Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T07:14:32.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sedative effects on physiological and psychological measures in anxious patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Alyson J. Bond
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London
D. Colin James
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London
Malcolm H. Lader
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London

Sysnopsis

Twenty outpatients with chronic anxiety states were tested on a large battery of physiological and psychological tests after amylobarbitone sodium, chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, and medazepam given in flexible dosage and compared with a placebo. Each patient received all five treatments for two to four weeks under double-blind conditions, as part of a fully balanced design. The tests included the electroencephalogram, the auditory evoked response, skin conductance, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, the Gibson Spiral Maze, and arithmetic tests, together with psychiatrist and patient ratings. Correlations within and between the different measures were computed. The benzodiazepines depressed slow wave and increased fast wave activity of the EEG, diminished the evoked response, reduced fluctuations in the skin conductance, and decreased motor speed on the Gibson Maze. Amylobarbitone had less physiological effect but impaired performance on the Gibson Maze and arithmetic tests. Significant correlations were found between the mean Hamilton and patient ratings and the physiological measures. It is concluded that physiological changes show useful correlations with clinical effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berg, W., and Flegel, H. (1969). EEG—Untersuchung mit Medazepam, einem neuen Benzodiazepin—Derivat. Arzneimittelforschung, 19, 740.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. E., Hughes, F. W., and Forney, R. B. (1967). The influence of a new chlordiazepoxide analogue on human mental and motor performance. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 7, 330335.Google ScholarPubMed
Bond, A. J., James, D. C., and Lader, M. H. (1974). Physiological and psychological measures in anxious patients. Psychological Medicine, 4, 364373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, A. J., and Lader, M. H. (1972). Residual effects of hypnotics. Psychopharmacologia, 25, 117132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M. (1959). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 5055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, M. J., and Lader, M. H. (1971). The effects of nitrous oxide on the auditory evoked response in a reaction time task. Psychopharmacologia, 20, 201212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lader, M. H., Bond, A. J., and James, D. C. (1974). Clinical comparison of anxiolytic drug therapy. Psychological Medicine, 4, 381387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lader, M. H., and Norris, H. (1969). The effects of nitrous oxide on the human auditory evoked response. Psychopharmacologia, 16, 115127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lader, M. H., and Wing, L. (1966). Physiological Measures, Sedative Drugs and Morbid Anxiety. Maudsley Monographs No. 14. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. D. (1971). Effects of quinalbarbitone (secobarbital) and nitrazepam on the EEG in man: quantitative investigations. European Journal of Pharmacology, 14, 238249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstone, J. T., Carne, H. J., Cooper, R. M., Dell, A. J., and Salkind, M. R. (1971). The controlled evaluation of a new tranquillizing drug medazepam in the treatment of anxiety. British Journal of Clinical Practice, 25, 172174.Google ScholarPubMed
Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar