&A, 553, A126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJ Letters, 619, L1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. C., et al. 2007, Nature, 448, 780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. M., Mihalas, D., & Norman, M. L. 1992, ApJS, 80, 819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villaver, E., Garca-Segura, , & Manchado, A. 2002a, ApJ, 571, 880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villaver, E., Garca-Segura, G., & Manchado, A. 2003, ApJ Letters, 585, L49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R. 1994, ApJS, 92, 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar