Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T21:33:19.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Political Methodology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2018

Margaret E. Roberts
Margaret E. Roberts*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: What is a Political Methodologist?
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 597 - 601
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdelal, Rawi, Herrera, Yoshiko M., Iain Johnston, Alastair, and McDermott, Rose. 2006. “Identity as a Variable.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (4): 695–711.Google Scholar
Adida, Claire L., Ferree, Karen E., Posner, Daniel N., and Robinson, Amanda Lea. 2016. “Who’s Asking? Interviewer Coethnicity Effects in African Survey data.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (12): 1630–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Graeme, and Imai, Kosuke. 2012. “Statistical Analysis of List Experiments.” Political Analysis 20: 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2016. “From Pork to Policy: The Rise of Programmatic Campaigning in Japanese Elections.” The Journal of Politics 78 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Christia, Fotini, Yao, Leon, Wittels, Stephen, and Leskovec, Jure. 2015. “Yemen Calling.” Foreign Affairs, July 6. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/yemen/2015-07-06/yemen-callingGoogle Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 823–30.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. “Natural and Field Experiments: The Role of Qualitative Methods.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 6 (2): 17–23.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-based Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eggers, Andrew C., and Spirling, Arthur. 2014. “Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832–1915.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 873–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, Karen E. 2004. “Iterative approaches to R × C Ecological Inference Problems: Where They Can Go Wrong and One Quick Fix.” Political Analysis 12: 143–59.Google Scholar
Ghanem, Dalia, and Zhang, Junjie. 2014. “Effortless Perfection: Do Chinese Cities Manipulate Air Pollution Data?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68 (2): 203–25.Google Scholar
Glynn, Adam N., and Ichino, Nahomi. 2015. “Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1055–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam A., and Picci, Lucio. 2005. “Proposal for a New Measure of Corruption, Illustrated with Italian Data.” Economics & Politics 17 (1): 37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyer, James R., Peter Rosendorff, B., and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2014. “Measuring Transparency.” Political Analysis 22 (4): 413–434.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. “Field Experiments and the Political Economy of Development.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 367–78.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1990. “On Political Methodology.” Political Analysis 2: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 326–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2014. “Reverse-Engineering Censorship in China: Randomized Experimentation And Participant Observation.” Science 345 (6199): 1251722–1251722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. “Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.” Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2016. “White Man’s IR: An Intellectual Confession.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (4): 1112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97 (02): 311–331.Google Scholar
Lee, Melissa M., and Zhang, Nan. 2017. “Legibility and the Informational Foundations of State Capacity.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 118–32.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Christopher, Nielsen, Richard, Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Storer, Alex, and Tingley, Dustin. 2013. “Computer Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis 23: 254–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2015. Advances in Comparative-historical Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mebane, Walter R. Jr. 2010. “Fraud in the 2009 presidential Election in Iran?” Chance 23 (1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierskalla, Jan H., and Hollenbach, Florian M.. 2013. “Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Cell Phone Coverage on Political Violence in Africa.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 207–24.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Airoldi, Edoardo M.. 2016. “A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (515): 998–1003.Google Scholar
Shames, Shauna L., and Wise, Tess. 2017. “Gender, Diversity, and Methods in Political Science: A Theory of Selection and Survival Biases.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 811–23.Google Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 433–447.Google Scholar
Unkovic, Cait, Sen, Maya, and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2016. “Does Encouragement Matter in Improving Gender Imbalances in Technical Fields? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial.” PloS one 11 (4): e0151714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar