Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T14:31:22.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Role Models on Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Jessica Kennedy ,
Judy Drennan ,
Patty Renfrow  and
Bernadette Watson
Get access

Abstract

The Smart State initiative requires both improved education and training, particularly in technical fields, plus entrepreneurship to commercialise new ideas. In this study, we propose an entrepreneurial intentions model as a guide to examine the educational choices and entrepreneurial intentions of first-year University students, focusing on the effect of role models. A survey of over 1000 first-year University students revealed that the most enterprising students were choosing to study in the disciplines of information technology and business, economics and law, or selecting dual degree programs that include business. The role models most often identified for their choice of field of study were parents, followed by teachers and peers, with females identifying more role models than males. For entrepreneurship, students' role models were parents and peers, followed by famous persons and teachers. Males and females identified similar numbers of role models, but males found starting a business more desirable and more feasible, and reported higher entrepreneurial intention. The implications of these findings for Smart State policy are discussed.

Type
Special Theme: Queensland: The Smart State
Information
Queensland Review , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 2003 , pp. 37 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Assoc. 1982, The Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms, Washington DC, APA.Google Scholar
Australian Government. 2001, Backing Australia's Ability: An Innovation Action Plan for the Future, Canberra, AGPS.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., 1977, Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Basow, S. A., and Howe, K. G., 1979, ‘Model influence on career choices of college students,’ Vocational-Guidance-Quarterly, 27.3, 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basow, S. A., and Howe, K. G., 1980, ‘Role-model influence: Effects of sex and sex-role attitude in college students’, Psychology of Women Quarterly 4, 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begley, T. M., Rab, A., Zamora, E., and Nanayakkara, G., 1997, ‘The relationship between sociocultural dimensions and interest in starting a business: A multi-country study’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley MA: Babson College, 156–167.Google Scholar
Betz, N. E., and Hackett, G., 1981, ‘The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college men and women’, Journal of Counseling Psychology 28. 5, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, B., 1988, ‘Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention’, Academy of Management Review, 13.3, 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, N. G., and Vozikis, G. S. (1994), ‘The influence of self efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice Summer, 63–77.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P., 1995, Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions, RENT IX Workshop, Piacenza, Italy.Google Scholar
Dryler, H., 1998, ‘Parental role models, gender and choice,’ British Journal of Sociology 49, 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. A., and Whigham, M., 1995, ‘The effect of a role model project upon the attitudes of ninth-grade science students,’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, T. A., and Stafford, M. E. 1999, ‘Reliability and validity of the career influence inventory: A pilot study’, Journal of Career Assessment, 7.2, 187–202.Google Scholar
Hackett, G, and Betz, N. 1981, ‘A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women,’ Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326–339.Google Scholar
Hackett, G., Esposito, D., and S., O'Halloran, M, 1989, ‘The relationship of role model influences to the career salience and educational career plans of college women,’ Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35.2, 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindle, K., and Rushworth, S., 2000, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Australia 2000, Hawthorne, Victoria, Swinburne University of Technology.Google Scholar
Innovation Summit Implemetation Group. 2000, Innovation: Unlocking the Future, Goanna Print.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J., and Drennan, J., 2002, ‘Effects of enterprise education on perceptions of entrepreneurship: A study of Queensland secondary school students,’ 15th SEAANZ Conference, Adelaide, 22-24 September. Google Scholar
M, Kourilsky, and Walstad, W. B. 1998, ‘Entrepreneurship and female youth: Knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices,’ Journal of Business Venturing 13, 77–88.Google Scholar
Krueger, N., 1993, ‘The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18.31, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, N., and Dickson, P. R. 1994, ‘How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self efficacy and opportunity recognition,’ Decision Sciences, 25.3, 385–400.Google Scholar
Krueger, N.,Reilly, M. D. and Carsrud, A. L. 2000, ‘Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions’, Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.Google Scholar
Krueger, N. F., and Dickson, P. R. 1993, ‘Perceived self efficacy and perceptions of opportunity and threat,’ Psychological Reports, 72, 1235–1240.Google Scholar
Lent, R. W.,Brown, S. D. and Hackett, G. 1994, ‘Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance,’ Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.Google Scholar
Matthews, C. H., and Moser, S., 1996, ‘A longitudinal investigation of the impact of family background and gender on interest in small firm ownership,’ Journal of Small Business Management, 34.2, 29.Google Scholar
Minchen, N., and Anderson, C., 2000, Final Summit Communique, Melbourne, National Innovation Summit.Google Scholar
Minniti, M., and Bygrave, W., 1999, ‘The microfoundations of entrepreneurship,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23. 4, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauta, M. M., and Kokaly, M. L. 2001, ‘Assessing role model influences on students’ academic and vocational decisions,’ Journal of Career Assessment, 9. 1, 81–99.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1998, Fostering Entrepreneurship - Policy Brief ♯9, Paris.Google Scholar
Pleiss, M. K., and Feldhusen, J. F. 1995, ‘Mentors, role models, and heroes in the lives of gifted children,’ Educational Psychologist, 30, 159–169.Google Scholar
Queensland Government 2002, ‘The Future is Here,’ www.thepremier.qld.gov.au/pdf/the_future_is_here.pdf December 16, 2002.Google Scholar
Queensland Department of State Development 1999, Innovation - Queensland's Future, Brisbane, Department of State Development.Google Scholar
Scherer, R. F., Adams, J. S., Carley, S. S., and Wiebe, F. A., 1989, ‘Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Spring, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapero, A., 1975, ‘The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur,’ Psychology Today, 9, Nov., 83–88.Google Scholar
Shapero, A., and Sokol, L., 1982, The social dimensions of entrepreneurship, Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, eds. Kent, C. A., Sexton, D. L. and Vesper, K. H., Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice Hall, 72–90.Google Scholar
Starr, J. A., and Fondas, N., 1992, ‘A model of entrepreneurial socialization and organization formation,’ Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17.1, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar