We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2021
A key curiosity animating this article concerns how sexual violence is theorised. The work of feminist scholars has been crucial in unearthing ways in which women's traditionally demeaned bodies regularly materialised as ‘easy targets’ for such violence. The gift of the concept of gender has played a significant role in facilitating the production of this corpus of knowledge. Less noticed in the literature, in policy and legislation has been sexual violence against men – an egregious omission. Yet it seems that redeploying the concept of gender to make sense of sexual violence against men and elevate this violence into the realms of theoretical and legislative attention is not straightforward. Identifying feminist work as in part responsible for the rendering of sexual violence against men as too ‘unseen’ in theory provoked my attention, though it's not that I place feminist theory as ‘innocent’ or infallible – far from it. In this article I unpack some of the complexities around theorising sexual politics in Global Politics turning towards the aesthetics of feminist thinking to help reconsider the way connections take shape between gender, sex and violence. Underpinning this discussion are questions about feminist intentions to transform patriarchal and colonial structures and institutions.
1 Hustvedt, Siri, The Blazing World (London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton, 2014), p. 34Google Scholar.
2 Hein, Hilde, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory? The case of aesthetics’, Philosophic Exchange, 21–2 (1990), pp. 21–36 (p. 28)Google Scholar.
3 Das, Veena, ‘Foreword’, in Mookherjee, Nayanika, The Spectral Wound (Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press, 2015), pp. ix–xivCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Dana Gold and Stephen McGlinchey, ‘International Relations theory’, E-International Relations (2017), available at: {https://www.e-ir.info/2017/01/09/international-relations-theory/}; Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, ‘Insecurity redux: The perennial problem of the “point of IR”’, in Dyvik, Synne L., Selby, Jan, and Wilkinson, Rorden (eds), What's the Point of International Relations? (London, UK: Routledge, 2017), pp. 34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dillon, Michael, Deconstructing International Politics (London, UK: Routledge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pin-Fat, Véronique, ‘How do we begin to think about the world?’, in Edkins, Jenny and Zehfuss, Maja (eds), Global Politics: A New Introduction (London, UK: Routledge, 2014), pp. 20–38Google Scholar; Lake, David, ‘Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the Great Debates and the rise of eclecticism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:3 (2013), pp. 567–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Heineman, Elizabeth D., Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leatherman, Janie L., Sexual Violence and Armed Conflict (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2011)Google Scholar; True, Jacqui, The Political Economy of Violence Against Women (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harrington, Carol, ‘Resolution 1325 and post-Cold War feminist politics’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13:4 (2011), pp. 557–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 See Choi, Shine, Selmeczi, Anna, and Strausz, Erzsébet (eds), Critical Methods for the Study of World Politics: Creativity and Trnasformation (London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 2020)Google Scholar; Inayatullah, Naeem and Blaney, David L., International Relations and the Problem of Difference (New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zalewski, Marysia, Feminist International Relations: Exquisite Corpse (London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 King, Katie, Theory in its Feminist Travels (Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.
8 I frequently use the terms ‘men’ and ‘women’ about which I make two points at this juncture – (i) I am not excluding boys or girls (those variably defined as not yet adult) within those terms; (ii) This article largely engages theorisations of sexual violence against men and much of this work invokes the traditional gender binary (men/women – male/female). I will problematise this binary later in the article.
9 Dolan, Chris, ‘Letting go of the gender binary: Charting new pathways for humanitarian intervention on gender-based violence’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96:894 (2015)Google Scholar; Solangon, Sarah and Patel, Preeti, ‘Sexual violence against men in countries affected by armed conflict’, Conflict, Security & Development, 12:4 (2012), pp. 417–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Solangon and Patel, ‘Sexual violence against men in countries affected by armed conflict’, p. 436.
11 Halley, Janet, Split Decisions: How and Why to take a Break from Feminism (Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Jones, Adam, Gender Inclusive: Essays on Violence, Men and Feminist International Relations (London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar; Zalewski, Marysia and Runyan, Anne Sisson, ‘Taking feminist violence seriously in feminist International Relations’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15:3 (2013), pp. 293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 See, for example, Drumond, Paula, ‘What about men? Towards a critical interrogation of sexual violence against men in global politics’, International Affairs, 95:6 (2019), pp. 1271–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ward, Jeanne, ‘It's not about the gender binary, it's about the gender hierarchy: A reply to “Letting go of the gender binary”’, International Review of the Red Cross, 98:1 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Zalewski and Sisson Runyan, ‘Taking feminist violence seriously in feminist International Relations’.
14 Howell, Alison and Montpelier, Melanie Richter, ‘Is securitization theory racist? Civilizationism, methodological whiteness, and anti-black thought in the Copenhagen School’, Security Dialogue, 51:1 (2019), pp. 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sabaratnam, Meera, ‘Is IR theory white? Racialised subject-positioning in three canonical texts’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49:1 (2020), pp. 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Maria Erikson Baaz and Swati Parashar, ‘Race and racism in narratives of insecurity: From the visceral to the global’, Critical Security Studies, available at: {DOI:10.1080/21624887.2021.1904186}.
15 Eisenstein, Zillah, The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism (New York, NY: Longman, 1981)Google Scholar.
16 Sabaratnam, ‘Is IR theory white?’; Acharya, Amitav, ‘Global International Relations (IR) and regional worlds’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4 (2014), pp. 647–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chowdhry, Geeta and Nair, Sheila (eds), Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar; Doty, Roxanne Lynn, ‘The bounds of “race” in International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 22:3 (1993), pp. 443–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anievas, Alexander, Manchanda, Nivi, and Shilliam, Robbie, Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Global Colour Line (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Howell and Richter-Montpetit, ‘Is securitization theory racist?’.
17 Dolan, ‘Letting go of the gender binary’.
18 Chris Dolan, Maria Eriksson Baaz, and Maria Stern, ‘What is sexual about conflict-related sexual violence? Stories from men and women survivors’, International Affairs, 96:5 (2020), pp. 1151–68; Baaz, Maria Eriksson and Stern, Maria, ‘Curious erasures: The sexual in wartime sexual violence’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20:3 (2018), pp. 295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 See Eriksson Baaz and Stern, ‘Curious erasures’.
20 Kramer, Lawrence, After the Lovedeath: Sexual Violence and the Making of Culture (Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 2000)Google Scholar.
21 Zalewski, Marysia, Feminist International Relations: Exquisite Corpse (London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 See Paula Drumond, ‘What about men?’.
23 Sorenau, Raluca and Hudson, David, ‘Feminist scholarship in International Relations and the politics of disciplinary emotion’, Millennium, 37:1 (2008), pp. 123–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Hein, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory’, p. 29.
25 Papenburg, Bettina and Zarzycka, Marta (eds), Carnal Aesthetics: Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics (London, UK: I. B. Tauris, 2013), p. 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
26 Throughout this article I will conjoin words such as sex, gender, violence in varied ways, for example gendersex, sexgender, sexviolence, sex-gender. This is to indicate the persistent inseparability of and shifting connections between these terms.
27 See also, Judith Butler and Elizabeth Weed (eds), The Question of Gender: Joan W. Scott's Critical Feminism (Bloomington, and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press, 2011); Hemmings, Clare, Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory (Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Stern, Maria and Zalewski, Marysia, ‘Feminist fatigues(s): Reflections on feminism and familiar fables of militarization’, Review of International Studies, 35:3 (2009), pp. 611–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mendez, Xhercis, ‘Notes toward a decolonial feminist methodology: Revisiting the race/gender matrix’, Trans-Scripts, 5 (2015), pp. 41–59Google Scholar.
28 Martin, Emily, The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction (Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1989), p. 20Google Scholar. I take this to be about women as an intricate, messy mix of gendersex with myriad imbrications with many other categories and identities.
29 Not exclusively gender, of course.
30 See Laura J. Shepherd (ed.), Handbook on Gender and Violence (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).
31 See Duriesmith, David, ‘Friends don't let friends cite the malestream: A case for strategic silence in feminist International Relations’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22:1 (2020), pp. 26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zalewski, Marysia, ‘Forget(ting) feminism? Investigating relationality in international relations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:5 (20190, pp. 615–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hein, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory’, p. 2.
32 In the context of academic and policy literatures.
33 Sivakumaran, Sandesh, ‘Sexual violence against men in armed conflict’, European Journal of International Law, 18:2 (2007), pp. 253–76 (p. 253)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
34 Feron, Elise, Wartime Sexual Violence Against Men (London, UK: Rowman and Littlefield International, 2018)Google Scholar.
35 See Zalewski, Marysia, Drumond, Paula, Prügl, Elisabeth, and Stern, Maria (eds), Sexual Violence Against Men in Global Politics (London, UK: Routledge, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
36 Solangon, Sarah and Patel, Preeti, ‘Sexual violence against men in countries affected by armed conflict’, Conflict, Security & Development, 12:4 (2012), pp. 417–42 (p. 436)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Carpenter, R. Charli, ‘Gender theory in world politics’, International Studies Review, 4:3 (2002), pp. 153–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adam Jones and Augusta del Zoto, ‘Male-on-Male Sexual Violence in Wartime: Human Rights’ Last Taboo?’, paper presented at the Annual Convention of the ISA, New Orleans, 2002, p. 2.
37 Misra, Amalendu, The Landscape of Silence: Sexual Violence against Men in War (London, UK: Hurst & Company, 2015), pp. 13–14Google Scholar.
38 Eriksson Baaz and Stern, ‘Curious erasures’.
39 Or male and female marked bodies.
40 Will Storr, ‘The rape of men: The darkest secret of war’, Observer-Guardian, available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/jul/17/the-rape-of-men} accessed 6 August 2020.
41 Graham, Ruth, ‘Male rape and the careful construction of the male victim’, Social and Legal Studies, 15:2 (2006), pp. 187–208 (p. 188)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
42 See Brownmiller, Susan, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (New York, NY: Fawcett Books, 1975)Google Scholar; Stanko, Elisabeth A., Everyday Violence: How Women and Men Experience Sexual and Physical Danger (London, UK: Harper Collins, 1990)Google Scholar; Leatherman, Sexual Violence and Armed Conflict.
44 Leatherman, Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict, p. 181; Bourke, Joanna, Rape: A History from 1860 to the Present (London, UK: Virago, 2007)Google Scholar.
45 Jameson, Frederic, ‘The political unconscious’, in Seidman, Steven and Alexander, Jeffrey (eds), The New Social Theory Reader (London, UK: Routledge, 2001), pp. 101–07 (p. 101)Google Scholar.
46 Tomlinson, Barbara, Feminism and Affect at the Scene of the Argument (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2010), p. 1Google Scholar.
47 The Disasters of War (Los desastres de la guerra) is a series of 82 prints created between 1810 and 1820 by the Spanish painter and printmaker Francisco Goya.
48 Martin, The Woman in the Body, p. 20.
49 Gunne, Sorcha and Thompson, Zoë Brigley, Feminism, Literature and Rape Narratives (London, UK: Routledge, 2010), p. xixGoogle Scholar.
50 Sivakumaran, ‘Sexual violence against men in armed conflict’.
51 And the conventional binary remains largely central in these discussions.
52 Anne Marie Goetz, ‘Preventing violence against women: A sluggish cascade?’, Open Democracy (25 November 2014); Ward, ‘It's not about the gender binary, it's about the gender hierarchy’.
53 Kramer, After the Lovedeath.
54 Quoted in Sellers, Susan, The Hélène Cixous Reader (London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 2004), p. 200Google Scholar.
55 Vuong, Ocean, On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous (London, UK: Jonathan Cape, 2019)Google Scholar. See {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQl_qbWwCwU}.
56 Vuong, On Earth, p. 75.
57 Ibid., p. 62.
58 Hein, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory?’, p. 25.
59 Bhattacharyva, Gargi et al. , Empires’ Endgame: Racism and the British State (London, UK: Pluto Press, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Erikson Baaz and Parashar, ‘Race and racism in narratives of insecurity’.
60 Vuong, On Earth, p. 62.
61 Papenburg and Zarzycka (eds), Carnal Aesthetics, p. 5.
62 See Bleiker, Roland, Visual Global Politics (London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
63 Choi, Selmeczi, and Strauss (eds), Critical Methods for the Study of World Politics; Saara Särmä, ‘Collage as an empowering art-based method for IR’, in Choi, Selmeczi, and Strauss (eds), Critical Methods for the Study of World Politics, pp. 289–305.
64 This is a huge body of work, some of which I use in my book. Anonymised.
65 Bleiker, Roland, Aesthetics and World Politics (New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
66 Rancière, Jacques, The Politics of Aesthetics (London, UK: Bloomsbury, 2004)Google Scholar.
67 Bleiker, Aesthetics and World Politics, p. 9.
68 Rancière The Politics of Aesthetics, p. 10.
69 Callahan, William A., Sensible Politics: Visualizing International Relations (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
70 Ibid., p. 37.
71 Ibid., p. 38.
72 Choi, Selmeczi, and Strauss (eds), Critical Methods for the Study of World Politics.
73 Catherine Charrett, ‘Untraining critique and the power of performance’, in Choi, Selmeczi, and Strauss (eds), Critical Methods for the Study of World Politics, pp. 65–82.
74 Highmore, Ben, Ordinary Lives: Studies in the Everyday (London, UK: Routledge, 2011), p. 11Google Scholar.
75 Highmore, Ordinary Lives, p. 122.
76 Papenburg and Zarzycka (eds), Carnal Aesthetics, p. 3.
77 Laing, Olivia, Funny Weather: Art in an Emergency (London, UK: Picador, 2020), p. 286Google Scholar.
78 Which in IR arguably includes much critical theorising.
79 Hein, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory?’, p. 26.
80 Laing, Olivia, The Lonely City: Adventures in the Art of Being Alone (London, UK: Canongate, 2016), p. 59Google Scholar.
81 Highmore, Ordinary Lives, p. 2.
82 Sellers, The Hélène Cixous Reader, p. 97.
83 Sulieman, Susan Rubin, Risking Who One Is: Encounters with Contemporary Art and Literature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994), p. 241Google Scholar.
84 Laing, The Lonely City, p. 24.
85 Rancière, Jacques, The Future of the Image (London, UK and New York, NY: Verso, 2007), p. 7Google Scholar.
86 Ana Carden-Coyne, David Morris, and Tim Wilcox, ‘The Sensory War, 1914–2014’, Manchester Art Gallery, 2014.
87 Laing, The Lonely City, p. 24.
88 Butler and Weed, The Question of Gender, p. 295.
89 Sellers, The Hélène Cixous Reader, p. 200.
90 See Halberstam, Jack, Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2018)Google Scholar.
91 The former Congolese Vice-President Jean-Pierre Bemba, who was brought to trial by the International Criminal Court for Crimes of Sexual Violence in War. See Owen Bowcott, ‘Congo politician guilty in the first ICC trial to focus on rape as a war crime’, Guardian (21 March 2006).
92 Quoted in Puar, Jasbir K., Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), p. 89Google Scholar.
93 Storr, ‘The rape of men’.
94 Philipp Schulz, ‘Male survivors are not “emasculated” but experience “displacement from gendered personhood”’, LSE blog (26 October 2018), available at: {https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2018/10/26/male-survivors-are-not-emasculated-but-experience-displacement-from-gendered-personhood/} accessed 17 August 2020.
95 Butler and Weed, The Question of Gender, p. 307.
96 Ibid.
97 Ibid.
98 Crais, Clifton and Scully, Pamela, Saara Bartman and the Hottentot Venus: A Ghost Story and a Biography (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.
99 Ibid., p. 1.
100 Bumiller, Kirsten, In An Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement Against Sexual Violence (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008), p. 23Google Scholar.
101 Gordon, Avery, Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination (Minneapolis, MN and London, NY: University of Minnesota Press, 2001), p. 185Google Scholar.
102 Trinh T. Minh-ha, ‘Difference: A special Third World women Issue’, Feminist Review, 25 (1987), p. 7.
103 Foluke Ifejola Adebisi, ‘Misogynoir: Did Not Start with Saartjie, Will Not End with Serena’, available at: {https://folukeafrica.com/misogynoir-did-not-start-with-saartjie-will-not-end-with-serena/} accessed 27 July 2020.
104 Frederick Charles Staidum Jr, ‘Too Filthy to be Repeated: Reading Sexualised Violence Against Enslaved Males in U.S. Slave Societies’ (Master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 2007), p. 59.
105 Ibid., p. 82.
106 Ibid., p. 76.
107 Ibid., p. 187.
108 Gayle Rubin, ‘Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality’, in Carol Vance (ed.), Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (London, UK: Routledge, 1984), p. 151.
109 Carol Vance, ‘Social construction theory and sexuality’, in Maurice Berger et al. (eds), Constructing Masculinity (London, UK: Routledge, 1995), p. 47.
110 Ellen E. Jones, ‘Real eroticism is about how somebody's sweat tastes’, Guardian (3 August 2020).
111 Harding, Sandra, The Science Question in Feminism (Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1986), p. 151Google Scholar.
112 Sellers, The Hélène Cixous Reader, p. xxix.
114 Now ex-president, of course – though the impact of blatant misogyny in the figure of the US president remains intense.
115 Kramer, After the Lovedeath, p. 19.
116 Hein, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory?’, p. 33.
