Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T18:04:08.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2022

Elliott Sober
Elliott Sober*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The units of selection problem, as it is discussed within evolutionary theory, recapitulates some important elements in the dispute between methodological holism and methodological individualism. Holism and individualism have for a long time occupied favored positions in the stable of old warhorses owned and operated by philosophers of social science. These particular old warhorses are thought by many to be in retirement, although there is less than universal agreement about whether holism or individualism won the battle. Part of the point I will make about group versus individual selection is that biologists, would do well not to emulate certain aspects of the holism/individualism controversy.

Type
Part II. Unity of Science— Group Selection and Sociobiology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1980 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1980 , 1980 , pp. 93 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am very grateful to James Crow, David Hull, Richard Lewontin, and William Wimsatt. Discussions with them have been invaluable to me in developing my ideas on evolutionary theory in general and on group selection in particular. The research discussed here was supported by the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation and by the Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin, Madison. I also wish to thank the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, for its hospitality during 1980-81.

References

Brodbeck, M. (ed.). (1968). Readings in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Crow, J. (1979). “Genes that Violate Mendel's Rules.” Scientific American 240(2); 134-146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J and Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. and Snyder, A. (1972). “Causal Irregularity.” Philosophy of Science 39: 69-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. (1930). The Genetioal Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1976). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Gould, S. (1980). “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?” Paleoblology 6: 119-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1980). “Individuality and Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311-332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1981). “The Herd as a Means.” In PSA 1980 Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Giere, R. N.. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Associaton. Pages 73-92.Google Scholar
Keat, R. and Urry, J. (1977). Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Leven, H., Pavlovsky, O., and Dobzhansky, T., (1954). “Interaction of the Adaptive Values in Polymorphic Experimental Populations of Drosophlla pseudoobsoura.” Evolution 8: 335-349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1970). “Extinction.” In Some Mathematical Questions in Biology, Volume 2 . Edited by Gerstenhaber, M.. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. Pages 75-108.Google Scholar
Levins, R. (1975). “Evolution in Communities Near Equilibrium.” In Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Edited by Cody, M. and Diamond, J.. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Pages 16-50.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1970). “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1978). “Adaptation.” Scientific American 229(3): 156-169.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. and Dunn, R. (1960). “The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse.” Genetics 45: 705-722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackie, J. (1974). The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mills, S. and Beatty, J. (1979). “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.” Philosophy of Science 46: 263-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (1967). “Psychological Predicates.” In Art, Mind and Religion. Edited by Capitan, W.H. and Merrill, D.D. . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Pages 37-48. (Reprinted as “The Nature of Mental States.” In Mind, Language, and Reality. (Philosophical Papers. Volume 2.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Pages 429-440.)Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1978). “The Supervenience of Biological Concepts.” Philosophy of Science 45: 368-386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1980). “Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 47: 350-383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1981a). “Evolutionary Theory and the Ontological Status of Properties.” Philosophical Studies 40: 147-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1981b). “The Principle of Parsimony.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32: 145-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. (1975). “A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 72: 646-650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, M. (1976). “Group Selection Among Laboratory Populations of Tribolium.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 73: 4604-4607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, M.(1978). “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection.” Quarterly Review of Biology 53: 101-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. (1979). “The Evolution of Social Interactions by Family Selection.” American Naturalist 113: 399-417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1980). The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1980). “Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy.” In Scientific Discovery; Case Studies. Edited by Nickles, T. . Dordrecht, North Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co. Pages 213-259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1931). “Evolution in Mendelian Populations.” Genetics 16: 97-159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1978). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. (Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. Volume IV.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. (1962). Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar