Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T02:58:50.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation behaviour of the kinetic Cucker–Smale model with non-compact support

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2022

Xinyu Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P. R. China (20B912033@stu.hit.edu.cn, xiaopingxue@hit.edu.cn)
Xiaoping Xue
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P. R. China (20B912033@stu.hit.edu.cn, xiaopingxue@hit.edu.cn)

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the formation behaviour of the kinetic Cucker–Smale model for initial datum without compact support for the position variable. Comparing with the case of compact support, the attractive force between particles is weak. First, we obtain the existence and uniqueness of the classical solution to the kinetic Cucker–Smale model by standard approximation method. Second, by using the characteristic flow, we overcome the difficulty brought by the weak attractive force between particles through some estimates and establish the formation behaviour, i.e., consensus of velocity, of the classical solution to the kinetic Cucker–Smale model. Finally, for the measure-valued solution to the kinetic Cucker–Smale model, the formation behaviour is also established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, S., Choi, H., Ha, S.-Y. and Lee, H.. On the collision avoiding initial-configurations to the Cucker-Smale type flocking models. Commun. Math. Sci. 10 (2012), 625643.Google Scholar
Canizo, J. A., Carrillo, J. A. and Rosado, J.. A well-posedness theory in measures for some kinetic models of collective motion. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 21 (2011), 515539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. A., D’ Orsogna, M. R. and Panferov, V.. Double milling in self-propelled swarms from kinetic theory. Kinet. Relat. Models. 2 (2009), 363378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. A., Fornasier, M., Rosado, J. and Toscani, G.. Asymptotic flocking dynamics for the kinetic Cucker-Smale model. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 42 (2010), 218236.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. A., Choi, Y. P. and Hauray, M.. Local well-posedness of the generalized Cucker-Smale model with singular kernels. ESAIM Proc. Surveys. 47 (2014), 1735.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. and Yin, X.. The kinetic Cucker-smale model: well posedness and asymptotic behavior. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51 (2019), 38193853.Google Scholar
Cucker, F. and Dong, J.-G.. Avoiding collisions in flocks. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 55 (2010), 12381243.Google Scholar
Cucker, F. and Smale, S.. Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 52 (2007), 852862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cucker, F. and Smale, S.. On the mathematics of emergence. Japan. J. Math. 2 (2007), 197227.Google Scholar
Ha, S.-Y., Kim, J. and Zhang, X.. Uniform stability of the Cucker-Smale model and its application to the mean-field limit. Kinet. Relat. Models. 11 (2018), 11571181.Google Scholar
Ha, S.-Y., Kim, J., Park, J. and Zhang, X.. Complete cluster predictability of the Cucker-Smale flocking model on the real line. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 231 (2019), 319365.Google Scholar
Ha, S.-Y. and Liu, J.-G.. A simple proof of the Cucker-Smale flocking dynamics and mean-field limit. Commun. Math. Sci. 7 (2009), 297325.Google Scholar
Ha, S.-Y. and Tadmor, E.. From the particle to kinetic and hydrodynamic descriptions of flocking. Kinet. Relat. Model. 1 (2008), 415435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karper, T. K., Mellet, A. and Trivisa, K.. Existence of weak solutions to kinetic flocking models. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 45 (2013), 215243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karper, T. K., Mellet, A. and Trivisa, K., On strong local alignment in the kinetic Cucker-Smale model, in Hyperbolic Conservation Laws and Related Analysis with Applications. Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 49, Springer, 2014, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarovici, D.. The Vlasov-Poisson dynamics as the mean field limit of extended charges. Commun. Math. Phys. 347 (2016), 271289.Google Scholar
Li, Z.. Effectual leadership in flocks with hierarchy and individual preference. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 34 (2014), 36833702.Google Scholar
Li, Z. and Ha, S.-Y.. On the Cucker-Smale flocking with alternating leaders. Quart. Appl. Math. 73 (2015), 693709.Google Scholar
Li, Z. and Xue, X.. Cucker-Smale flocking under rooted leadership with fixed and switching topologies. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 70 (2010), 31563174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mucha, P. B. and Peszek, J.. The Cucker-Smale equation: singular communication weight, measure-valued solutions and weak-atomic uniqueness. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 227 (2018), 273308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peszek, J.. Existence of piecewise weak solutions of a discrete Cucker-Smale's flocking model with a singular communication weight. J. Differ. Equ. 257 (2014), 29002925.Google Scholar
Peszek, J.. Discrete Cucker-Smale flocking model with a weakly singular weight. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47 (2015), 36713686.Google Scholar
Royden, H. L.. Real analysis (New York: McMillan, 1988).Google Scholar
Shen, J.. Cucker-Smale flocking under hierarchical leadership. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68 (2007), 694719.Google Scholar
Villani, C.. Optimal Transport Old and New, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 338 (Springer: Berlin, 2009).Google Scholar
Wang, X. and Xue, X.. The flocking behavior of the infinite-particle Cucker-Smale model. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), 21652179.Google Scholar