No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Teaching Undergraduates Research Methods: A “Methods Lab” Approach
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2022
Abstract
This article introduces a “methods lab” approach to teaching undergraduates about different types of research in political science. In this approach, students are given explicit instruction on what a specific research method entails and the opportunity to practice it before conducting their own research. Methods labs can help students craft more creative research designs as well as understand the strengths and potential pitfalls associated with each method, making the subsequent process of writing a research paper or thesis easier. We provide two sample methods labs focused on conducting archival research and developing survey and interview questions. We discuss our experiences in implementing the labs in a thesis course, describe how the modular lab approach could fit into multiple types of courses, and offer suggestions for those interested in developing labs for other types of research methods.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Baglione, Lisa A. 2020. Writing a Research Paper in Political Science: A Practical Guide to Inquiry, Structure, and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Elman, Colin, Kapiszewski, Diana, and Kirilova, Dessislava. 2015. “Learning Through Research: Using Data to Train Undergraduates in Qualitative Methods.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (1): 39–43.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2014. “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science 17:225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 2017. Thinking Like a Political Scientist: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John, and Breuning, Marijke. 2008. “Assessing Assessment: Examining the Assessment Plans at 50 Political Science Departments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (1): 167–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, Janet Buttolph, Reynolds, Henry T., and Mycoff, Jason D.. 2019. Political Science Research Methods. Ninth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2013. Interview Research in Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, Lindsey. 2018. Covert Regime Change: America’s Secret Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Jonathan. 2010. “Undergraduate Research-Methods Training in Political Science: A Comparative Perspective.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1): 121–25.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael R., and Jessica, L. P. Weeks. 2013. “Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 849–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan and De Bruin supplementary material
Sullivan and De Bruin supplementary material 1
File
73 KB
Sullivan and De Bruin supplementary material
Sullivan and De Bruin supplementary material 2
File
97 KB
Sullivan and De Bruin supplementary material
Sullivan and De Bruin supplementary material 3
File
27 KB