Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:17:10.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radioactive decay of GRB-SNe at late-times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

Kuntal Misra
Affiliation:
Aryabhatta Research Institute of observational sciencES, Manora Peak, Nainital India 263 002 email: kuntal@aries.res.in
A. S. Fruchter
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD USA 21210 email: fruchter@stsci.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the late-time Hubble Space Telescope observations of two Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) associated supernovae (SNe), GRB 030329/SN 2003dh and XRF 060218/SN 2006aj. Using the multi-color data up to ~320 days after the burst, we constrain the late-time decay nature of these SNe. The decay rates of SN 2003dh are steeper than SN 2006aj. A comparison with two other GRB SNe, GRB 980425/SN 1998bw and the SN associated with XRF 020903, shows that the decay rates of SN 2003dh are similar to XRF 020903 and those of SN 2006aj are similar to SN 1998bw. The late-time decay rates are steeper than the 56Co→56Fe radioactive decay rate indicating that there is some leakage of gamma-rays. We also compare the late-time decay rates of nine type Ic SNe, including the SNe of long GRBs, Ic broad lined and normal Ics. The decay rates of the SNe sample show a remarkable similarity in I band at late-times with a scatter of ~10%.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785 Google Scholar
Bersier, D. et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 284 Google Scholar
Cano, Z. et al., 2016, arXiv: 1604.03549Google Scholar
Cobb, B. E. et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, L113 Google Scholar
Deng, J. et al. 2005, ApJ, 624, 898 Google Scholar
Fruchter, A. S. & Hook, R. N. 2002, PASP, 114, 144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galama, T. J. et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670 Google Scholar
Hjorth, J. et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847 Google Scholar
Hunter, D. J. et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 371 Google Scholar
Iwamoto, K. et al. 1998, ApJ, 534, 660 Google Scholar
Matheson, T. et al. 2003, ApJ, 599, 394 Google Scholar
Mazzali, P. A. et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1018 Google Scholar
McKenzie, E. H. et al. 1999, PASP, 111, 964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirabal, N. et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, L99 Google Scholar
Modjaz, M. et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, L21 Google Scholar
Patat, F. et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 900 Google Scholar
Pian, E. et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 1011 Google Scholar
Resmi, L. et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 477 Google Scholar
Sahu, D. K. et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 676 Google Scholar
Sollerman, J. et al. 2006, A&A, 454, 503 Google Scholar
Sollerman, J. et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, L127 Google Scholar
Stanek, K. Z. et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, L17 Google Scholar
Taubenberger, S. et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1459 Google Scholar
Tomita, H. et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenti, S. et al. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar