Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T21:46:11.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 on Political Science Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Rebecca A. Glazier
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, USA
J. Cherie Strachan
Affiliation:
The University of Akron, USA

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly changed political science higher education—shifting courses and instructors online with little preparation. What might be the long-term effects of teaching through this crisis? Combining both open-ended and forced-choice survey questions with focus-group conversations, the data reveal a picture of faculty who are doing more for students and feeling strained by the efforts. Despite the challenges of teaching online during these difficult circumstances, attitudes toward online teaching did not decline universally. Those with more experience teaching online before the pandemic held a more favorable view of online teaching when they were surveyed during the pandemic. The data also show that the emotional burden on faculty increased, with female faculty members carrying a particularly heavy load. Because online classes likely will play a major role in the future of teaching political science, understanding the pandemic’s effects—both positive and negative—is critical.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akbaba, Yasemin. 2022. “On Campus and Online: Evaluating Student Engagement in the COVID-19 Era.” In Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World, ed. Lantis, Jeffrey S., 123–37. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ba, Oumar. 2021. “When Teaching Is Impossible: A Pandemic Pedagogy of Care.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 171–72. DOI:10.1017/S104909652000150X.Google Scholar
Bacow, Lawrence S., Bowen, William G., Guthrie, Kevin M., Long, Matthew P., and Lack, Kelly A.. 2012. Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in US Higher Education. New York: Ithaka S+R Consulting.Google Scholar
Conceição, Simone C. O. 2006. “Faculty Lived Experiences in the Online Environment.” Adult Education Quarterly 57 (1): 2645.10.1177/1059601106292247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionne, Kim Yi. 2019. “There’s a Gender Gap in Political Science: Our Series Examines the Problem—and Looks at Some Solutions.” Last modified August 19, 2019; accessed October 5, 2022. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/08/19/theres-gender-gap-political-science-our-series-examines-problem-looks-some-solutions.Google Scholar
Enia, Jason. 2022. “Pandemic Pedagogy: Lessons from a Decade of Teaching About Disasters.” In Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World, ed. Lantis, Jeffrey S., 95108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazier, Rebecca A. 2021. Connecting in the Online Classroom: Building Rapport between Teachers and Students. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.98266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazier, Rebecca A., and Strachan, J. Cherie 2023. “Replication Data for ‘The Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 on Political Science Teaching.’” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI: 10.7910/DVN/KUNQGF.10.7910/DVN/KUNQGFCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, Wilfrid. 2021. “Youth Anxiety and Pathological Security-Seeking in Turbulent Times.” In Teaching International Relations in a Time of Disruption, ed. Smith, Heather A. and Hornsby, David J., 143–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-56421-6_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Tim, Alejandro, Jeffery, and Brown, Abbie H.. 2009. “The Retention of Experienced Faculty in Online Distance Education Programs: Understanding Factors That Impact Their Involvement.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grussendorf, Jeannie. 2022. “Teacher Presence and Engagement: Lessons for Effective Post-Pandemic Pedagogy.” In Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World, ed. Lantis, Jeffrey S., 4761. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gümrükçü, Selin Bengi. 2022. “Teaching During the Pandemic: From Compassionate Pedagogy to Compassionate Institution.” APSA MENA Newsletter 5 (1): 610.Google Scholar
Hiltz, Starr Roxanne, Kim, Eunhee, and Shea, Peter. 2007. “Faculty Motivators and De-Motivators for Teaching Online: Results of Focus Group Interviews at One University.” 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.10.1109/HICSS.2007.226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Emma. 2021. “Toward an Ethic of Care and Inclusivity in Emergency e-Learning.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 185–87.Google Scholar
Kim, Eunji, and Patterson, Shawn. 2021. “The Pandemic and Gender Inequality in Academia.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (1): 109–16. DOI:10.1017/S1049096521001049.Google Scholar
King, Elliot, and Alperstein, Neil. 2014. Best Practices in Online Program Development: Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315857176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Marina A. 2021. “The Pedagogy and Benefits of Using Current Affairs Journals in Introductory International Relations Classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (4): 614–22. DOI:10.1080/15512169.2019.1660986.10.1080/15512169.2019.1660986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2022. Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World: From Triage to Transformation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Eric K. 2022. “Flipped Learning and the Pandemic: How to Create Group Space in the Online Classroom.” In Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World, ed. Lantis, Jeffrey S., 6378. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loepp, Eric D. 2021. “Introduction: COVID-19 and Emergency e-Learning in Political Science and International Relations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 169–71. DOI:10.1017/S1049096520001511.Google Scholar
Martel, Stéphanie, Rourke, Serena, Wade, Sydney, and Watters, Munro. 2021. “Simulating ‘Normalcy’ in a Global Pandemic: Synchronous e-Learning and the Ethics of Care in Teaching.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 173–75.Google Scholar
Meluch, Andrea L., and Hannah, Maria N.. 2021. “Communicating Compassion in Pedagogy: Lessons from COVID-19.” In Strategies for Student Support During a Global Crisis, ed. Herron, Jeffrey D. and Douglas, Taurean, 117. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michael P. A. 2021. “Concluding Thoughts: What Can(’t) We Research About Emergency e-Learning?” PS : Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 188–90.10.1017/S1049096520001560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Joseph W. 2021. “Rapidly Moving Online in a Pandemic: Intentionality, Rapport, and the Synchronous/Asynchronous Delivery Decision.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 183–85. DOI:10.1017/S1049096520001596.Google Scholar
Rosen, Amanda M. 2022. “Suddenly Teaching Online: How Teaching Excellence Centers Helped Manage New Modes of Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” In Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World, ed. Lantis, Jeffrey S., 3145. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, Julia E., Allen, I. Elaine, and Seaman, Jeff. 2018. “Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States.” Boston: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
Shalaby, Marwa, Allam, Nermin, and Buttorff, Gail J.. 2021. “Leveling the Field: Gender Inequity in Academia During COVID-19.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (4): 661–67.Google Scholar
Shea, Peter, Pickett, Alexandra, and Li, Chun Sau. 2005. “Increasing Access to Higher Education: A Study of the Diffusion of Online Teaching Among 913 College Faculty.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 6 (2). DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v6i2.238.10.19173/irrodl.v6i2.238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Heather A., and Hornsby, David J.. 2021. Teaching International Relations in a Time of Disruption. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-56421-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotto-Santiago, Sylk, Dilly, Christen, O’Leary, Heather, Craven, Hannah, Kara, Areeba, Brown, Cynthia, Kressel, Amy, Rohr-Kirchgraber, Theresa, and DiMeglio, Linda. 2021. “Reframing Academic Productivity, Promotion, and Tenure as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Faculty Development 35 (1): 1018.Google Scholar
Sun, Taiyi. 2020. “Forced Experimentation: Teaching Civic Engagement Online Amid COVID-19.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 176–78. DOI:10.1017/S1049096520001559.Google Scholar
Sweet-Cushman, Jennie. 2021. “A Format-Flexible Pedagogy of Civil Discourse.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (1): 180–81.Google Scholar
Taylor, Kirsten L. 2022. “The Pandemic and Pedagogy Experimentation: The Benefits of Ungrading.” In Active Learning in Political Science for a Post-Pandemic World, ed. Lantis, Jeffrey S., 7993. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-94713-2_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Chronicle of Higher Education . 2021. “Tenure Status of Full-Time and Part-Time Faculty Members, Fall 2019.” In The Chronicle of Higher Education. www.chronicle.com/article/tenure-status-of-full-time-and-part-time-faculty-members-fall-2019.Google Scholar
Ulmer, L. Ward, Watson, Lemuel W., and Derby, Dustin. 2007. “Perceptions of Higher Education Faculty Members on the Value of Distance Education.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education 8 (1): 5970.Google Scholar
Wingo, Nancy Pope, Ivankova, Nataliya V., and Moss, Jacqueline A.. 2017. “Faculty Perceptions About Teaching Online: Exploring the Literature Using the Technology Acceptance Model as an Organizing Framework.” Online Learning 21 (1): 1535.10.24059/olj.v21i1.761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Glazier and Strachan Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Glazier and Strachan supplementary material

Glazier and Strachan supplementary material

Download Glazier and Strachan supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 155.5 KB