Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-4ks9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-14T03:28:11.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NEW RAMPED OXIDATION-14C ANALYSIS FACILITY AT THE NEIF RADIOCARBON LABORATORY, EAST KILBRIDE, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023

M H Garnett Open the ORCID record for M H Garnett [Opens in a new window] ,
R Pereira ,
C Taylor ,
C Murray  and
P L Ascough Open the ORCID record for P L Ascough [Opens in a new window]
M H Garnett*
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, NEIF Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride, UK
R Pereira
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, The Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, UK
C Taylor
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, NEIF Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride, UK
C Murray
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, NEIF Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride, UK
P L Ascough
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, NEIF Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Mark.Garnett@glasgow.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sample materials such as sediments and soils contain complex mixtures of different carbon-containing compounds. These bulk samples can be split into individual fractions, based on the temperature of thermal decomposition of their components. When coupled with radiocarbon (14C) measurement of the isolated fractions, this approach offers the advantage of directly investigating the residence time, turnover time, source, or age of the different components within a mixed sample, providing important insights to better understand the cycling of carbon in the environment. Several laboratories have previously reported different approaches to separate radiocarbon samples based on temperature in what is a growing area of interest within the research community. Here, we report the design and operation of a new ramped oxidation facility for separation of sample carbon on the basis of thermal resistance at the NEIF Radiocarbon Laboratory in East Kilbride, UK. Our new instrumentation shares some characteristics with the previously-reported systems applying ramped oxidation and/or ramped pyrolysis for radiocarbon measurement, but also has several differences which we describe and discuss. We also present the results of a thorough program of testing of the new system, which demonstrates both the reproducibility of the thermograms generated during sample combustion, and the reliability of the radiocarbon measurements obtained on individual sample fractions. This is achieved through quantification of the radiocarbon background and analysis of multiple standards of known 14C content during standard operation of the instrumentation.

Keywords

combustionradiocarbonramped oxidationthermogram
Type
Technical Note
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 65 , Issue 5 , October 2023 , pp. 1213 - 1229
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Blattmann, TM, Montluçon, DB, Haghipour, N, Ishikawa, NF, Eglinton, TI. 2020. Liquid chromatographic isolation of individual amino acids extracted from sediments for radiocarbon analysis. Frontiers in Marine Science 7. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutton, TW, Wong, WW, Hachley, DL, Lee, LS, Cabrera, MP, Klein, PD. 1983. Comparison of quartz and pyrex tubes for combustion of organic samples for stable isotopes. Analytical Chemistry 55: 1832–1833.Google Scholar
Bryant, CL, Henley, SF, Murray, C, Ganeshram, RS, Shanks, R. 2013. Storage and hydrolysis of seawater samples for inorganic carbon isotope analysis. Radiocarbon 55:401–409.Google Scholar
Casanova, E, Knowles, TDJ, Bayliss, A, Dunne, J, Barański, MZ, Denaire, A, Lefranc, P, di Lernia, S, Roffet-Salque, M, Smyth, J, et al. 2020. Accurate compound-specific 14C dating of archaeological pottery vessels. Nature 580(7804):506–510.Google Scholar
Castrillejo, M, Hansman, RL, Graven, HD, Lester, JG, Bollhalder, S, Kündig, K, Wacker, L. 2023. Comparability of radiocarbon measurements in dissolved inorganic carbon of seawater produced at ETH-Zurich. Radiocarbon: 1–10. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2023.16Google Scholar
Donahue, DJ, Linick, TW, Jull, AJT. 1990. Isotope-ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32:135–142.Google Scholar
Fernandez, A, Santos, GM, Williams, EK, Pendergraft, MA, Vetter, L, Rosenheim, BE. 2014. Blank corrections for ramped pyrolysis radiocarbon dating of sedimentary and soil organic carbon. Analytical Chemistry 86(24):12085–12092.Google Scholar
Garnett, MH, Hardie, SML, Murray, C. 2012. Radiocarbon analysis of methane emitted from the surface of a raised peat bog. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 50:158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, MH, Newton, J-A, Ascough, PL. 2019. Advances in the radiocarbon analysis of carbon dioxide at the NERC Radiocarbon Facility (East Kilbride) using molecular sieve cartridges. Radiocarbon 61:1855–1865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, S, Scott, M. 1995. Report of the TIRI workshop, Saturday 13 August 1994. Radiocarbon 37: 820–821.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I, Ascough, P, Garnett, MH, Fallon, SJ, Pearson, CL, Quarta, G, Spalding, KL, Yamaguchi, H, Yoneda, M. 2021. Radiocarbon dating. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 1:62.Google Scholar
Hanke, UM, Gagnon, AR, Reddy, CM, Lardie Gaylord, MC, Cruz, AJ, Galy, V, Hansman, RL, Kurz, MD. 2023. Sequential thermal analysis of complex organic mixtures: procedural standards and improved CO2 purification capacity. Radiocarbon 65:389–409.Google Scholar
Hemingway, JD, Galy, VV, Gagnon, AR, Grant, KE, Rosengard, SZ, Soulet, G, Zigah, PK, McNichol, AP. 2017. Assessing the blank carbon contribution, isotope mass balance, and kinetic isotope fractionation of the ramped pyrolysis/oxidation instrument at NOSAMS. Radiocarbon 59:179–193.Google Scholar
Hemingway, JD, Rothman, DH, Grant, KE, Rosengard, SZ, Eglinton, TI, Derry, LA, Galy, VV. 2019. Mineral protection regulates long-term global preservation of natural organic carbon. Nature 570:228–231.Google Scholar
Keaveney, EM, Barrett, GT, Allen, K, Reimer, PJ. 2021. A new ramped pyroxidation/combustion facility at 14Chrono, Belfast: setup description and initial results. Radiocarbon 63:1273–1286.Google Scholar
Manning, DAC, Lopez-Capel, E, White, ML, Barker, S. 2008. Carbon isotope determination for separate components of heterogeneous materials using coupled thermogravimetric analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 22:1187–1195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGeehin, J, Burr, GS, Jull, AJT, Reines, D, Gosse, J, Davis, PT, Muhs, D, Southon, JR. 2001. Stepped-combustion 14C dating of sediment: a comparison with established techniques. Radiocarbon 43:255–261.Google Scholar
Plante, AF, Beaupré, SR, Roberts, ML, Baisden, T. 2013. Distribution of radiocarbon ages in soil organic matter by thermal fractionation. Radiocarbon 55:1077–1083.Google Scholar
Rosenheim, BE, Day, MB, Domack, E, Schrum, H, Benthien, A, Hayes, JM. 2008. Antarctic sediment chronology by programmed-temperature pyrolysis: methodology and data treatment. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 9.Google Scholar
Sanderman, J, Grandy, AS. 2020. Ramped thermal analysis for isolating biologically meaningful soil organic matter fractions with distinct residence times. SOIL 6:131–144.Google Scholar
Schuur, EAG, Carbone, MS, Hicks Pries, CE, Hopkins, FM, Natali, SM. 2016. Radiocarbon in terrestrial systems. In: Schurr, EAG, Druffel, ERM, Trumbore, SE, editors. Radiocarbon and climate change. Springer.Google Scholar
Slota, P, Jull, AJT, Linick, T, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29:303–306.Google Scholar
Smeaton, C, Austin, WEN. 2022. Quality not quantity: Prioritizing the management of sedimentary organic matter across continental shelf seas. Geophysical Research Letters 49:e2021GL097481.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19:355363.Google Scholar
Williams, EK, Rosenheim, BE, McNichol, AP, Masiello, CA. 2014. Charring and non-additive chemical reactions during ramped pyrolysis: applications to the characterization of sedimentary and soil organic material. Organic Geochemistry 77:106–114.Google Scholar
Xu, S, Anderson, R, Bryant, C, Cook, GT, Dougans, A, Freeman, S, Naysmith, P, Schnabel, C, Scott, EM. 2004. Capabilities of the new SUERC 5MV AMS facility for 14C dating. Radiocarbon 46(1):59–64.Google Scholar
Zhou, W, Niu, Z, Wu, S, Xiong, X, Hou, Y, Wang, P, Feng, T, Cheng, P, Du, H, Lu, X, et al. 2020. Fossil fuel CO2 traced by radiocarbon in fifteen Chinese cities. Science of the Total Environment 729:138639.Google Scholar