We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
Central to Buber's philosophy of I-Thou is his understanding of the related notions of dialogue and revelation and his espousal of a non-propositional account of revelation framed in the language and structure of personal dialogical encounter. The consequent re-interpretation of revelation in this form has been widely influential in contemporary theological circles, especially among those theologians and philosophers of religion broadly known as existentialists. However, the wide dissemination and influence of this position does not guarantee its validity. This paper will try to show that the dialogical account of revelation, at least in the form given it by Buber, is logically and philosophically deficient, being based on a set of misleading analogies between inter-human and Divine-human relations.
page 58 note 1 Brown, James, Subject and Object in Modern Theology (1955), p. 115.Google Scholar
page 58 note 2 I and Thou, p. 51.Google Scholar
page 58 note 3 Ibid. p. 33.
page 59 note 1 I and Thou p. 62.Google Scholar
page 60 note 1 Between Man and Man, p. 12.Google Scholar
page 60 note 2 I and Thou, p. 33.Google Scholar
page 60 note 3 I and Thou, pp. 32 f. in Smith's, R. G. translation. (This is the translation of I and Thou referred to throughout this paper.)Google Scholar
page 61 note 1 I and Thou, pp. 110 f.Google Scholar
page 61 note 2 Ibid. p. 112.
page 61 note 3 Eclipse of God, p. 14.Google Scholar
page 61 note 4 A much more detailed summary of Buber's view of revelation will be found in my ‘Buber's Concept of Revelation. Some Critical Reflections’ in Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress of Jewish Studies 1977 (forthcoming).
page 64 note 1 See Buber's discussion of the episode of the ‘Burning Bush’ and the events surrounding this revelation in his book Moses (N.Y., 1959).Google Scholar
page 64 note 2 For more on the philosophical issues being considered here, especially as they touch upon the question of religious experience see my ‘Language, Epistemology and Mystical Pluralism’ in Katz, S. (ed.) Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis (New York 1978).Google Scholar
page 65 note 1 I and Thou, p. 112.Google Scholar
page 67 note 1 Eclipse of God, p. 28.Google Scholar
