Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T06:07:05.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kliuchevskii's View of the Flow of Russian History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Robert F. Byrnes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The works of Kliuchevskii, from the Boyar Council of Old Russia and studies of saints and historians to the five-volume Course of Russian History, advanced philosophy of history, even though he thought creating such a view impossible. In the judgment of Russia's most influential historian, neither intellectuals nor rulers nor liberals nor conservatives determined the course of events. Instead, the endless interaction of constantly shifting elements gradually produced change, helping every period in a nation's past to ripen into its successor. Almost invisible changes within the economy, social groups, and administration and the gradual growth of Western influence over centuries constituted the steps that determined Russian history's slow flow. Kliuchevskii never read Marx and Marxist thought did not affect him, but he awakened many to the role of economic forces and helped prepare for some Russians' acceptance of Marxism.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 565 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I am grateful to IREX for enabling me to conduct research in Russian libraries and archives. I also appreciate support from Indiana University, the Fulbright Commission, the Hoover Institution, the Kennan Center for Advanced Russian Studies, and the Earhart Foundation.

1. Archives of the Institute of History, Academy of Sciences, Moscow (hereafter ANIIM), Vasilii O. Kliuchevskii (hereafter VOK) archives, f. 4, o. 1, d. 27, “Metodologiia i terminologiia, Programma i kurs lektsii chitannyi v Moskovskom

2. VOK, “Metodologiia russkoi istorii 1884–1885 ak. god,” Sochineniia v deviati tomakh (Moscow, 1987–1989), VI: 3–55, 57–72, 87–92, especially 2–4, 7–8, 24–26, 32–35, 59–66Google Scholar; VOK, “Prilozhenie k kursu ‘Metodologiia russkoi istorii,’” Ibid., pp. 392–95; VOK, Pis'ma, pp. 89–92, 265Google Scholar; Bogoslovskii, Mikhail M., “Professor Vasilii Osipovich Kliuchevskii,” Pamiati pochivshikh nastavnikov (Sergiev Posad, 1914), pp. 347–50Google Scholar; Bogoslovskii, , “V. O. Kliuchevskii kak uchenyi,” V. O. Kliuchevskii. Kharakteristiki i vospominaniia (Moscow, 1912), pp. 36, 38Google Scholar; Boris I. Syromiatnikov, “V. O. Kliuchevskii i B. N. Chicherin,” Ibid., p. 61; Golubtsov, Sergei A., “Teoreticheskie vzgliady V. O. Kliuchevskogo,” Russkii istoricheskii zhurnal, VIII(1922), 178–82Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, Vadim A. and Zimin, A. A., “Kommentarii,” VOK, Kurs russkoi istorii. Sochineniia (Moscow, 1956–1958), III: 374Google Scholar; Marc Raeff, RussiansAbroad. A Cultural History of Russian Emigration, 1919–1939 (New York: 1990), pp. 165–66, 176.Google Scholar

3. Vok, , “Metodologiia i terminologiia,” pp. 3–8, 31–35, 81–86, 91–92Google Scholar; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, I: 13–14, 18–25, 31–40, 284–86Google Scholar; II: 128–29; Vok, , Boiarskaia duma drevnei Rusi (Moscow, 1902), pp. 40,163–68, 240–43Google Scholar; Vok, , Lektsii po russkoi istorii professora Moskovskogo universiteta V. O. Kliuchevskogo (St. Petersburg, 1902), I: iiiGoogle Scholar; Vok, , “Boiarskaia duma drevnei Rusi,” Russkaia mysl', 1, no. 1, part 2, 1880, 48Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii v Rossii,” Sochineniia, VI: 285–88, 297–98, 305Google Scholar; Vok, , Pis'ma, pp. 283–84Google Scholar; Shkurinov, Pavel S., Positivizm v Rossii XIX v. (Moscow, 1980), pp. 312–13Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” I: 411Google Scholar.

4. VOK, “Metodologiiai terminologiia,” pp. 88–92,104Google Scholar; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, 1:18–19Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” pp. 285–86Google Scholar; VOK, Pis'ma, pp. 24, 207–208, 282–83, 287–90Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” I: 380–82Google Scholar; Golubtsov, , “Teoreticheskie vzgliady,” pp. 199–200.Google Scholar

5. ANIIM, VOK archive, f. 4, o. 1, d. 28; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, I: 24–5Google Scholar; IV: 368; VOK, “Metodologiia i terminologiia,” pp. 3–8, 31–38, 132–33Google Scholar; VOK, “Terminologiia russkoi istorii,” Sochineniia v deviati tomakh, VI: 180–82Google Scholar; VOK, Pis'ma, pp. 241, 246, 282–84Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” I: 410–12; III: 371–72Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, Vadim A., Zimin, A. A., and Kireeva, Raisa A., “Kommentarii k kursu lektsii po istochnikovedeniiu,” VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, VI: 475Google Scholar; Becker, Seymour, Nobility and Privilege in Late Imperial Russia, (De Kalb, IL, 1988), pp. 55–56Google Scholar; Shkurinov, , Pozitivizm, pp. 315–18.Google Scholar

6. ANIIM, VOK archive, f. 4, o. 1, d. 93, “Konspekt 3-kh klassov vvodnykh lektsii po russkoi istorii, Uchilishche Vaianiia i…;” d. 94, “Lektsii (4 vecher) o krasoti i pom. v drevnei Rusi;” VOK. “O vzgliade khudozhnika na obstanovku i ubor izobrazhaemogo im litsa,” Istoricheskie portrety (Moscow, 1990), pp. 29–39Google Scholar; VOK, “Nabroski,” Sochineniia v deviati totnakh, IX: 466–67.Google Scholar

7. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 13–30,105–13,139–50Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriiasoslovii,” pp. 285, 294–96, 464Google Scholar; VOK, “Lektsii po russkoi istoriografii,” Sochineniia, VIII: 181–86Google Scholar; VOK, Pis'ma, pp. 152, 241, 282–83Google Scholar.

8. VOK, Boiarskaia duma drevnei Rusi (Moscow, 1882)Google Scholar; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, I: 31–34Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” pp. 472–73Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, , “Posleslovie,” VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia v deviati tomakh, I:379–81Google Scholar; Kireeva, Raisa A., Izuchenie otechestvennoi istoriografii v dorevoliutsionnoi Rossii s serediny XIX v. do 1917 g. (Moscow, 1983), pp. 30–40,114–19Google Scholar; Kireeva, , “Posleslovie,” VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia v deviati tomakh, VI: 433–35Google Scholar; VII: 432–35, Zimin, and Kireeva, , “Iz rukopisnogo naslediia Kliuchevskogo,” pp. 307–309Google Scholar; Kizevetter, A. A., “Klyuchevsky and his Course of Russian History,” Slavic Review 1 (1922): 510–11Google Scholar; Torke, Hans, “Kliuchevskii's Istoriia Soslovii,” Canadian-American Slavic Studies, XX, no. 3–4 (1986): 311Google Scholar;.Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., The Image of Peter the Great in Russian History and Thought (New York, 1985), pp. 175–76Google Scholar.

9. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 5–7,105–128, 330–68Google Scholar; VOK, Boiarskaia duma, pp. 75, 83–7, 163–68, 240–43Google Scholar; VOK, “Metodologiia i terminologiia,” pp. 3–8Google Scholar; VOK, “Terminologiia,” pp. 131–35Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, , “Posleslovie,” VOK, Sochineniia v deviati tomakh, II: 379–81Google Scholar; Aleksandr Lappo-Danilevskii, “Istoricheskie vzglaidy V. O. Kliuchevskogo,” Kliuchevskii. Kharakteristiki i vospominaniia, p. 112.Google Scholar

10. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 3–42, 49–53,105–138,151–56, 208, 271, 320, 330–32, 395–97, 436Google Scholar; III: 207–209; IV: 405–408; VOK, Boiarskaia duma, pp. 73–74Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” pp. 366-71, 376Google Scholar; VOK, Posobie dlia podgotovleniia k polukursovomu ispytaniiu po russkoi istorii (Moscow, 1897), pp. 196–200Google Scholar; Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 402, 414-7Google Scholar; Cherepnin, Lev V., Obrazovanie russkogo tsentralizovannogo gosudarstva v XIV-XV vekakh (Moscow, 1960), pp. 77-9.Google Scholar

11. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 55–76, 87–8, 97–104, 107–108Google Scholar; VOK, Boiarskaia duma, pp. 73–74, 182–84Google Scholar; VOK, “Pskovskie spory,” Sochineniia, VII: 45Google Scholar; VOK, “Metodologiia russkoi istorii,” pp. 7–8, 24–6, 32–5Google Scholar; Fedotov, Georges P., The Russian Religious Mind (Cambridge, 1966), 1:186Google Scholar; Vernadsky, George, The Mongols and Russia (New Haven, 1953), 242–4.Google Scholar

12. VOK, Kurs russkoi istorii (Moscow, 1937), II: 146Google Scholar; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 42–44Google Scholar; VOK, Boiarskaia duma, 12–3, 240–42Google Scholar; VOK, “K. N. Besruzhev-Ri imin,” Neopublikovannye proizvedeniia (Moscow, 1983), p. 155Google Scholar; VOK, “Znachenie prepodobnogo Sergeia dlia russkogo naroda i gosudarstva,” Bogoslovskii vestnik, 4, no. 11 (1892): 201–202Google Scholar; Got'e, Iurii V., “Primechaniia,” VOK, Kurs (Moscow, 1937), II: 427Google Scholar; Cherepnin, , Obrazovanie russkogo tsentralizovannogo gosudarstva, pp 72–4Google Scholar; Ostrowski, Donald, “The Mongol Origins of Muscovite Political Institutions,” Slavic Review, 49, no. 4 (1990): 525–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 172–89Google Scholar; III: 213.

14. VOK, “Proiskhozdenie krepostnogo prava v Rossii,” Opyty i izslevdovaniia Pervyi sbornik statei (Moscow, 1912), pp. 212–310Google Scholar; VOK, “Podushnaia podat' i otmena kholopstva v Rossii,” Ibid., pp. 311–416; D'iakonov, Mikhail A., “Zadvornye liudi,” Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniia, No. 12,1897,391–98Google Scholar; Got', “Primechaniia,” p. 433Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” II: 403–404Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, , “Posleslovie,” II: 388–89Google Scholar; Grekov, Boris D., Kievskaia Rus' (Moscow, 1953), pp. 171–75Google Scholar; Grekov, , Krest'iane na Rusi s drevneishikh vremen do XVII veka (Moscow, 1952–1954), I: 11,143–45,164,172,183, 263–65Google Scholar; Cherepnin, Lev V., “V. O. Kliuchevskii,” Academy of Sciences. Institute of History, Ocherki istorii istorichesk nauki (Moscow, 1955–1985), II: 155–56Google Scholar; Hellie, Richard, Enserfment and Military Change in Muscovy (Chicago, 1971), pp. 1–9, 276–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hellie, , Slavery in Russia, 1450–1725 (Chicago, 1982), pp. 1–9,141–42, 374–75Google Scholar.

15. VOK, “Proiskhozhdenie krepostnogo prava,” pp. 226, 258–68, 308–310Google Scholar; VOK, “Krepostnoi vopros nakanune ego zakonodatel'nogo vozbuzhdeniia,” Otzyvy i otvety. Tretii sbornik statei (Moscow, 1914), pp. 310–20Google Scholar; VOK, Boiarskaia duma, pp. 225–31; 304Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” pp. 328–33, 427–34.Google Scholar

16. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 287–96, 309–28Google Scholar; III: 162–73, 185, 187–200, 213–20, 280–84; IV: 92–100, 311; V: 83–4; VOK, “Proiskhozhdenie krepostnogo prava,” pp. 230, 262Google Scholar; VOK, “Dobrye liudi drevnei Rusi,” Ocherki i rechi. Vtoroi sbornik statei (Moscow, 1913), p. 157Google Scholar; VOK, “Krepostnoi vopros,” pp. 301–302Google Scholar; Nechkina, Militsa, Vasilii Osipovich Kliuchevskii; istoriia zhizri i tvorchestva (Moscow, 1974), pp. 586-87.Google Scholar

17. VOK. Kurs, Sochineniia, IV: 102–106, 317–29Google Scholar; V: 80–108, 136–37; VOK. “Proiskhozhdenie krepostnogo prava,” pp. 300–301, 310–32, 410–14Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” p. 328Google Scholar; VOK, “Podushnaia podat',” pp. 322–24Google Scholar; Anisimov, Evgenii V., Podatnaia reforma Petra I. Vvedenie podushnoi podati v Rossii, 1719–1728 (Leningrad, 1982), pp. 3–9,147–50, 274–75Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” V: 395–98.Google Scholar

18. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, III: 187–200Google Scholar; VOK, Kurs russkoi istorii (Moscow, 1921), V: 99–125, 136–37Google Scholar; VOK, Kratkoe posobie po russkoi istorii (Vladimir, 1909), 171–73.Google Scholar

19. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, III: 187, 213–20; V: 99–125,136–37,273–75, 468.Google Scholar

20. ANIIM, VOK archive, f. 4, o. 1, d. 26, 27, 223; f. 44; Manuscript Division, Lenin Library (hereafter GBL), VOK archive, f. 131, o. 23, d. 3, “Aleksandr II. Lektsii po istorii tsarstvovaniia,” pp. 57–66; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, I: 38Google Scholar; IV: 225–32, 311–15; V: 188–91, 225–32, 264–71, 371–78, 468, 486; Vok, , “Noveishaia istoriia Zapadnoi Evropy v sviazi s istoriei Rossii,” Neopublikovannye, pp. 285–89Google Scholar; VOK, “Otmena krepostnogo prava,” Sochineniia, V: 371–93Google Scholar; VOK. Kratkoe posobie, pp. 175–76Google Scholar; Nechkina, , Kliuchevskii, 563–68.Google Scholar

21. Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” V: 464–88.Google Scholar

22. VOK, “Krepostnoi vopros,” pp. 301–20Google Scholar; VOK, “Pravo i fakt v istorii krest'ianskogo voprosa. Pis'mo k redaktoru,” Rus', No. 28, 05 23,1881, pp. 14–17Google Scholar; VOK, “Russkaia istoriografiia 1861–1893 gg.,” Neopublikovannye, pp. 181-83Google Scholar; Nechkina, , Kliuchevskii, 207–209, 212–18.Google Scholar

17 ; VOK, “Russkaia istoriografiia 1861–1893 gg.,” Neopublikovannye, pp. 181–83Google Scholar; Nechkina, , Kliuchevskii, 207–209, 212–18.Google Scholar

23. ANIIM, VOK archive, f. 4, o. 1, d. 223, 224; f. 26, d. 73; VOK, Kurs, Sochinenik, I: 38Google Scholar; IV: 311–15; V: 468; VOK, Kurs (Moscow, 1921), V: 270–71Google Scholar; VOK, “Otmena krepostnogo prava,” pp. 380–89Google Scholar; VOK, Kratkoe posobie, pp. 179–83Google Scholar; VOK “Noveishaia istoriia Zapadnoi Evropy,” pp. 285–89Google Scholar; VOK, Pis'ma, p. 332.Google Scholar

24. ANIIM, VOK archive, f. 4, o. 1, d. 26, 223; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, II: 247–50, 297–308Google Scholar; V: 271–80; VOK, “Metodologiia russkoi istorii,” pp. 85–6Google Scholar; VOK, “Prilozhenie k kursu ‘Metodologiia russkoi istorii’” p. 398Google Scholar; VOK, Kratkoe posobie, pp. 171–76Google Scholar; VOK, “Krepostnoi vopros,” pp. 300–308.Google Scholar

25. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, 1: 20.Google Scholar

26. Ibid., pp. 37–8; V: 271–9; VOK, “S. M. Solov'ev kak prepodavatel',” Ocherki i rechi, pp. 24–35Google Scholar; VOK, “Terminologiia,” p. 183Google Scholar; VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” pp. 259, 358–59Google Scholar; Vok, , “Metodologiia russkoi istorii,” pp. 44–45Google Scholar; VOK, “Noveishaia istoriia Zapadnoi Evropy,” pp. 277–81Google Scholar; Grekov, , “Kievskaia Rus' i problema proiskhozhdeniia russkogo feodalizma u M. N. Pokrovskogo,” Izbmnnye trudy (Moscow, 1957–60), II: 442–53Google Scholar; Bogoslovskii, , “Kliuchevskii,” pp. 347–50Google Scholar; Cherepnin, , “Kliuchevskii,” p. 153Google Scholar; Golubtsov, , “Teoreticheskie vzgliady,” pp. 191–92.Google Scholar

27. VOK, Kratkoe posobie, 152–4, 192, 199–200.Google Scholar

28. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, III: 319–29Google Scholar; VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia v deviati tomakh IV: 203–204Google Scholar; VOK, “O vzgliade khudozhnika,” pp. 296–305Google Scholar; VOK, “Vospominaniia o N. I. Novikove i ego vremeni,“ Russkaia mysl', 16, no. 1 (1895): 55Google Scholar; Iulii I. Aikhenvald, “Kliuchevskii myslitel' i khudozhnik,“ Kliuchevskii. Kharakteristiki vospominaniia, p. 141; Veniamin M. Khvostov, “Istoricheskoe mirovozzrenie Kliuchevskogo, V. O,” Nravstennaia lichnost' i obshchestvo. Ocherki po etike i sotsiolo (Moscow, 1910), pp. 38–40Google Scholar; Maklakov, Basil, “Klyuchevsky,” Slavonic Review, 13 (1935): 327–28Google Scholar; Bolsover, George H., “Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historiography,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Series V, 7 (1957): 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Riasanovsky, , The Image of Peter the Great, pp. 175–76.Google Scholar

29. VOK, Noveishaia istoriia. Lektsii chit. 3-m Voen. Aleksandrovsk. uchilishche Kurs 1882–1883 ucheb. goda (Moscow, 1883), pp. 13–15.Google Scholar

30. Aleksandrov, Vadim A., ed., V. O. Kliuchevskii. Istoricheskie portrety. Deiateli istoricheskoi mysli (Moscow, 1990), p. 8.Google Scholar

31. GBL, VOK archive, f. 131, o. 40, d. 13, “Zapiski po Vseobshchei Istorii. Lektsii chitannye v Aleksandrovskom voennom uchilishche v 1871–72 i 1872–73 gg.,” pp. 4–21,57–69; Aleksandrov, , “Kliuchevskii,” p. 18.Google Scholar

32. ANIIM, VOK archive, f. 4, o. 1, d. 150; VOK, Kurs, Sochinenik, II: 170–71, 183–89Google Scholar; III, 27–28, 362–64; VOK, “Kn. V. V. Golitsyn. Podgotovka i programma reformy,” Istoricheskie portrety, pp. 139–50Google Scholar; “Chestvovanie V. O. Kliuchevskogo,” Istoricheskii vestnik, 87, no. 2 (1902): 751–52Google Scholar; Kizevetter, A. A., “Pervyi kurs V. O. Kliuchevskogo, 1873–1874,” Russkii nauchnyi institut, Belgrade. Zapiski, 3 (1931), 292–97.Google Scholar

33. VOK, Kurs, IV: 273–93Google Scholar; VOK, “Perr Velikii sredi svoikh sotrudnikov,” Ocherki i rechi, pp. 474–76Google Scholar; VOK, “Imperatritsa Ekaterina II, 1729–96,” Ibid., pp. 312–88; VOK, “Zapadnoe vliianie v Rossii posle Petra,” Neopublikovannye, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar

34. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, III: 319–29Google Scholar; VOK, “Kurs lektsii po istochnikovedeniiu,” Sochineniia, VI: 26–32Google Scholar; VOK, “V. N. Tatishchev,” Neopublikovannye, p. 129Google Scholar; VOK, “O vzgliade khudozhnika,” pp. 296–304.Google Scholar

35. VOK, “Avtobiografiia,” Neopublikowannye, pp. 342–47Google Scholar; Aleksandrov, and Zimin, , “Kommentarii,” V: 431.Google Scholar

36. VOK, Noveishaia istoriia. Lektsii chit, v 3-m voen, Aleksandrovsk. uchilishche. Kurs 1882–1883 ucheb. goda (Moscow, 1883), pp. 11–15Google Scholar; VOK, “Ob intelligentsia” Neopublikovannye, pp. 298–302Google Scholar; VOK, “Pis'mo frantsuzhenki,” Ibid., pp. 326–33; VOK, “Prilozhenie k kursu 'Noveishaia istoriia Zapadnoi Evropy v sviazi s istoriei Rossii,” Ibid., pp. 367–70; VOK, “O vzgliade khudozhnika,” pp. 174–89Google Scholar; VOK, “Avtobiografiia,” pp. 342–47Google Scholar; VOK, Pis'ma, pp. 228–29, 260, 333, 336, 342, 347, 374Google Scholar; Barsov, Elpidifor, “Mnenie V. O. Kliuchevskogo o Maksime Gor'kom. Zapisano 25 sent. 1907 g.,“ U Troitsy v Akademii, 1814–1914 (Moscow, 1914), pp. 692–93Google Scholar; Smirnov, Sergei I. reds., “V. O. Kliuchevskii v ego ponimanii natsional' nogo vospitaniia,” Volzhenin, Vladimir, Dinze, V. F., and Smirnov, S. D., eds., O natsional' noi shkole. Sbornik (Petrograd, 1916), pp. 68–72Google Scholar; Kassow, Samuel D., “The Russian University in Crisis, 1899–1911”, (Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 1976), p. 712.Google Scholar

37. VOK, Pis'ma, pp. 260, 336.Google Scholar

38. Ibid., pp. 228–41, 338, 342, 379.

39. VOK, Kurs, Sochineniia, I: 34–37Google Scholar; III: 126–27; VOK, “Vechernie chteniia v Abastumane,” Neopublikovannye, p. 296Google Scholar; VOK, “Ob intelligentsia” pp. 300–301Google Scholar; VOK, Pis'ma, p. 322Google Scholar; Pares, Bernard, “The Peterhof Conference, (On the Draft Project of the Imperial Duma), 08 1–5,1905,”Google ScholarRussian Review, November, 1913, p. 116.

40. VOK, “Istoriia soslovii,” Sochineniia v deviati tomakh, VI: 233–36Google Scholar; VOK, “Aleksandr II,” p. 62.Google Scholar

41. Karataev, Nikolai K., Ekonomicheskie nauki v Moskovskom universitete, 1755–1955 (Moscow, 1956), pp. 194–202Google Scholar; Shteingauz, Iziaslav X., Sotsiologicheshie vzgliady V. O. Kliuchevskogo (Irkutsk, 1974), IIGoogle Scholar; Tkhorzhevskii, Sergei I., “V. O. Kliuchevskii kak sotsiolog i politicheskii myslitel',” Dela i dni, II (1921): 204–205Google Scholar; Nechkina, , Kliuchevskii, pp. 176–77, 262, 592–93.Google Scholar

42. Archives of the Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Alexei I. Iakolev archive, f. 640, o. 1, d. 40, “Vospominaniia o V. O. Kliuchevskom;” Got'e, Iurii V., Time of Troubles. The Diary of Iurii Vladimirovich Got'e. Moscow, July 8,1917-July 23,1922, trans., ed., and intro. Emmons, Terence J. (Princeton, 1988), pp. 133–34Google Scholar; VOK, Pis' ma, pp. 269, 465–66Google Scholar; Iakovlev, , “Primechaniia,” VOK, Kurs (Moscow, 1937), I: 385–90Google Scholar; Nechkina, , Kliuchevskii, pp. 41–42, 372, 381–82, 607.Google Scholar