Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T12:50:54.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of food photographs as a tool for quantifying food and nutrient intakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Paula J Robson  and
M Barbara E Livingstone
Paula J Robson*
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Centre for Diet and Health, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Co Londonderry BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK
M Barbara E Livingstone
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Centre for Diet and Health, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Co Londonderry BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email p.robson@ulst.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To evaluate the errors incurred by young adults using single portion size colour food photographs to quantify foods and nutrients consumed at six meals on two non-consecutive days.

Design

Breakfast menus remained the same for the 2 days; but lunch and dinner menus varied. The amounts of food eaten by individuals were determined by weighing individual serving dishes pre- and post-consumption. The day after eating, all foods consumed were quantified in terms of fractions or multiples of the amounts shown in the food photographs.

Subjects

Thirty adult volunteers (15 male, 15 female), aged 18–36 years, completed the protocol for day one; 27 (90%) completed day two.

Results

Some foods were more difficult to quantify accurately than others. The largest error range was −38.9% to +284.6% (cheese), whereas the smallest errors were incurred for juice (−21.5% to +34.6%, day one). All subjects who consumed muesli (day one) overestimated (+3.7% to +113.7%). No other foods were consistently over-or underestimated. For foods consumed at breakfast by the same subjects on both days, individual estimation errors were inconsistent in magnitude and/or direction. At the group level, most nutrients were estimated to within ±10% of intake; exceptions were thiamin (+10.5%, day one) and vitamin E (−10.1%, day one; −15.3%, day two). Between 63% and 80% of subjects were correctly classified into tertiles on the basis of estimated intakes.

Conclusions

Despite some large food quantification errors, single portion size food photographs were effective when used to estimate nutrient intakes at the group level. It remains to be established whether, under the conditions used in this study, more photographs per food would improve estimates of nutrient intake at the individual level.

Keywords

Food photographsDiet surveysFood portion size
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 183 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2000

References

1Young, CM, Chalmers, FW, Church, HN, et al. Subject's ability to estimate food portions. Mass. Agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 1952; 469: 63–77.Google Scholar
2Lansky, D, Brownell, KD. Estimates of food quantity and calories: errors in self-report among obese patients. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1982; 35: 727–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Guthrie, HA. Selection and quantification of typical food portions by young adults. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1984; 84: 1440–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Rapp, SR, Dubbert, PM, Burkett, PA, Buttross, Y.Food portion size estimation by men with type II diabetes. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1986; 86: 249–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bolland, JE, Yuhas, JA, Bolland, TW. Estimation of food portion sizes: effectiveness of training. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1988; 88: 817–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Blake, AJ, Guthrie, HA, Smiciklas-Wright, H.Accuracy of food portion estimation by overweight and normal-weight subjects. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1989; 89(7): 962–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Wein, EE, Sabry, JH, Evers, FT. Recalled estimates of food portion size. J. Can. Diet. Assoc. 1990; 51: 400–3.Google Scholar
8Faggiano, F, Vineis, P, Cravanzola, D.Validation of a method for the estimation of food portion size. Epidemiology 1992; 3(4): 379–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Haraldsdottir, J, Tjønneland, A, Overvad, K.Validity of individual portion size estimates in a food frequency questionnaire. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1994; 23(4): 786–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Nelson, M, Atkinson, M, Darbyshire, S.Food photography I: the perception of food portion size from photographs. Br. J. Nutr. 1994; 72: 649–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Lucas, F, Niravong, M, Villeminot, S, Kaaks, R, Clavel-Chapelon, F.Estimation of food portion size using photographs: validity, strengths, weaknesses and recommendations. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 1995; 8: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Nelson, M, Atkinson, M, Darbyshire, S.Food photography II: use of food photographs for estimating portion size and the nutrient content of meals. Br. J. Nutr. 1996; 76: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Robinson, F, Morritz, W, McGuinness, P, Hackett, AF. A study of the use of a photographic food atlas to estimate served and self-served portion sizes. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 1997; 10: 117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Howat, PM, Mohan, R, Champagne, C, Monlezun, C, Wozniak, P, Bray, G.Validity and reliability of reported dietary intake data. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1994; 94: 169–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Haraldsdottir, J, Holm, L, From og Lone, V, Nielsen, S.Estimation of portion sizes with the help of models. Naringsforskning 1985; 29: 59–65.Google Scholar
16Crawley, HA. Food Portion Sizes. London: HMSO, 1988.Google Scholar
17Institute of Brain Chemistry and Human Nutrition. Foodbase. 1991.Google Scholar
18Webb, CA, Yuhas, JA. Ability of WIC clientele to estimate food quantities. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1988; 88: 601–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Bellach, B.Remarks on the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient and other association measures in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993; 47 (Suppl 2): S42–5.Google ScholarPubMed
20Bird, G, Elwood, PC. The dietary intakes of subjects estimated from photographs compared with a weighed record. Hum. Nutr. Appl. Nutr. 1993; 37A: 470–3.Google Scholar
21Brown, JE, Tharp, TM, Dahlberg-Luby, EM, et al. Videotape dietary assessment: validity, reliability, and comparison of results with 24-hour dietary recalls from elderly women in a retirement home. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1990; 90(12), 1675–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Nelson, M, Haraldsdottir, J.Food photographs: practical guidelines II. Development and use of photographic atlases for assessing food portion size. Public Health Nutr. 1998; 1(4): 231–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed