Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:28:15.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building the monarchy of the Father

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2021

Joshua R. Sijuwade Open the ORCID record for Joshua R. Sijuwade [Opens in a new window]
Joshua R. Sijuwade*
Affiliation:
London School of Theology, Northwood, London, HA6 2UW, UK
*
e-mail: joshua.sijuwade@lst.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to provide an explication of the doctrine of the monarchy of the Father. A precisification of the doctrine is made within the building-fundamentality framework provided by Karen Bennett, which enables a further clarification of the central elements of the doctrine to be made and an important objection against it to be answered.

Keywords

BuildingFundamentalityGroundingTrinityMonarchy
Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 436 - 455
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S and Robson, J (2020) Analysing aseity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, P (2012) Grounding: toward a theory of the in-virtue-of relation. Journal of Philosophy 109, 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, L (2004) Nicaea and its Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, L (2010) Augustine and the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basil of Caesarea (1887) On the Holy Spirit. In Schaff, P and Wace, H (eds), A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, vol. 8. Buffalo: The Christian Literature Company, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
Beeley, C (2008) Gregory of Nazianzus on the Trinity and the Knowledge of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behr, J (2018) One God Father Almighty. Modern Theology 34, 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K (2011) By our bootstraps. Philosophical Perspectives 25, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K (2017) Making Things Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branson, B (n.d.) The neglected doctrine of the monarchy of the Father and the analytic debate about the Trinity. In Riaudel, O and Pérez, A (eds), Analytic Theology and the Tri-Personal God. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Cameron, R (2008) Turtles all the way down: regress, priority, and fundamentality. The Philosophical Quarterly 58, 1–14.Google Scholar
Edwards, M (2020) Is subordinationism a heresy? TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 4, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figdor, C (2014) What's the use of an intrinsic property? In Francescotti, RM (ed.), Companion to Intrinsic Properties. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
Fine, K (2012) Guide to ground. In Correia, F and Schnieder, B (eds), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzus (2003) The Fathers of the Church: St. Gregory of Nazianzus select orations trans. Martha Vinson. Washington: The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa (1957) Epistulae. In Courtonne, Y (ed) Saint Basile lettres, vol. 3, Collection des Universités de France. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 1–229.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C (2011) Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive? The Monist 94, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J (1982) Psychophysical supervenience. Philosophical Studies 41, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korbmacher, J (2018) Axiomatic Theories of Partial Ground I. Journal of Philosophical Logic 47, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacugna, C (1999) God For Us: The Trinity And Christian Life. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Langton, R and Lewis, D (1998) Defining ‘intrinsic’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58, 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuenberger, S (2013) Grounding and necessity. Inquiry 57, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D (1983) Extrinsic properties. Philosophical Studies 44, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makin, M (2018) God from god: the essential dependence model of eternal generation. Religious Studies 54, 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, D and Parsons, J (2001) Langton and Lewis on ‘intrinsic’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurin, A (2019) Grounding and metaphysical explanation: it's complicated. Philosophical Studies 176, 1573–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijering, EP (1973) The doctrine of the will and of the Trinity in the orations of Gregory of Nazianzus. Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift 27, 224–234.Google Scholar
Moreland, JP and Craig, WL (2003) Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview. Illinois: Inter-Varsity Press.Google Scholar
Mullins, RT (2020) Trinity, subordination, and heresy: a reply to Mark Edwards. TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 4, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J (2009) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, 2nd Edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, M (2015) Ground. Philosophy Compass 10, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, M (2020) (Re)discovering ground. In Becker, K and Thomson, ID (eds), The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–159.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, G (2015) Grounding is not a strict order. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, G (2010) Metaphysical dependence: grounding and reduction. In Hale, B and Hoffmann, A (eds), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, J (2009) On what grounds what. In Chalmers, D, Manley, D and Wasserman, R (eds), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–383.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J (2012) Grounding, transitivity and contrasitivity. In Correia, F and Schnieder, B (eds), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, J (2016) Grounding in the image of causation. Philosophical Studies 173, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, J (n.d.) Ground functionalism. In Kriegel, U (ed), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Mind 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R (2018) The social theory of the Trinity. Religious Studies 54, 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, N (1990) Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, vol. 1. Nicene I To Lateran V. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Trogdon, K (2013) An introduction to grounding. In Hoeltje, M, Schnieder, B and Steinberg, A (eds), Varieties of Dependence Ontological Dependence, Grounding, Supervenience. Berlin: Philosophia Verlag, pp. 97–122.Google Scholar
Wilson, A (2018) Metaphysical causation. Noûs 52, 723–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witmer, GD, Butchard, W and Trogdon, K (2005) Intrinsicality without naturalness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70, 326–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J (2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yandell, K (2009) How many times does three go into one? In McCall, T and Rea, M (eds), Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar