Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T07:37:25.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Hand-Drawn Sketching to Laser Cutting - A Proof of Concept Prototype and Pilot Study

Part of: Design Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Sampsa Kohtala  and
Martin Steinert

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sketching ideas and building physical prototypes are common in early stage product development. They are used for learning, testing ideas, proving concepts and sharing knowledge. Laser cutting is a popular tool for making physical prototypes due to its accuracy, robustness and speed. Computer aided design and vector graphics software are the main tools used for designing parts for laser cutting. Several sketch- based interfaces have been developed to support the process, using tools such as stylus pens with intuitive sketch-like commands.

A proof-of-concept prototype for capturing a hand drawn sketch and converting it to a laser cuttable file has been developed. In this pilot study we attempt to discover when drawing design by hand on paper can be better or more efficient than conventional methods, for developing physical prototypes with laser cutting in the context of early stage product development. This includes testing the accuracy of the tool, a pilot experiment comparing drawing speed and accuracy, example use cases utilizing pencil and paper, and a simple design challenge experiment.

Keywords

Early design phasesConceptual designDesign processSketchingLaser cutting
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 339 - 348
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bao, Q., Faas, D. and Yang, M. (2018), “Interplay of sketching & prototyping in early stage product design”, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, Vol. 6 No. 3-4, pp. 146–168.Google Scholar
Dow, S. P., Heddleston, K. and Klemmer, S. R. (2009), “The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints”. Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition: ACM, pp. 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640260Google Scholar
Gerstenberg, A., Sjöman, H., Reime, T., Abrahamsson, P. and Steinert, M. (2015), “A Simultaneous, Multidisciplinary Development and Design Journey–Reflections on Prototyping”. International Conference on Entertainment Computing: Springer, pp. 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8_33Google Scholar
Jensen, M. B., Blindheim, J. and Steinert, M. (2017), “Prototyping shape-changing interfaces-An evaluation of living hinges’ abilities to resemble organic, shape-changing interfaces”. DS 87-4 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol. 21-25.08.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Gross, M., Do, E. Y.-L. and Hong, J. (2012), “Sketch it, make it: sketching precise drawings for laser cutting”. CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM, pp. 1079–1082. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212390Google Scholar
KK-Software (2010), Available at: http://www.kvec.de/ (Accessed: November 6 2018).Google Scholar
Kohtala, S. M. I. (2018), “Methods for Augmenting Physical Prototype Activities in Early Stage Product Development-Development of a system designed to accelerate prototyping and learning in the early stages of product development.” Master's thesis, NTNU.Google Scholar
Kohtala, S. M. I., Erichsen, J. A. B., Sjöman, H. and Steinert, M. (2018), “Augmenting Physical Prototype Activities in Early-Stage Product Development”. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th - 17th August 2018: The Design Society.Google Scholar
Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E. and Tenenberg, J. (2008), “The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 7, https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762Google Scholar
Mueller, S., Kruck, B. and Baudisch, P. (2013), “LaserOrigami: laser-cutting 3D objects”. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: ACM, pp. 2585–2592. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479544Google Scholar
Mueller, S., Lopes, P. and Baudisch, P. (2012), “Interactive construction: interactive fabrication of functional mechanical devices”. Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology: ACM, pp. 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380191Google Scholar
Naya, F., Contero, M. and Aleixos, N. (2007), “ParSketch: a sketch-based interface for a 2D parametric geometry editor”. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Springer, pp. 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73107-8_13Google Scholar
OpenCV about (2017), Available at: https://opencv.org/about.html (Accessed: November 22 2017).Google Scholar
Sketch & Cut – Your drawing automatically cut by laser! (2014), Available at: https://www.studiodiip.com/2014/11/24/sketch-cut-your-drawing-automatically-cut-by-laser/ (Accessed: November 6 2018).Google Scholar
Slåttsveen, K., Kriesi, C., Steinert, M. and Aasland, K. E. (2018), “Experiences from a positivistic way of teaching in the fuzzy front end”. DS 93: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2018), Dyson School of Engineering, Imperial College, London. 6th-7th September 2018, pp 694–699.Google Scholar
Steinert, M. and Leifer, L. J. (2012), “‘Finding One's Way’: Re-Discovering a Hunter-Gatherer Model based on Wayfaring”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 28 No. 2, p. 251.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D. (2012), ‘Product design and development, 2000,’ New York: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar