Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T12:59:14.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fast as Potoroo: Radio continuum detection of a bow-shock pulsar wind nebula powered by pulsar J1638–4713

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2024

Sanja Lazarević*
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia CSIRO Space and Astronomy, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia
Miroslav D. Filipović
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
Shi Dai
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
Roland Kothes
Affiliation:
Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council Canada, Penticton, Canada
Adeel Ahmad
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
Rami Z. E. Alsaberi
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
Joel C. F. Balzan
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
Luke A. Barnes
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
William D. Cotton
Affiliation:
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Charlottesville, VA, USA South African Radio Astronomy Observatory, Black River Park, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
Philip G. Edwards
Affiliation:
CSIRO Space and Astronomy, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia
Yjan A. Gordon
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Frank Haberl
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany
Andrew M. Hopkins
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
Bärbel S. Koribalski
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia CSIRO Space and Astronomy, Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia
Denis Leahy
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Chandreyee Maitra
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany
Marko Mićić
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Gavin Rowell
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Manami Sasaki
Affiliation:
Dr Karl Remeis Observatory, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Bamberg, Germany
Nicholas F. H. Tothill
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
Grazia Umana
Affiliation:
INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, Catania, Italy
Velibor Velović
Affiliation:
Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Sanja Lazarević; Email: s.lazarevic@westernsydney.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report the discovery of a bow-shock pulsar wind nebula (PWN), named Potoroo, and the detection of a young pulsar J1638$-$4713 that powers the nebula. We present a radio continuum study of the PWN based on 20-cm observations obtained from the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and MeerKAT. PSR J1638$-$4713 was identified using Parkes radio telescope observations at frequencies above 3 GHz. The pulsar has the second-highest dispersion measure of all known radio pulsars (1 553 pc cm$^{-3}$), a spin period of 65.74 ms and a spin-down luminosity of $\dot{E}=6.1\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The PWN has a cometary morphology and one of the greatest projected lengths among all the observed pulsar radio tails, measuring over 21 pc for an assumed distance of 10 kpc. The remarkably long tail and atypically steep radio spectral index are attributed to the interplay of a supernova reverse shock and the PWN. The originating supernova remnant is not known so far. We estimated the pulsar kick velocity to be in the range of 1 000–2 000 km s$^{-1}$ for ages between 23 and 10 kyr. The X-ray counterpart found in Chandra data, CXOU J163802.6$-$471358, shows the same tail morphology as the radio source but is shorter by a factor of 10. The peak of the X-ray emission is offset from the peak of the radio total intensity (Stokes $\rm I$) emission by approximately 4.7$^{\prime\prime}$, but coincides well with circularly polarised (Stokes $\rm V$) emission. No infrared counterpart was found.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Astronomical Society of Australia

1. Introduction

The death of a massive star via a core-collapse supernova (SN) explosion is a dramatic event that leaves behind a supernova remnant (SNR) and, in some instances, a rapidly rotating neutron star (NS) known as a pulsar. A large fraction of the pulsar rotational energy is carried away by a constant wind of ultra-relativistic particles. When the pulsar wind interacts with the ambient medium it abruptly slows down at the termination shock, beyond which the shocked wind material inflates a bubble referred to as a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) (for reviews, see Gaensler & Slane, Reference Gaensler and Slane2006; Reynolds et al., Reference Reynolds, Pavlov and Kargaltsev2017). Within the PWN, the ultra-relativistic particles travel through the magnetic field and generate non-thermal emission that can be observed across a wide range of frequencies, from radio to ${\unicode{x03B3}}$ -rays (Filipović & Tothill, Reference Filipović and Tothill2021).

PWNe produce strong radio emission through the synchrotron process. This radiation has a flat spectrum and is often highly linearly polarised due to the ordered magnetic field configuration of the PWNe (see Kothes, Reference Kothes and Torres2017). The synchrotron spectrum can extend to the X-ray band where it typically becomes steeper than in the radio because of the synchrotron cooling effect (see Kargaltsev & Pavlov, Reference Kargaltsev, Pavlov, Bassa, Wang, Cumming and Kaspi2008). The X-ray luminosity is generated by young and high-energy electrons, mainly depending on the current energy input from the pulsar. The radio luminosity, however, is created from the older electrons, reflecting the integrated history of PWNe. Gamma-ray emission in the GeV and TeV ranges has also been detected from PWNe (H.E.S.S. Collaboration et al., Reference Collaboration, Abdalla and Abramowski2018), attributed to inverse-Compton scattering. In addition to non-thermal radiation, PWNe produce optical H $\alpha$ emission when they ionise the neutral ambient medium (Bucciantini & Bandiera, Reference Bucciantini and Bandiera2001; Bucciantini, Reference Bucciantini2002).

Studying PWNe provides valuable insights into pulsars, the power sources of nebulae, radiative efficiency, properties of the surrounding medium, and the physics of the wind-medium interaction. It also contributes to understanding the distribution of the natal kick velocities that NSs acquire during the SN implosions.

The general appearance of the PWNe depends on a balance between a pulsar spin-down energy loss rate and the pressure of the ambient medium. For the pulsars that are propelled through the ambient medium at supersonic velocities, the resulting ram pressure transforms the PWN into a bow-shock. This process confines the pulsar wind in the opposite direction to that of the pulsar motion, forming a cometary-like shaped tail (Kargaltsev et al., Reference Kargaltsev, Pavlov, Klingler and Rangelov2017).

The evolution of PWNe can be divided into several phases which determine the overall observational properties of these objects (Blondin et al., Reference Blondin, Chevalier and Frierson2001; van der Swaluw et al., Reference van der Swaluw, Downes and Keegan2004). Initially, a pulsar is located near the centre of the freely expanding SNR and is typically born with a kick velocity significantly higher than the sound speed. Thus, the PWN expands and the pulsar drives a shock supersonically into the cool ejecta. In the next phase, the SNR shockwave sends a reverse shock back into the interior (Truelove & McKee, Reference Truelove and McKee1999). The interaction between the inward moving shock and the PWN is complex and causes the PWN to oscillate and reverberate, possibly leading the pulsar to leave its own PWN. The SNR reverse shock compresses the PWN by a large factor accompanied by a sudden increase in the magnetic field, which serves to burn off the highest energy electrons (Kennel & Coroniti, Reference Kennel and Coroniti1984; Bucciantini et al., Reference Bucciantini, Blondin, Del Zanna and Amato2003; Reynolds, Reference Reynolds2009). The pulsar continues to travel towards the edge of the SNR, through hot ejecta now, and will eventually break out of its parent SNR bubble, driving a shock into the interstellar medium (ISM).

Before the launch of the Chandra X-ray Observatory (Weisskopf et al., Reference Weisskopf, Tananbaum, Van Speybroeck, O’Dell, Truemper and Aschenbach2000) only a handful of PWNe had been detected, mainly because of the low angular resolution of available instruments. With improved capabilities, around 30 pulsars showing indications of supersonic motion have been identified. With the exception of the Small Magellanic Cloud DEM S5 PWN (Alsaberi et al., Reference Alsaberi, Maitra and Filipović2019), all of PWNe with a bow-shock reside in our galaxy and exhibit a large variety of morphologies (e.g. Pavan et al., Reference Pavan, Bordas and Pühlhofer2014b; Ng et al., Reference Ng, Bucciantini and Gaensler2012; Kothes et al., Reference Kothes, Reich and Safi-Harb2020).

In this paper, we report our radio continuum discovery of a bow-shock PWN (hereafter referred to as PotorooFootnote a) and the detection of a pulsar J1638 $-$ 4713 that powers the PWN. The source field has been covered during the Chandra survey of the Norma Galactic spiral arm region (Fornasini et al., Reference Fornasini, Tomsick and Bodaghee2014), and we found an X-ray counterpart with galactic coordinates $l=337^{\circ}.4883$ and $b=-0^{\circ}.1453$ , catalogued as CXOU J163802.6 $-$ 471358 (Jakobsen et al., Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014).

The X-ray emission of CXOU J163802.6 $-$ 471358 is characterised by a cometary shape, with a point source and an elongated tail extending approximately 40 $^{\prime\prime}$ (Jakobsen et al., Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014). A diffuse, jet-like feature was detected perpendicular to the cometary tail that spans 19.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ (see their Figure 1), but its significance is close to the detection limit.

Figure 1. Composite image of the Galactic plane region and Potoroo, with the red layer showing the ASKAP total intensity image at 1 368 MHz, and the green and blue layers representing WISE infrared images at 12 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m and 22 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m, respectively. Known Galactic SNRs are indicated by red circles (Green, Reference Green2019, Reference Green2022), while known Galactic HII regions are marked by green circles (Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Bania and Balser2014). The box highlights the section of deep interest. The inset is the ASKAP zoomed-in image showing Potoroo where a red cross marks the position of the X-ray source, while a red dashed line is Potoroo’s axis of symmetry, which corresponds to the tail length studied in this paper.

To estimate the distance to CXOU J163802.6 $-$ 471358, Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) measured the hydrogen column density (N $_{H}=1.5\times$ 10 $^{23}$ cm $^{-2}$ ) using joint Chandra and XMM-Newton (Jansen et al., Reference Jansen, Lumb and Altieri2001) observations. Comparison to another source in the same area, PWN HESS J1640 $-$ 465 (Lemiere et al., Reference Lemiere, Slane, Gaensler and Murray2009), with a slightly lower column density and distance of 10 kpc, led the authors to adopt the same distance to the Potoroo X-ray counterpart as a lower limit. They also reported the photon index of the X-ray source as $\Gamma$ =1.1 $^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ .

Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) found no flux variation between the Chandra and XMM-Newton observations, conducted five years apart. They calculated the luminosity of the entire source to be approximately $4.8\times10^{33}d_{10}^{2}$ erg s $^{-1}$ , with the source distance $d_{10}=d/10$ kpc. Although a pulsar search was attempted, the high background noise and poor statistics prevented the pulsation detection.

The Molonglo Galactic Plane Survey epoch-2 (MGPS-2) radio observations (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Mauch and Green2007) revealed the counterpart to the X-ray source, showing an extended tail that is aligned with the X-ray emission. Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) reported an offset between the X-ray and radio peaks of about 40 $^{\prime\prime}$ , and no infrared counterpart.

Although Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) discussed other potential source types, they suggested that the detected X-ray point source was most likely a previously unknown pulsar and the extended emission was a bow-shock tail created by ram pressure.

Our study takes advantage of large-scale radio continuum surveys obtained by new-generation telescopes such as Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and MeerKAT. These advanced instruments significantly enhance our ability to detect and investigate low surface brightness objects with detail greater than ever before. We also used the new Parkes Ultra-Wideband Low (UWL) frequency receiver system (Hobbs et al., Reference Hobbs, Manchester and Dunning2020) to search for radio pulsations. The wide frequency coverage, especially up to 4 GHz, enables us to avoid scattering and smearing due to Potoroo’s large distance.

We organised the paper as follows: Section 2 details the instruments and data used in our study; Section 3 presents our observational results which are divided into five subsections: Potoroo morphology (Subsection 3.1), radio spectrum (Subsection 3.2), polarisation analysis (Subsection 3.3), pulsar detection along with its properties (Subsection 3.4) and the origin of Potoroo (Subsection 3.5); in Section 4, we discuss the results; and finally, in Section 5, we present our concluding remarks. Throughout the paper, we use J2000 coordinates.

2. Observations and Data processing

Potoroo was detected in radio continuum surveys obtained from ASKAP (Figure 1) and MeerKAT, as well as in the X-ray data from the Chandra Observatory. High time-resolution, pulsar search-mode observations were carried out using the Parkes UWL receiver system. A summary of observations is given in Table 1. The source field has also been covered by the infrared survey from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). We make use of this survey to better understand the surrounding ISM and probe the origin of Potoroo.

Table 1. Observational details of the Potoroo data used in this work.

1 Chandra energy band is in units of keV.

2.1 The Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder

ASKAP (Johnston et al., Reference Johnston, Taylor and Bailes2008; McConnell et al., Reference McConnell, Allison and Bannister2016; Hotan et al., Reference Hotan, Bunton and Chippendale2021) observed Potoroo at two central frequencies: 944 MHz and 1 368 MHz, both with the full instantaneous bandwidth of 288 MHz in continuum mode divided into 1 MHz wide frequency channels (288 channels across the whole band). Scheduling block (SB) identifications are 32043 and 37909, respectively. SB32043 was obtained on 11 September 2021, as part of a pilot programme for the Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) survey (Norris et al., Reference Norris, Filipovic and Huynh2019, Reference Norris, Marvil and Collier2021), using 34 out of 36 available ASKAP antennas. The second block SB37909 was obtained on 5 March 2022, as a technical test designed to demonstrate the capability of the telescope (Hotan et al., Reference Hotan, Whiting, Huynh and Moss2020). During that observation, 35 antennas were operating. SB37909 has full polarisation data, while for SB32043, only Stokes $\rm I$ and $\rm V$ maps are available.

Each ASKAP antenna is 12 m in diameter and is equipped with a phased array feed (PAF) beam (Schinckel et al., Reference Schinckel, Bunton, Cornwell, Feain, Hay, Stepp, Gilmozzi and Hall2012) mounted at the primary focus, yielding about 30 deg $^2$ field of view (FoV). The 36 beams formed from the PAF elements had a hexagonal arrangement, known as ‘closepack36’, with a footprint rotation of 45 $^{\circ} $ . The pitch angle, the spacing between beams, was set to 0.90 $^{\circ} $ providing an approximately uniform sensitivity over the FoV without interleaving (Norris et al., Reference Norris, Marvil and Collier2021).

The final 944 MHz mosaic image has a synthesised beam of 16.3 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 13.3 $^{\prime\prime}$ at a position angle (PA) of 84.5 $^{\circ} $ with a local root-mean-square (rms) noise level of 131 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ . The 1 368 MHz mosaic image has a beam of 8.8 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 7.4 $^{\prime\prime}$ at a PA of 84.5 $^{\circ} $ with rms noise 68 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ . Both observations were performed with 10 hours of exposure time. Data calibration and imaging were carried out using the ASKAPsoft data processing pipeline (Guzman et al., Reference Guzman, Whiting and Voronkov2019), running at the Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre.

2.2 MeerKAT

The MeerKAT array telescope is part of South Africa’s radio observatory (Jonas, Reference Jonas2009; Jonas & MeerKAT Team, Reference Jonas2016). The array consists of 64 antennas, each having a 13.5 m diameter.

We used data taken on 26 August 2018 at a central frequency of 1 284 MHz and bandwidth of 770 MHz (L-band receiver). The observation is part of the MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey (MGPS) that surveys the entire southern Galactic Plane within the latitude range $\pm$ 1.5 $^{\circ} $ (Goedhart et al., Reference Goedhart, Cotton and Camilo2023). Observations were made in a hexagonal pattern with an offset between centres of 29.6 $^{\prime}$ for relatively uniform sensitivity. Each 8 $-$ 10 hour session observed 7 or 8 pointings, cycling among them for improved uv coverage giving roughly one hour on source for each pointing. Sixty-one antennas were used for the observations contributing to the mosaic used in this work.

Calibration and imaging of the pointing centres were as described in Mauch et al. (Reference Mauch, Cotton and Condon2020). A linear mosaic of the pointing images was made as described in Brunthaler et al. (Reference Brunthaler, Menten and Dzib2021). The resulting mosaic image has a synthesised beam of 8 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 8 $^{\prime\prime}$ and the rms noise is 56 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ . We utilised only a total-intensity image throughout the paper.

2.3 Parkes Observatory

Parkes radio telescope, also known as Murriyang, is a 64-m paraboloid single-dish antenna. On 10 September 2019, as part of project P1019 (van Jaarsveld et al., Reference van Jaarsveld, Camilo, Stappers and McBride2019), Potoroo was observed using the UWL receiver in conjunction with the Medusa backend in the pulsar search mode. The data were recorded with 2-bit sampling every 64 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ s in each of the 0.125 MHz wide frequency channels, resulting in a total of 26 624 channels covering from 704 to 4 032 MHz. The observations were carried out for a total integration time of 4 hours and only the total intensity was recorded. We performed a periodicity search using the pulsar software package PRESTOFootnote b (Ransom, Reference Ransom2001) for every 512 MHz of bandwidth and for a dispersion measure (DM) range from 0 to 2 000 pc cm $^{-3}$ . At frequencies above 3 GHz, we identified a pulsar candidate.

Follow-up observations were conducted on 12 July and 12 October 2022, using the coherently de-dispersed search mode. In this mode, data were recorded with 2-bit sampling every 64 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ s in each of the 1 MHz wide frequency channels (3 328 channels across the entire band with Medusa). We recorded full Stokes information for both follow-up observations. To calibrate these observations, we observed a pulsed noise signal injected into the signal path before the first-stage low-noise amplifiers before each observation.

The pulsar candidate, PSR J1638 $-$ 4713, was detected and confirmed in both observations with high significance. We determined the apparent spin period and DM for each observing epoch and folded the data using the DSPSR (van Straten & Bailes, Reference van Straten and Bailes2011) software package with a sub-integration length of 30 s. Data affected by narrow-band and impulsive radiofrequency interference (RFI) were manually excised using the PSRCHIVE (Hotan et al., Reference Hotan, van Straten and Manchester2004) software package. Polarisation and absolute flux calibrations of these search-mode observations were carried out following steps described in Dai et al. (Reference Dai, Lower and Bailes2019). Each observation was then averaged in time to create sub-integrations with a length of a few tens of minutes, and the pulse time of arrivals was measured for each integration using PSRCHIVE. The spin period of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 at each observing epoch was then measured using the Tempo2 software package (Hobbs et al., Reference Hobbs, Edwards and Manchester2006).

2.4 Chandra X-Ray Observatory

The extended X-ray source of Potoroo was serendipitously discovered during the Chandra survey of the Norma region of the Galactic spiral arms. The source was observed on 13 June 2011 with two exposures, 19.31 ks and 19.01 ks, with Observations software (CIAO) 12519 and 12520, respectively. The data were taken with the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer using the wide field chip (ACIS-I) operating in Very Faint (VFAINT) timed exposure mode. The ACIS-I covers a 16.9 $^{\prime}$ $\times$ 16.9 $^{\prime}$ FoV and has the on-axis spatial resolution less than 0.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ , which increases off-axis. Both observations had Potoroo positioned off-axis, less so in the ObsID 12 519, with Potoroo located $\sim$ 3.8 $^{\prime}$ away from the optical axis, compared to $\sim$ 8.4 $^{\prime}$ for the ObsID 12520.

The energy scale of the CCD chip is calibrated over the range of approximately $0.3-10$ keV. The ACIS-I has front-side-illuminated CCDs where the instrumental background dominates the spectrum for energies below 0.5 keV and above $7-8$ keV (Baganoff et al., Reference Baganoff, Maeda and Morris2003). The time resolution of the CCD chip, determined by the readout time, was 3.2 s.

We downloaded the observations from the Chandra Data Archive (CDA) and reduced the data using the Analysis of Chandra Interactive Observations software (CIAO)Footnote c version 4.15 (Fruscione et al., Reference Fruscione, McDowell, Allen, Silva and Doxsey2006) with the most recently available Chandra Calibration Database (CALDB) version 4.10.2. The standard chandra_repro tool was performed to reprocess both sets of observations and mdcopy to filter the event files from background noise. Since Potoroo has an extended structure, reducing the background noise makes fine structures more prominent. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, utilising the merge_obs tool, the observations were reprojected and combined to create a merged event file and exposure-corrected images. For the object’s offset from the optical axis, we calculated the resolution of the merged image to be 2.4 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 2.4 $^{\prime\prime}$ using the default psfmerge setting, based on the 90% point-spread function. Since no source events below 2 keV were detected, the final image covers the energy range of $2-8$ keV.

We present the archival Chandra data only for the purpose of comparing the X-ray imaging results to the new radio observations of Potoroo. The exposure-corrected and merged image is additionally smoothed with a two-dimensional Gaussian kernel and variance of ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ = 2.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ to reduce the effect of statistical fluctuation (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Radio and X-ray images of Potoroo. The left panel presents the ASKAP total intensity image at 1 368 MHz, with the beam size of 8.8 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 7.4 $^{\prime\prime}$ shown in the bottom left corner. In the middle panel, the Chandra image within the energy range of $2-8$ keV is smoothed with a two-dimensional Gaussian where ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ = 2.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ . The green contours correspond to ASKAP’s 1 368 MHz Stokes $\rm I$ image at the following levels: 0.2, 0.3, 0.8, 3, 5 mJy beam $^{-1}$ . The red box highlights the area of the zoomed-in Chandra image in the right panels, where the bottom right image has the same ASKAP contours as the middle image and the top right image is overlaid with red contours from ASKAP 944 MHz image of circular polarisation. The significances of the red contours are 3, 4 and 5 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ , where 1 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ =24 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ . The white “x” marks the X-ray peak, while the yellow “x” marks the radio peak. The red dashed lines denote the axis of symmetry of Potoroo.

2.5 Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer

The WISE satellite (Wright et al., Reference Wright, Eisenhardt and Mainzer2010) performed all-sky mid-infrared surveys in four photometric bands centred on 3.4 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m, 4.6 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m, 12 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m, and 22 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m with an angular resolution of 6.1 $^{\prime\prime}$ , 6.4 $^{\prime\prime}$ , 6.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ , and 12.0 $^{\prime\prime}$ , respectively. The higher two bands are sensitive to stars, while 12 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m and 22 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m maps contain a wealth of gas and dust information. With high sensitivity, the satellite was able to detect over 8 000 HII regions in the Galactic plane.

We used the WISE emission maps at 12 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m and 22 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m and the HII regions catalogue (Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Bania and Balser2014) to search for the Potoroo parent SNR. Synchrotron non-thermal emission, such as from shell SNRs, should not correlate with the mid-infrared thermal emission, which makes a powerful tool for distinguishing SNRs from HII regions. However, in complex parts of the ISM, such as the Potoroo’s surrounding environment, other emissions may be present in the line of sight that could lead to the misclassification of objects.

3. Results of Potoroo study

Combining ASKAP radio continuum data with the infrared maps from the WISE survey (Figure 1) and Chandra X-ray image (Figure 2), we can confidently classify Potoroo as a bow-shock PWN positioned within the plane of our galaxy.

The distance to Potoroo was previously estimated by Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) based on foreground HI absorption, suggesting a lower bound of 10 kpc. This places Potoroo in the Norma spiral arm on the far side of the Galaxy (Norma II region). We also consider another potential distance of 7.6 kpc, calculated from the Potoroo pulsar’s DM, as discussed in Section 4.1.

Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) reported the X-ray source position coordinates as RA(J2000) = 16 $^{\rm h}$ 38 $^{\rm m}$ 02.7 $^{\rm s}$ , Dec(J2000) = $-$ 47 $^{\circ} $ 13 $^{\prime}$ 58.4 $^{\prime\prime}$ , peaking at an energy maximum of $\approx$ 5 keV. The radio position of Potoroo, estimated at the peak of radio brightness, has coordinates: RA(J2000) = 16 $^{\rm h}$ 38 $^{\rm m}$ 02.6 $^{\rm s}$ and Dec(J2000) = $-$ 47 $^{\circ} $ 13 $^{\prime}$ 53.8 $^{\prime\prime}$ . We measured the flux densities for the entire object using the techniques described in Filipović et al. (Reference Filipović, Payne and Alsaberi2022). After convolving images to the same resolution as the lowest-resolution image, we determined total radio flux densities for the carefully selected 3 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ -source region, accounting for the local background. These measurements, with a flux density measurement scale error of approximately 10% of the overall flux density, are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Peak flux densities $S_{\rm peak}$ and integrated flux densities $S_{{\unicode{x03BD}}}$ of Potoroo at three frequencies. The average polarised intensity PI and fractional polarisation FP, as well as the peak of fractional polarisation $FP_{\rm peak}$ are quantified only for 1 368 MHz ASKAP data.

1 Integrated values are measured for the selected regions that match the 3 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ source significance where ${\unicode{x03C3}}_{1\,368\,MHz}$ = 68 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ . The polygonal contours are created with a polygon and the values are calculated with the statistics package from Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy (CARTA) (Comrie et al., Reference Comrie, Wang and Hsu2021).

The positional difference between the X-ray and radio peaks is 4.7 $^{\prime\prime}$ , as shown at the bottom right panel of Figure 2 and Figure 3. Given the uncertainty for the Chandra position of 0.36 $^{\prime\prime}$ (Fornasini et al., Reference Fornasini, Tomsick and Bodaghee2014) and the astrometric precision for ASKAP of about 0.6 $^{\prime\prime}$ (Gürkan et al., Reference Gürkan, Prandoni and O’Brien2022) for both RA and Dec, the offset must be real. Such an offset has already been seen in other bow-shock PWNe like the Lighthouse nebula (Pavan et al., Reference Pavan, Bordas and Pühlhofer2014a) and G319.9 $-$ 0.7 (Ng et al., Reference Ng, Gaensler, Chatterjee and Johnston2010).

Figure 3. Profiles of Potoroo along the axis of symmetry as a function of the distance from the Stokes $\rm V$ peak. The Stokes $\rm I$ profile at 1 368 MHz is represented with a black solid line, while the Stokes $\rm V$ profile at 944 MHz is represented with the red dotted line. Both profiles are given in [mJy beam $^{-1}$ ] units and correspond to the left y-axes, respectively. The X-ray intensity profile in the 2 – 8 keV energy range is shown by the black dashed line and corresponds to the right y-axis. The grey box indicates the region of the zoomed-in plot showing the peaks of the Stokes $\rm V$ , X-ray and Stokes $\rm I$ profiles, listed in order of appearance. The orange and red shaded boxes represent the pixel increment of the ASKAP and Chandra data. The horisontal dashed blue line denotes the noise level, and the red “x” marks the end of the tail studied in this paper.

Investigating the 944 MHz ASKAP circular polarisation (Stokes $\rm V$ ) image of Potoroo, we observe a similar positional difference between the Stokes $\rm V$ peak and the peak of the total intensity image (Stokes $\rm I$ ). Additionally, the Stokes $\rm V$ peak aligns well with the peak of the X-ray source. Both comparisons are shown in Figure 2, right and Figure 3. The circularly polarised emission is detected with a significance greater than 5 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ , with a local rms noise of about 24 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy beam $^{-1}$ . The fractional circular polarisation, expressed as the V/I ratio, is slightly higher than 1 $\%$ . Despite the weak circular polarisation, it cannot be attributed to leakage from Stokes $\rm I$ , as the peak of the circularly polarised emission is offset from the total intensity peak. Moreover, the leakage across the entire ASKAP FoV is typically around 0.7 $\%$ .

The circularly polarised emission is almost unique to stellar objects (Dai et al., Reference Dai, Hobbs and Manchester2015; Lenc et al., Reference Lenc, Murphy, Lynch, Kaplan and Zhang2018), although it is not universal among them (Gould & Lyne, Reference Gould and Lyne1998). However, circularly polarised sources that lack clear optical or infrared association are strong pulsar candidates. Motivated by this, together with the far distance and potentially high dispersion of Potoroo’s pulsar, we reprocessed the archival Parkes data, focusing on the high-frequency band, rather than the L-band typically used for pulsar detection. We identified and confirmed a periodic signal from the pulsar at a DM of 1 553 pc cm $^{-3}$ with a spin period of 65.74 ms. For more details on the PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 detection and its properties, see Sections 3.4 and 4.4.

3.1 Potoroo morphology

The morphology of PWNe is mainly determined by the properties of the ambient medium and the characteristics of the pulsar that powers the PWN. The striking cometary structure of Potoroo is the typical shape of a PWN whose pulsar is moving supersonically through the ambient medium. In this case, the ram pressure exerted by the oncoming medium confines and channels the pulsar wind in the opposite direction to the pulsar motion, as shown in Figure 2, left.

Visual inspection of the radio total intensity images reveals an extended morphological structure of Potoroo, characterised by two distinct components: a compact and bright head followed by a highly elongated tail. The X-ray source has a similar structure but on a different length scale. In addition to the mismatch of the radio and X-ray intensity peaks, Figure 3 shows that the radio emission extends beyond the X-ray emission. This extension is attributed to the synchrotron ageing effect of relativistic electrons, where low-energy electrons lose energy at a slower rate, resulting in longer lifetimes that allow them to travel farther from the pulsar.

Potoroo is roughly conical in shape. The radio source extends approximately 7.2 $^{\prime}$ along the PA of 0 $^{\circ} $ , equivalent to a physical size of 21 pc considering the distance of 10 kpc. After a dip in intensity behind the head, the brightness increases, peaking at a distance of about 0.8 $^{\prime}$ . Following this peak, it rapidly dims and remains relatively unchanged. The bright structure (hereafter the main body) covers the first 1.9 $^{\prime}$ of the object. The tail has a hazy termination due to the complexity of the surrounding medium. Our estimation of the source end is based on the morphological appearance and loss of the tail shape (Figure 2). Additionally, this estimation aligns with a significant increment in the slope of the brightness profile influenced by ambient emission (Figure 3). However, we could not exclude that the source is longer than that. In contrast, the X-ray tail brightness fades to background levels at approximately 0.67 $^{\prime}$ (2 pc for the distance of 10 kpc) from the pulsar.

The radio shape of the source is narrow overall, ranging from 18 $^{\prime\prime}$ $-$ 24 $^{\prime\prime}$ , until it abruptly widens by a factor of 3 at a distance of about 4.4 $^{\prime}$ . The rapid change in tail width is likely due to an ambient density discontinuity. As the ambient density increases along a pulsar path, the ram pressure also increases, causing the PWN to adopt a thinner shape (Yoon & Heinz, Reference Yoon and Heinz2017). However, if the ambient density remains unchanged over a sufficient distance, the tail flattens again, as observed in other parts of Potoroo.

The Chandra observation of Potoroo has also detected a diffuse feature perpendicular to the PWN axis, extending approximately 19 $^{\prime\prime}$ (see Figure 2, right). However, interpreting this feature is challenging due to limited statistical data. Likewise, the radio emission data do not reveal any visible counterpart, similar to other objects with more prominent X-ray misaligned outflows, such as the Lighthouse (Pavan et al., Reference Pavan, Bordas and Pühlhofer2014a; Klingler et al., 2022) or Guitar nebula (Hui & Becker, Reference Hui and Becker2007; de Vries et al., Reference de Vries, Romani and Kargaltsev2022).

3.2 Radio continuum spectrum of Potoroo

PWNe emit synchrotron radiation detectable across the electromagnetic spectrum, from radio to beyond the X-ray frequencies. In the radio band, the synchrotron emission is characterised by a power-law distribution of flux density, expressed as S $_{{\unicode{x03BD}}}\propto{\unicode{x03BD}}^{{\unicode{x03B1}}}$ . PWNe typically have flat spectra with a spectral index in the range of $-$ 0.3 $<{\unicode{x03B1}}<$ 0 (Weiler & Sramek, Reference Weiler and Sramek1988; Kothes, Reference Kothes and Torres2017). In rare cases, PWNe spectra can be steeper, with the index as low as $-$ 0.7, as observed, for instance, in Dragonfly ( ${\unicode{x03B1}}=-0.74,$ Jin et al., Reference Jin, Ng, Roberts and Li2023).

A spectral index map of Potoroo was created using Stokes $\rm I$ images at 944, 1 284 and 1 368 MHz with the MIRIAD software package (Sault et al., Reference Sault, Teuben, Wright, Shaw, Payne and Hayes1995). To maintain pixel consistency across all bands, the ASKAP images were first regridded to match the finest pixel grid, 1.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 1.5 $^{\prime\prime}$ , of the MeerKAT 1 284 MHz image. Then, all images were convolved to the lowest resolution of the dataset, corresponding to the resolution of the ASKAP 944 MHz image with a beam size of 16.3 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 13.3 $^{\prime\prime}$ . The local 1 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ rms noise levels of the individual images were measured using the rms statistics tool in the CARTA software. These measurements were performed on carefully selected regions, excluding all obvious sources. The convolved images were combined, and a spectrum was fitted using a simple weighted linear regression algorithm. The algorithm modelled pixels with flux densities more significant than 5 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ rms mask thresholds. The flux densities of the same pixel for all bands were fitted, and the resulting slope of the best line fit was stored in a new image. The distribution of these slopes forms the spectral index map of Potoroo, as shown in Figure 4. Pixels with flux densities less than the 5 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ threshold at least one frequency have default NaN values, do not contribute to future calculations, and are represented as a white background.

Figure 4. Spectral index map created using the ASKAP total intensity images at 944 and 1 368 MHz, and the MeerKAT image at 1 284 MHz. The map is overlaid with the same radio contours as presented in Figure 2, middle panel. In the bottom left corner, the synthesised beam size, 16.3 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 13.3 $^{\prime\prime}$ , is given by a grey ellipse. The boxes indicate specific regions for which spectral indices are calculated: the main body (red box), the diffuse region (blue box) and the entire object (black dotted box).

The average spectral index measured across Potoroo is $-$ 1.26, with a standard deviation of 0.04. The measurement was obtained using the spectral index map for the region marked with the black dotted box in Figure 4. The average value is calculated using the mean statistics tool in the CARTA.

The overall spectral index we obtained is significantly lower than the typical values for PWNe, but it aligns with our expectations for the entire object, covering both the bright and diffuse parts. The steepest section of the Potoroo spectral map corresponds to the large, diffuse area of the tail (marked with the blue box in Figure 4), with an average spectral index of $-$ 1.42 $\pm$ 0.04. Consequently, the overall spectral index steepens considerably when the diffuse part is included. However, if we only consider the main body (marked with the red box), the calculated average spectral index is $-$ 0.21 $\pm$ 0.02. This value is consistent with most PWNe, including the Crab (α =–0.27, Storm & Greidanus, Reference Storm and Greidanus1992), G319.9–0.7 (α = –0.26, Ng et al., Reference Ng, Gaensler, Chatterjee and Johnston2010) and the Boomerang (α = –0.11, Kothes et al., Reference Kothes, Reich and Uyanker2006). In Section 4.3, we discuss these radio spectrum results and provide a comparison with the X-ray spectrum.

3.3 Polarisation analysis

The flat spectral index of PWNe is similar to optically thin thermal emission from HII regions. However, unlike thermal emission, synchrotron radiation in PWNe is linearly polarised, with the degree of polarisation ranging from a few per cent to more than 30% (e.g. Mitchell & Gelfand, Reference Mitchell and Gelfand2022). Typically, the magnetic field within PWNe is assumed to be toroidal (van der Swaluw, Reference van der Swaluw2003; Porth et al., Reference Porth, Buehler and Olmi2017). To investigate the internal magnetic field of PWNe, we need to separate internal Faraday rotation from foreground effects. This process usually requires using three frequencies for accurate measurements.

Polarisation analysis of Potoroo was performed using ASKAP 1 368 MHz data only, as no Stokes $\rm Q$ and $\rm U$ data were available at any other frequency. Due to low signal-to-noise ratios, the full resolution polarisation Stokes $\rm Q$ and $\rm U$ images were convolved to a common resolution of 10 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 10 $^{\prime\prime}$ . The polarisation intensity, fractional polarisation, and polarisation angle maps, along with their errors, were calculated using the standard MIRIAD task impol. Only pixels exceeding 5 ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ noise mask were considered. The resulting maps are presented in Figure 5, and the integrated polarisation intensity, fractional polarisation, and peak fractional polarisation are summarised in Table 2.

Figure 5. Polarisation intensity (left) and fractional polarisation (middle) maps of Potoroo at 1 368 MHz are shown. The orange ellipses in the bottom left corner represent the synthesised beam with the size of 10 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 10 $^{\prime\prime}$ . Polarisation vectors in the observed electric field direction overlay the grey-scale Stokes $\rm I$ image (right). The plotted vectors are of equal length and approximately half the beam size apart. All images have the same superimposed contours as used in the middle panel of Figure 2.

The left panel of Figure 5 shows that the linear polarised emission is strongest toward the head and bright features of Potoroo’s tail. It is not surprising that the polarised intensity correlates with the total intensity. There seems to be patches of polarised emission outside of the bright region of the PWN, associated with the diffuse part of the tail. However, this emission is too faint to be properly quantified.

The middle and right panels of Figure 5 display the fractional polarisation map and polarisation vectors in the observed electric field direction, overlaying the Stokes $\rm I$ image. The vector lengths are left unscaled for clarity. Our analysis reveals that the polarisation fraction for the entire Potoroo object can reach up to 24%, with an average value below 7%. Focusing solely on the main body, the area with a high signal-to-noise ratio, we observe weak polarisation of approximately 2%, with a peak of about 6% and highly ordered polarisation vectors. The overall lower fractional polarisation could be attributed to internal Faraday rotation, which can cause significant depolarisation at lower frequencies (e.g. Kothes et al., Reference Kothes, Reich and Uyanker2006).

The polarisation E-vectors observed in the vicinity of the place of origin exhibit a parallel orientation relative to the Potoroo axis, indicating magnetic field vectors running in the tangential direction. This magnetic field geometry is similar to the findings in G319.9 $-$ 0.7 (Ng et al., Reference Ng, Gaensler, Chatterjee and Johnston2010) and Boomerang (Kothes et al., Reference Kothes, Reich and Uyanker2006). In contrast, for the Mouse (Yusef-Zadeh & Gaensler, Reference Yusef-Zadeh and Gaensler2005) and G315.9 $-$ 0.0 (the Frying Pan SNR, Ng et al., Reference Ng, Bucciantini and Gaensler2012), the magnetic field shows a parallel alignment with the tail. The polarisation vectors of Potoroo switch orientation with the distance from the pulsar and become disordered, but some radial tendencies can be seen. This change is also detected in G319.9 $-$ 0.7 but not in G315.9 $-$ 0.0.

It is important to note that polarisation measurements should be considered as indications only, as we used Stokes $\rm Q$ and $\rm U$ maps at one frequency. Without additional data, a precise determination of Faraday rotation and magnetic field properties is not possible. The complete polarisation study will be presented in a subsequent paper.

3.4 Detection of PSR J1638–4713

PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 has a spin period of 65.74 ms and the second-highest DM of all known radio pulsars. Its DM of 1 553 pc cm $^{-3}$ is only exceded by the Galactic Centre magnetar (PSR J1745–2900, Eatough et al., Reference Eatough, Falcke and Karuppusamy2013). According to the YMW16Footnote d electron density model (Yao et al., Reference Yao, Manchester and Wang2017), this gives a DM distance of ${\sim}7.6$ kpc, although this could be highly uncertain considering the complexity in the Galactic plane.

The large DM results in the strong scattering we observed in PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 and its pulse is completely scattered below $\sim$ 2 500 MHz (Figure 6). This explains why this pulsar was not discovered by previous pulsar surveys. We measured the scattering timescale to be $6.2\pm0.7$ ms at 3 700 MHz by fitting the pulse profile with a Gaussian intrinsic pulse profile convolved with an exponential tail (e.g. Bai et al., Reference Bai, Dai and Zhi2022). Assuming that the scattering timescale scales as ${\unicode{x03BD}}^{-4}$ , we estimated the scattering timescale to be $\sim$ 70 ms at 2 GHz, which is longer than the pulsar spin period and explains its non-detection at lower frequencies.

Figure 6. The pulse profile (top panel) and frequency spectrum (bottom panel) of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713, the 65.74 ms pulsar discovered in the Potoroo PWN with the Parkes UWL at 3 GHz. The pulse profile has been corrected for the measured DM of 1 553 pc cm $^{-3}$ . Greyed out horizontal bands, such as at a frequency of 3 456 MHz, represent data flagged to remove RFI.

After averaging frequencies from 2 496 to 4 032 MHz, we measured a pulsar flux density of $226\pm5\,{\unicode{x03BC}}$ Jy at 3 264 MHz. This is much smaller than the continuum flux density of Potoroo (see Table 2) and suggests that the observed radio continuum emission is dominated by the PWN. No polarised signal has been detected in the pulsed emission so far. Our current Parkes observations are not sensitive enough to detect the circularly polarised emission of ${\sim}0.05$ mJy, detected in continuum images.

In Figure 7, we show the measured spin period of the pulsar J1638 $-$ 4713 as a function of time. We can clearly see the gradual spin-down of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 over the course of ${\sim}3$ yr. To estimate the spin-down rate of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713, we fitted a constant spin-down rate (i.e. $\dot{P}$ ) to our measurements and obtained $\dot{P}=4.407(8)\times10^{-14}$ . According to canonical pulsar spin-down models (e.g. Lorimer & Kramer, Reference Lorimer and Kramer2004), we estimated the characteristic pulsar age ${\unicode{x03C4}}=P/2\dot{P}\approx24\ 000$ yr, the characteristic magnetic field $B_{\rm s}\approx1.7\times10^{12}$ G and spin-down luminosity of $\dot{E}\approx6.1\times10^{36}$ erg s $^{-1}$ . These parameters indicate that PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 is a young pulsar with high spin-down luminosity, which is consistent with our other observations about Potoroo.

Figure 7. Pulsar spin period as a function of time. The dot-dashed line shows a linear fit, which gives a measure of the spin-down, $\dot{P}=4.4\times$ 10 $^{14}$ s/s.

3.5 Unknown origin of Potoroo

Pulsars are expected to originate from the explosion of a massive star when its core undergoes a rapid implosion. The explosion can give the NS a significant kick, causing it to move away from its birthplace at high speeds (Lai, Reference Lai, Höflich, Kumar and Wheeler2004). We often observe a pulsar’s trailing emissions pointing back to its origin. However, in the case of Potoroo, we were not able to associate the PWN with any known SNR or detect any sign of a remnant nebula from the explosion of the progenitor star. We also considered the possibility of an off-centre explosion and asymmetries in the surrounding medium. Nevertheless, this is not a unique case as similar examples, PWNe without clear origins, have been observed, for example, G319.9-0.7 (Ng et al., Reference Ng, Gaensler, Chatterjee and Johnston2010) and the Mouse (Klingler et al., Reference Klingler, Kargaltsev and Pavlov2018).

Figure 1 displays the mid-infrared view from WISE using the ISM-sensitive bands (12 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m in green and 22 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$ m in blue image layers), alongside the radio continuum view (red layer) of the Galactic plane region in the vicinity of Potoroo. Radio emission from SNR is primarily synchrotron and should lack clear mid-infrared counterparts. However, a large emission lump located behind the Potoroo trail shows a strong correlation between infrared and radio, indicating its thermal nature originating from HII regions. Moreover, the superposition of the known HII regions (green circles) confirms the previous. No clear evidence has been found for a shell marking the location of the expanding SNR shockwave outside the PWN.

The absence of an apparent parent SNR could be explained by Potoroo’s position in the far Norma arm, known for its abundance of dense molecular clouds, gas, and dust (Dame et al., Reference Dame, Hartmann and Thaddeus2001). These components could potentially obscure emissions coming from behind (Ball et al., Reference Ball, Kothes and Rosolowsky2023). In Section 4.1, we discuss further the possible origins of Potoroo.

4. Discussion

Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) detected extended X-ray emission in the Norma arm using Chandra survey data and tentatively classified it as a bow-shock tail PWN. In addition to X-ray, the authors used radio data of the same field with the highest available resolution at that time, 60 $^{\prime\prime}$ $\times$ 45 $^{\prime\prime}$ for the particular MGPS-2 mosaic image at 843 MHz, and found a radio trail coinciding with the X-ray peak position (see Jakobsen et al., Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014, Figure 5). No radio structure could be resolved. With the recent development of radio telescopes which offer superior sensitivity and high-resolution capabilities, we are able to observe the complex structure of Potoroo in greater detail. Based on the results from the previous section, we can confidently classify Potoroo as a member of a small yet growing group of supersonic pulsars driving a bow-shock through the ambient medium.

4.1 How far has Potoroo travelled?

The distance to Potoroo was determined using two different techniques. The first technique involved measuring atomic hydrogen absorption from the spectral fit of the entire X-ray source and comparing it to other objects in the same area. This method suggests that Potoroo is located in a far Norma II region, with a minimum distance of 10 kpc. The second technique involved using the YMW16 model which calculates the density of Galactic electrons and estimates the distance based on the pulsar’s DM. The YMW16 model yielded a distance of 7.6 kpc with an uncertainty of 20% (Yao et al., Reference Yao, Manchester and Wang2017). However, it’s important to note that our understanding of the distribution of free electrons weakens at large distances, particularly near the Galactic centre. The actual distance to Potoroo may have a larger error than the estimated 20%.

Kothes & Dougherty (Reference Kothes and Dougherty2007) calculated the kinematic distances to the Galactic spiral arms using a value for the Galactic centre of R $_{\odot}=7.6$ kpc. Based on their calculations, the line of sight passes through the Norma arm at distances of 4.9 and 11.5 kpc with uncertainties of approximately $\pm1$ kpc. Given this and considering that distance estimates based on pulsar DM often underestimate the true value, we adopt a distance to Potoroo of 10 kpc as a reasonable assumption and scale all distance-dependent quantities accordingly.

Potoroo is likely a mature nebula whose pulsar received enough of a natal kick to travel away from the centre of its parent SN explosion, and the well-defined outer edges of the nebula suggest that Potoroo has interacted with the reverse shock of the SNR. The duration for the reverse shock to reach maximum strength and dissipate varies depending on factors such as the density of the surrounding medium and the energy of the explosion. Previous studies suggest that, in denser environments, the reverse front can take around 10 000 years to make its way back to the centre (Blondin et al., Reference Blondin, Chevalier and Frierson2001; van der Swaluw et al., Reference van der Swaluw, Achterberg, Gallant and Tóth2001; van der Swaluw, Reference van der Swaluw2004). We have used this estimation as the minimum age for Potoroo.

Although the Potoroo pulsar cannot be resolved in radio continuum images, the flat spectrum of the nebula close to the pulsar suggests the presence of a young, energetic electron population. The radio emission produced by these electrons indicates that the current energy input from the pulsar is significant for the total energy content of the nebula. According to Blondin et al. (Reference Blondin, Chevalier and Frierson2001), the energy input from a pulsar becomes negligible when the nebula’s age is comparable to the characteristic age of the pulsar. Since the current characteristic age of the pulsar is approximately 23 000 years and the energy input is still significant, we can infer that Potoroo is much younger than 24 000 years.

Table 3 presents various SNR ages, ranging from 7.5 to 30 kyr, that were used to estimate the transverse velocities of the pulsar. We also varied the travelled distances (one, two, and three times the tail size) to examine the location of the parent SNR. Assuming no inclination with respect to the plane of the sky, we calculated the velocities using the formula $V=2\,d\,t^{-1}\rm tan$ $({\unicode{x03B8}}/2)$ . As ${\unicode{x03B8}}\ll1$ , the relation simplifies to $V=2\,845.8\,d_{10}\,{\unicode{x03B8}}_{\ast}\,t^{-1}_{\ast}$ , where $d_{10}$ is the distance to Potoroo in units of 10 kpc, ${\unicode{x03B8}}_{\ast}$ corresponds to the angular length for a given travelled distance in arcmin, and $t_{\ast}$ stores the probing ages in kyr.

Table 3. Natal kick velocities V of the Potoroo pulsar derived as a function of SNR age and travel lengths correspond to one, two, and three times the tail sizes. The adopted distance to Potoroo is 10 kpc. The analysis also includes the case of SNR G338.1+0.4 at a distance of 6.2 kpc. Reasonable values are highlighted in bold.

The study of Kargaltsev et al. (Reference Kargaltsev, Pavlov, Klingler and Rangelov2017) provides a list of kick velocities for bow-shock PWNe (see their Table 1), which varies from 60 km s $^{-1}$ to around 2 000 km s $^{-1}$ . The upper limit of this range for the projected velocity of Potoroo suggests that a minimum age of 10 000 years is consistent with previous estimates.

We also investigated the pulsar velocity for the case of Potoroo association with SNR G338.1+0.4 (Shaver & Goss, Reference Shaver and Goss1970; Whiteoak & Green, Reference Whiteoak and Green1996), since the trail emission appears to point towards the SNR geometrical centre (Figure 1). Distances to G338.1+0.4 were reported as 6.4 kpc (Shaver & Goss, Reference Shaver and Goss1970), 9.9 kpc (Case & Bhattacharya, Reference Case and Bhattacharya1998), 11.9 kpc (Stupar et al., Reference Stupar, Filipović and Parker2007), and 6.2 kpc (Pavlovic et al., Reference Pavlovic, Dobardzic, Vukotic and Urosevic2014), all derived using the brightness-to-diameter ( $\Sigma$ –D) relation. Given the large angular separation of approximately 50 $^{\prime}$ , it is highly unlikely for G338.1+0.4 to be the parent SNR of Potoroo even if they were as close as 6.2 kpc (Table 3).

Our analysis suggests that the progenitor star likely exploded within a distance no greater than twice the size of the Potoroo tail, with the natal kick velocity well exceeding 1 000 km s $^{-1}$ . Identifying a parent candidate in the chosen area is challenging due to the extreme density of HII regions. The high concentration of thermal emission in these regions may hinder the detection of any emission from the SNR, as discussed in Section 3.5. Therefore, identifying the origin of Potoroo will require further observations and analyses.

4.2 Potoroo’s tail lengths

The observed sizes of Potoroo in radio and X-ray data are approximately 7.2 $^{\prime}$ and 0.67 $^{\prime}$ , respectively. The size difference is attributed to the synchrotron ageing of relativistic particles generated by a fast-moving pulsar. The X-ray-emitting particles have a shorter lifespan and smaller spatial extent compared to the radio-emitting particles. In contrast, the radio-emitting particles persist for a longer time and form a larger, more diffuse structure that extends further away from the X-ray emission region.

To estimate the physical length of Potoroo’s tails, we converted the angular sizes to minimal lengths of 21 pc and 2 pc for radio and X-ray sources, respectively. However, we believe that the tails may be longer than these estimates. The X-ray emission is only detectable above 2 keV likely due to the severe absorbing column and the emission from a possibly longer tail is blended into the background. On the other hand, the radio tail is well defined until it reaches the complexity of the ISM, beyond which we cannot confidently identify the Potoroo tail.

Among all the observed pulsar tails, Potoroo stands out with a projected radio length of 21 pc, making it the longest observed PWN. The PWN of PSR J1437 $-$ 5959, associated with the Frying Pan SNR, has a similar radio extent of over 20 pc (Camilo et al., Reference Camilo, Ng and Gaensler2009), but is not visible in X-rays. The projected velocity of the driving pulsar is $\sim$ 1 000 km s $^{-1}$ (Ng et al., Reference Ng, Bucciantini and Gaensler2012). The Mouse PWN is the next in size and has radio and X-ray tails spanning 17 and 1 pc, respectively (Gaensler et al., Reference Gaensler, van der Swaluw and Camilo2004), and a pulsar velocity of 300 km s $^{-1}$ (Hales et al., Reference Hales, Gaensler, Chatterjee, van der Swaluw and Camilo2009). The G319.9 $-$ 0.7 PWN has the longest X-ray tail of 7 pc, which is also relatively big compared to its 10 pc radio tail (Ng et al., Reference Ng, Gaensler, Chatterjee and Johnston2010). The velocity of the central pulsar J1509 $-$ 5850 is $\sim$ 300 km s $^{-1}$ . As noted earlier, the appearance of PWN is strongly influenced by the physical properties of their surrounding environment, such as density and magnetic field. Hence, a weak correlation between the pulsar velocity and the radio length is not unexpected.

4.3 Radio and X-Ray spectral analysis

The spectral map of Potoroo shows a flat radio continuum spectrum near the pulsar due to younger and more energetic electrons, while the spectrum becomes steeper as the distance from the pulsar increases, where synchrotron radiation originates from the older electron population. To examine the spectral variations of Potoroo, we obtained spectral indices from three different regions: the main body, the diffuse part of the tail, and the entire source area (see Figure 4 and Table 4).

Table 4. Spectral ${\unicode{x03B1}}$ and photon $\Gamma$ indices of Potoroo. The spectral indices are calculated from the spectral map generated using data at 944, 1 284 and 1 368 MHz, as described in Section 3.2. The photon index is derived by fitting combined Chandra and XMM-Newton data within the energy range of $2-10$ keV.

While the main body of Potoroo exhibits a typical flat spectral index of $-$ 0.21, its overall spectral index is much steeper than that of any other observed PWN. The dominance of its diffuse tail is evident, but its remarkable length coupled with the unusually steep spectrum raises intriguing questions. Taken together, these observed properties provide additional support for classifying Potoroo as a mature PWN.

When a PWN interacts with the reverse shock of its parent SNR, the relativistic particles within the nebula undergo re-acceleration. This process significantly enhances the brightness of the nebula, particularly at radio frequencies. Simultaneously, the magnetic field of the PWN gets compressed by the shock. As synchrotron radiation is emitted when charged particles spiral in a magnetic field, the frequency of this radiation depends on both the energy of particles and the strength of the magnetic field. A stronger magnetic field results in higher frequency radiation leading to a rapid synchrotron burn-off and steepening of the spectral index. The steepest spectral indices known are associated with PWNe that have collided with the reverse shock. However, even in these cases, the spectral indices do not exceed $-$ 0.7, α = –0.69 (G141.2+5+0, Kothes et al., Reference Kothes, Sun, Reich and Foster2014) and α = –0.62 (G76.9+1.0, Landecker et al., Reference Landecker, Higgs and Wendker1993).

In the Chandra observations, Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) found a similar trend of the spectrum softening with increasing distance from the Potoroo pulsar (see their Figure 2). The authors divided the X-ray source emission into three narrow bands with equal counts. By comparing the softest image with the hardest, they observed that the emission tends to clump towards the point-like source for higher energies, thereby enhancing the prominence of the point-like source and reducing the tail emission.

At X-ray energies and beyond, synchrotron emission is commonly modelled as a power-law distribution of photons: N $_{E}\propto E^{-\Gamma}$ , where N $_{E}$ is the number of photons with energies E and $\Gamma=1-{\unicode{x03B1}}$ is the photon index. In the context of PWN, the typical value for $\Gamma$ is around 2 (Gaensler & Slane, Reference Gaensler and Slane2006), and the index tends to increase (softens, steepens) with greater distances from the pulsar.

The photon index of Potoroo of 1.1 is taken from the work of Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014), and also listed in Table 4. The authors used data from XMM-Newton to supplement the limited photon statistics of the Chandra data and refine constraints on the spectral parameters. Due to the limited angular resolution of XMM-Newton, the point source and extended emission of Potoroo could not be resolved, so only the full source spectrum was fitted. The calculated photon index of 1.1 is much harder than typical X-ray PWN spectra. This hardness is expected, given that the source is detectable only above 2 keV and lacks any softening towards lower energies.

The collision between PWN and the reverse shock leads to the efficient blending of thermal and non-thermal gases (Blondin et al., Reference Blondin, Chevalier and Frierson2001), which is expected to produce thermal soft X-ray emissions. Jakobsen et al. (Reference Jakobsen, Tomsick, Watson, Gotthelf and Kaspi2014) attempt to fit the Potoroo spectra with a thermal model resulted in encountering unconstrained parameters and unacceptable fit statistics.

The complete understanding of the Potoroo’s spectrum remains open. Further investigations using higher frequency radio bands, deeper X-ray data, and potential ${\unicode{x03B3}}$ detections are necessary to determine its unique characteristics. However, due to the high absorption in the line of sight towards the Norma spiral arm, it is unlikely that searching for thermal X-ray emission or a bow-shock in H ${\unicode{x03B1}}$ will yield any significant results.

4.4 Properties of PSR J1638–4713

It is well known that NSs move at higher velocities than their progenitor stars (Gunn & Ostriker, Reference Gunn and Ostriker1970). In fact, a significant number of isolated NS have velocities exceeding 1 000 km s $^{-1}$ (e.g. Hobbs et al., Reference Hobbs, Lorimer, Lyne and Kramer2005; Deller et al., Reference Deller, Goss and Brisken2019). These high velocities are believed to result from natal kicks that occur during the NSs’ formation. The natal kicks could be caused by various mechanisms, including asymmetric explosions triggered by hydrodynamical perturbations in the SN core (e.g. Lai & Goldreich, Reference Lai and Goldreich2000), or asymmetric neutrino emission in the presence of super-strong magnetic fields ( $B>10^{15}$ G) in the proto-neutron star (e.g. Arras & Lai, 1999a,b, and references therein). Therefore, the discovery of fast-moving pulsars might shed light on the physics of SN. As discussed in Section 4.1, the transverse velocity of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 is likely to be higher than 1 000 km s $^{-1}$ , which makes it among the fastest moving NSs. The relatively strong radio continuum emission from the PWN also opens up the opportunity to place constraints on the proper motion and parallax of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 (Deller et al., Reference Deller, Goss and Brisken2019). These measurements will be crucial for us to understand the origin and properties of Potoroo.

The spin parameters of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 are consistent with those of young, energetic pulsars. In Figure 8, we show the spin period (P) and the time derivative of the spin period ( $\dot{P}$ ) for all known pulsars listed in the ATNF Pulsar Catalogue (Manchester et al., Reference Manchester, Hobbs, Teoh and Hobbs2005). PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 is shown as a red triangle, and it is located in a region where young pulsars with high energy emissions are. Based on our current estimate of the $\dot{P}$ , the spin-down luminosity of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 is estimated to be ${\sim}6.1\times10^{36}$ erg s $^{-1}$ , revealing an energy loss rate that is among the highest for supersonic pulsars associated with PWN (Table 1, Kargaltsev et al., Reference Kargaltsev, Pavlov, Klingler and Rangelov2017). We are currently regularly observing PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 with the Parkes telescope, and a longer pulsar timing baseline will enable us to precisely measure the spin and astrometric parameters of this pulsar. Better timing models of this pulsar will also enable us to search for high-energy pulsation (e.g. X-ray and ${\unicode{x03B3}}$ -ray) in the future.

Figure 8. The spin period (P) versus the time derivative of the spin period ( $\dot{P}$ ) for known pulsars (the so-called ‘P-Pdot’ diagram). Different types of pulsars are shown with different markers and PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 (CXOU J163802.6 $-$ 471358) is shown as a red triangle. We plot contours of characteristic ages, magnetic fields and spin-down luminosity based on the canonical pulsar spin-down model (Lorimer & Kramer, Reference Lorimer and Kramer2004).

5. Conclusion

We report the discovery of a bow-shock PWN, named Potoroo, in the new radio continuum surveys obtained by ASKAP and MeerKAT, and the detection of the associated PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 using Parkes observations. We also compared our results with the previous study of the X-ray source detected during the Norma spiral arm Chandra survey. The object exhibits distinctive cometary morphology in both radio and X-ray domains, suggesting pulsar leading the PWN and travelling supersonically through the ambient medium. We estimated a large projected velocity of PSR J1638 $-$ 4713, well exceeding 1 000 km s $^{-1}$ . The pulsar was identified above 3 GHz at a very high DM of 1 553 pc cm $^{-3}$ . Potoroo’s radio size is longer than its X-ray size by a factor of 10. With a distance of at least 10 kpc, the physical sizes are approximately 21 pc and 2 pc for radio and X-ray sources, respectively. This makes Potoroo one of the longest observed radio PWN trail to date.

Our analysis of Potoroo has revealed an unusually steep overall radio spectrum ( ${\unicode{x03B1}}=-1.27$ ), which falls far below the typical values for PWNe. However, focusing only on the high signal-to-noise ratio part of the nebula, we found that its ${\unicode{x03B1}}$ value is consistent with the majority of PWNe. We attribute the steep overall spectral index to the interaction of the parent SN reverse shock with the PWN, which results in an increase of the magnetic field of the PWN and severe synchrotron burn-off of the highest energy electrons. This interaction also makes the radio nebula brighter, and along with massive absorption of the surrounding medium, explains the significant length difference observed between the radio and X-ray sources.

Multi-frequency studies of Potoroo are essential to further understand the physics of this remarkable object and its evolution in a very complex environment. In particular, our polarisation analysis revealed highly ordered polarisation vectors that run parallel to the Potoroo’s tail orientation, but additional high-frequency polarimetry is required to constrain the magnetic field. Dedicated Chandra longer exposure observations are necessary in order to investigate the nature of the misaligned outflow and improve our image of the flow structure of the X-ray particles. The parent SNR is not known so far, and to deeper investigate the origin of Potoroo, we intend to study the distribution of the ISM in the surrounding environment through molecular lines. Based on the PSR J1638 $-$ 4713 spin-down and characteristic age, we anticipate detecting gamma-ray photons from Potoroo. If TeV emission is detected, we can accurately measure the magnetic field’s strength by jointly modelling the synchrotron and inverse Compton scattering emission.

Acknowledgement

This scientific work uses data obtained from Inyarrimanha Ilgari Bundara, the CSIRO Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory. We acknowledge the Wajarri Yamaji People as the Traditional Owners and native title holders of the Observatory site. CSIRO’s ASKAP radio telescope is part of the Australia Telescope National Facility (ATNF)Footnote e. Operation of ASKAP is funded by the Australian Government with support from the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. ASKAP uses the resources of the Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre. Establishment of ASKAP, Inyarrimanha Ilgari Bundara, the CSIRO Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory and the Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre are initiatives of the Australian Government, with support from the Government of Western Australia and the Science and Industry Endowment Fund. The Parkes radio telescope (recently given the Indigenous Wiradjuri name Murriyang) is also part of ATNF which is funded by the Australian Government for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. We acknowledge the Wiradjuri people as the Traditional Owners of this observatory site.

The MeerKAT telescope is operated by the South African Radio Astronomy Observatory, which is a facility of the National Research Foundation, an agency of the South Africa Department of Science and Innovation.

The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the US National Science Foundation, operated under a cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.

This publication also makes use of data products from the CDA and software provided by the Chandra X-ray Center (CXC), as well as from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, that is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The authors acknowledge the use of the NASA’s Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic ServicesFootnote f and Simbad Astronomical DatabaseFootnote g, operated at the CDS, Strasbourg, France. CARTAFootnote h and SAOImage DS9Footnote i (Joye & Mandel, Reference Joye, Mandel, Payne, Jedrzejewski and Hook2003) tools are extensively used for image display and visualisation.

We thank Fernando Camilo for the early stage paper discussion and for providing the MeerKAT data. We also thank Naomi van Jaarsveld, Benjamin Stappers, and Vanessa McBridge for conducting the initial Parkes observation of Potoroo and generously sharing their notes on data reduction.

S.L., M.D.F., and G.R. acknowledge the Australian Research Council (ARC) funding through grant DP200100784. S.L. also acknowledges support fromthe Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia through contract number 451-03-47/2023-01/200002. S.D. is the recipient of an ARC Discovery Early Career Award (DE210101738) funded by the Australian Government.

We thank an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions that greatly improved our paper.

Data availability

This study made use of archival ASKAP data obtained fromthe CSIROASKAP Science Data Archive (CASDA)Footnote j. The observations from the Parkes radio telescope are accessible through the same portal but after an 18-month embargo period. The corresponding author can provide the MeerKAT data upon reasonable request. The X-ray imagining results are based on data from the CDAFootnote k. WISE maps were obtained via the SkyView Virtual ObservatoryFootnote l server, which is supported by NASA’s High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC). This study also drew information from the WISE Catalog of Galactic HII RegionsFootnote m and the ATNF Pulsar CatalogueFootnote n.

References

Alsaberi, R. Z. E., Maitra, C., Filipović, M. D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 250710.1093/mnras/stz971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, L. D., Bania, T. M., Balser, D. S., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 1Google Scholar
Arras, P., & Lai, D. 1999 a, ApJ, 519, 745Google Scholar
Arras, P., & Lai, D. 1999b, Phys. Rev. D, 60, 043001Google Scholar
Baganoff, F. K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, 891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. T., Dai, S., Zhi, Q. J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 179410.1093/mnras/stac918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, B. D., Kothes, R., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 139610.1093/mnras/stad1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondin, J. M., Chevalier, R. A., & Frierson, D. M. 2001, ApJ, 563, 806Google Scholar
Brunthaler, A., Menten, K. M., Dzib, S. A., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A8510.1051/0004-6361/202039856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucciantini, N. 2002, A&A, 387, 106610.1051/0004-6361:20020495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucciantini, N., & Bandiera, R. 2001, A&A, 375, 1032Google Scholar
Bucciantini, N., Blondin, J. M., Del Zanna, L., & Amato, E. 2003, A&A, 405, 617Google Scholar
Camilo, F., Ng, C. Y., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 703, L55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, G. L., & Bhattacharya, D. 1998, ApJ, 504, 761Google Scholar
Comrie, A., Wang, K.-S., Hsu, S.-C., et al. 2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy, ZenodoGoogle Scholar
Dai, S., Hobbs, G., Manchester, R. N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3223Google Scholar
Dai, S., Lower, M. E., Bailes, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, L1410.3847/2041-8213/ab0e7aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D., & Thaddeus, P. 2001, ApJ, 547, 792Google Scholar
de Vries, M., Romani, R. W., Kargaltsev, O., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 7010.3847/1538-4357/ac9794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deller, A. T., Goss, W. M., Brisken, W. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, 100Google Scholar
Eatough, R. P., Falcke, H., Karuppusamy, R., et al. 2013, Nature, 501, 391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, M. D. , & Tothill, N. F. H., eds. 2021, Multimessenger Astronomy in Practice, 2514-3433 (IOP Publishing), doi: 10.1088/2514-3433/ac2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, M. D., Payne, J. L., Alsaberi, R. Z. E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 265Google Scholar
Fornasini, F. M., Tomsick, J. A., Bodaghee, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 10510.1088/0004-637X/796/2/105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. Silva, D. R. & Doxsey, R. E., 62701VGoogle Scholar
Gaensler, B. M., & Slane, P. O. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 17Google Scholar
Gaensler, B. M., van der Swaluw, E., Camilo, F., et al. 2004, ApJ, 616, 383Google Scholar
Goedhart, S., Cotton, W. D., Camilo, F., et al. 2023, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231207275G/abstractGoogle Scholar
Gould, D. M., & Lyne, A. G. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 235Google Scholar
Green, D. A. 2019, J. Astrophy. Astronom., 40, 36Google Scholar
Green, D. A. 2022, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom (available at ‘http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/’)Google Scholar
Gunn, J. E., & Ostriker, J. P. 1970, ApJ, 160, 979Google Scholar
Gürkan, G., Prandoni, I., O’Brien, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 6104Google Scholar
Guzman, J., Whiting, M., Voronkov, M., et al. 2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software, ascl:1912.003Google Scholar
Collaboration, H. E. S. S., Abdalla, H., Abramowski, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A2Google Scholar
Hales, C. A., Gaensler, B. M., Chatterjee, S., van der Swaluw, E., & Camilo, F. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1316Google Scholar
Hobbs, G., Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G., & Kramer, M. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 97410.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09087.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G., Manchester, R. N., Dunning, A., et al. 2020, PASA, 37, e012Google Scholar
Hobbs, G. B., Edwards, R. T., & Manchester, R. N. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 655Google Scholar
Hotan, A., Whiting, M., Huynh, M., & Moss, V. 2020, ASKAP Data Products for Project AS113 (Other ASKAP pilot science including tests, TOOs or guest observations): images and visibilities, cSIRO. Data Collection.Google Scholar
Hotan, A. W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R. N. 2004, PASA, 21, 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotan, A. W., Bunton, J. D., Chippendale, A. P., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e009Google Scholar
Hui, C. Y., & Becker, W. 2007, A&A, 467, 1209Google Scholar
Jakobsen, S. J., Tomsick, J. A., Watson, D., Gotthelf, E. V., & Kaspi, V. M. 2014, ApJ, 787, 12910.1088/0004-637X/787/2/129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1Google Scholar
Jin, R., Ng, C. Y., Roberts, M. S. E., & Li, K.-L. 2023, ApJ, 942, 100Google Scholar
Johnston, S., Taylor, R., Bailes, M., et al. 2008, Exp. Astronom., 22, 151Google Scholar
Jonas, J., & MeerKAT Team. 2016, in MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, 1Google Scholar
Jonas, J. L. 2009, IEEE Proc., 97, 1522Google Scholar
Joye, W. A., & Mandel, E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. Payne, H. E., Jedrzejewski, R. I., & Hook, R. N., 489Google Scholar
Kargaltsev, O., & Pavlov, G. G. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 983, 40 Years of Pulsars: Millisecond Pulsars, Magnetars and More, ed. Bassa, C., Wang, Z., Cumming, A., & Kaspi, V. M., 171–185Google Scholar
Kargaltsev, O., Pavlov, G. G., Klingler, N., & Rangelov, B. 2017, J. Plasma Phys., 83, 635830501Google Scholar
Kennel, C. F., & Coroniti, F. V. 1984, ApJ, 283, 710Google Scholar
Klingler, N., Hare, J., Kargaltsev, O., Pavlov, G. G., & Tomsick, J. 2023, ApJ, 950, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingler, N., Kargaltsev, O., Pavlov, G. G., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 5Google Scholar
Kothes, R. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 446, Modelling Pulsar Wind Nebulae, ed. Torres, D. F., 1Google Scholar
Kothes, R., & Dougherty, S. M. 2007, A&A, 468, 993Google Scholar
Kothes, R., Reich, W., Safi-Harb, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothes, R., Reich, W., & Uyanker, B. 2006, ApJ, 638, 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothes, R., Sun, X. H., Reich, W., & Foster, T. J. 2014, ApJ, 784, L26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, D. 2004, in Cosmic explosions in three dimensions, ed. Höflich, P., Kumar, P., & Wheeler, J. C., 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, D., & Goldreich, P. 2000, ApJ, 535, 402Google Scholar
Landecker, T. L., Higgs, L. A., & Wendker, H. J. 1993, A&A, 276, 522Google Scholar
Lemiere, A., Slane, P., Gaensler, B. M., & Murray, S. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenc, E., Murphy, T., Lynch, C. R., Kaplan, D. L., & Zhang, S. N. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, D. R., & Kramer, M. 2004, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy, Vol. 4 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993Google Scholar
Mauch, T., Cotton, W. D., Condon, J. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 61Google Scholar
McConnell, D., Allison, J. R., Bannister, K., et al. 2016, PASA, 33, e042Google Scholar
Murphy, T., Mauch, T., Green, A., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, C. Y., Bucciantini, N., Gaensler, B. M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, C. Y., Gaensler, B. M., Chatterjee, S., & Johnston, S. 2010, ApJ, 712, 596Google Scholar
Norris, R., Filipovic, M., Huynh, M., et al. 2019, ASKAP Data Products for Project AS101 (ASKAP Pilot Survey for EMU): images and visibilities, cSIRO. Data Collection.Google Scholar
Norris, R. P., Marvil, J., Collier, J. D., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e04610.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavan, L., Bordas, P., Pühlhofer, G., et al. 2014a, A&A, 562, A122Google Scholar
Pavan, L., Bordas, P., Pühlhofer, G., et al. 2014b, in International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, Vol. 28, International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, 1460172Google Scholar
Pavlovic, M. Z., Dobardzic, A., Vukotic, B., & Urosevic, D. 2014, Serb. Astronom. J., 189, 25Google Scholar
Porth, O., Buehler, R., Olmi, B., et al. 2017, Space Sci. Rev., 207, 137Google Scholar
Ransom, S. M. 2001, PhD thesis, Harvard University, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. P. 2009, ApJ, 703, 662Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. P., Pavlov, G. G., Kargaltsev, O., et al. 2017, Space Sci. Rev., 207, 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. Shaw, R. A., Payne, H. E., & Hayes, J. J. E., 433Google Scholar
Schinckel, A. E., Bunton, J. D., Cornwell, T. J., Feain, I., & Hay, S. G. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8444, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV, ed. Stepp, L. M., Gilmozzi, R., & Hall, H. J., 84442AGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P. A., & Goss, W. M. 1970, Aust. J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl., 14, 133Google Scholar
Storm, R. G., & Greidanus, H. 1992, Nature, 368, 6564Google Scholar
Stupar, M., Filipović, M. D., Parker, Q. A., et al. 2007, Ap&SS, 307, 423Google Scholar
Truelove, J. K., & McKee, C. F. 1999, ApJS, 120, 299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Swaluw, E. 2003, A&A, 404, 939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Swaluw, E. 2004, Adv. Space Res., 33, 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Swaluw, E., Achterberg, A., Gallant, Y. A., & Tóth, G. 2001, A&A, 380, 309Google Scholar
van der Swaluw, E., Downes, T. P., & Keegan, R. 2004, A&A, 420, 937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Jaarsveld, N., Camilo, F., Stappers, Benjamin, & McBride, V. 2019, Parkes observations for project P1019 semester 2019APRS_01, cSIRO. Data Collection.Google Scholar
van Straten, W., & Bailes, M. 2011, PASA, 28, 1Google Scholar
Weiler, K. W., & Sramek, R. A. 1988, ARA&A, 26, 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisskopf, M. C., Tananbaum, H. D., Van Speybroeck, L. P., & O’Dell, S. L. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4012, X-Ray Optics, Instruments, and Missions III, ed. Truemper, J. E. & Aschenbach, B., 2–16Google Scholar
Whiteoak, J. B. Z., & Green, A. J. 1996, A&As, 118, 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868Google Scholar
Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, D., & Heinz, S. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusef-Zadeh, F., & Gaensler, B. M. 2005, Adv. Space Res., 35, 1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Composite image of the Galactic plane region and Potoroo, with the red layer showing the ASKAP total intensity image at 1 368 MHz, and the green and blue layers representing WISE infrared images at 12 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$m and 22 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$m, respectively. Known Galactic SNRs are indicated by red circles (Green, 2019, 2022), while known Galactic HII regions are marked by green circles (Anderson et al., 2014). The box highlights the section of deep interest. The inset is the ASKAP zoomed-in image showing Potoroo where a red cross marks the position of the X-ray source, while a red dashed line is Potoroo’s axis of symmetry, which corresponds to the tail length studied in this paper.

Figure 1

Table 1. Observational details of the Potoroo data used in this work.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Radio and X-ray images of Potoroo. The left panel presents the ASKAP total intensity image at 1 368 MHz, with the beam size of 8.8$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$7.4$^{\prime\prime}$ shown in the bottom left corner. In the middle panel, the Chandra image within the energy range of $2-8$ keV is smoothed with a two-dimensional Gaussian where ${\unicode{x03C3}}$ = 2.5$^{\prime\prime}$. The green contours correspond to ASKAP’s 1 368 MHz Stokes $\rm I$ image at the following levels: 0.2, 0.3, 0.8, 3, 5 mJy beam$^{-1}$. The red box highlights the area of the zoomed-in Chandra image in the right panels, where the bottom right image has the same ASKAP contours as the middle image and the top right image is overlaid with red contours from ASKAP 944 MHz image of circular polarisation. The significances of the red contours are 3, 4 and 5${\unicode{x03C3}}$, where 1${\unicode{x03C3}}$=24 ${\unicode{x03BC}}$Jy beam$^{-1}$. The white “x” marks the X-ray peak, while the yellow “x” marks the radio peak. The red dashed lines denote the axis of symmetry of Potoroo.

Figure 3

Table 2. Peak flux densities $S_{\rm peak}$ and integrated flux densities $S_{{\unicode{x03BD}}}$ of Potoroo at three frequencies. The average polarised intensity PI and fractional polarisation FP, as well as the peak of fractional polarisation $FP_{\rm peak}$ are quantified only for 1 368 MHz ASKAP data.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Profiles of Potoroo along the axis of symmetry as a function of the distance from the Stokes $\rm V$ peak. The Stokes $\rm I$ profile at 1 368 MHz is represented with a black solid line, while the Stokes $\rm V$ profile at 944 MHz is represented with the red dotted line. Both profiles are given in [mJy beam$^{-1}$] units and correspond to the left y-axes, respectively. The X-ray intensity profile in the 2 – 8 keV energy range is shown by the black dashed line and corresponds to the right y-axis. The grey box indicates the region of the zoomed-in plot showing the peaks of the Stokes $\rm V$, X-ray and Stokes $\rm I$ profiles, listed in order of appearance. The orange and red shaded boxes represent the pixel increment of the ASKAP and Chandra data. The horisontal dashed blue line denotes the noise level, and the red “x” marks the end of the tail studied in this paper.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Spectral index map created using the ASKAP total intensity images at 944 and 1 368 MHz, and the MeerKAT image at 1 284 MHz. The map is overlaid with the same radio contours as presented in Figure 2, middle panel. In the bottom left corner, the synthesised beam size, 16.3$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$13.3$^{\prime\prime}$, is given by a grey ellipse. The boxes indicate specific regions for which spectral indices are calculated: the main body (red box), the diffuse region (blue box) and the entire object (black dotted box).

Figure 6

Figure 5. Polarisation intensity (left) and fractional polarisation (middle) maps of Potoroo at 1 368 MHz are shown. The orange ellipses in the bottom left corner represent the synthesised beam with the size of 10$^{\prime\prime}$$\times$10$^{\prime\prime}$. Polarisation vectors in the observed electric field direction overlay the grey-scale Stokes $\rm I$ image (right). The plotted vectors are of equal length and approximately half the beam size apart. All images have the same superimposed contours as used in the middle panel of Figure 2.

Figure 7

Figure 6. The pulse profile (top panel) and frequency spectrum (bottom panel) of PSR J1638$-$4713, the 65.74 ms pulsar discovered in the Potoroo PWN with the Parkes UWL at 3 GHz. The pulse profile has been corrected for the measured DM of 1 553 pc cm$^{-3}$. Greyed out horizontal bands, such as at a frequency of 3 456 MHz, represent data flagged to remove RFI.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Pulsar spin period as a function of time. The dot-dashed line shows a linear fit, which gives a measure of the spin-down, $\dot{P}=4.4\times$10$^{14}$s/s.

Figure 9

Table 3. Natal kick velocities V of the Potoroo pulsar derived as a function of SNR age and travel lengths correspond to one, two, and three times the tail sizes. The adopted distance to Potoroo is 10 kpc. The analysis also includes the case of SNR G338.1+0.4 at a distance of 6.2 kpc. Reasonable values are highlighted in bold.

Figure 10

Table 4. Spectral ${\unicode{x03B1}}$ and photon $\Gamma$ indices of Potoroo. The spectral indices are calculated from the spectral map generated using data at 944, 1 284 and 1 368 MHz, as described in Section 3.2. The photon index is derived by fitting combined Chandra and XMM-Newton data within the energy range of $2-10$ keV.

Figure 11

Figure 8. The spin period (P) versus the time derivative of the spin period ($\dot{P}$) for known pulsars (the so-called ‘P-Pdot’ diagram). Different types of pulsars are shown with different markers and PSR J1638$-$4713 (CXOU J163802.6$-$471358) is shown as a red triangle. We plot contours of characteristic ages, magnetic fields and spin-down luminosity based on the canonical pulsar spin-down model (Lorimer & Kramer, 2004).