Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:32:56.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promises to the Dead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

James Stacey Taylor
James Stacey Taylor*
Affiliation:
The College of New Jersey
*
jtaylor@tcnj.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many people attempt to give meaning to their lives by pursuing projects that they believe will bear fruit after they have died. Knowing that their death will preclude them from protecting or promoting such projects people who draw meaning from them will often attempt to secure their continuance by securing promises from others to serve as their caretakers after they die. But those who rely on such are faced with a problem: None of the four major accounts that have been developed to explain directed promissory obligation (the Authority View, the Trust View, the Assurance View, and the Reliance View) support the view that we are obligated to keep our promises to persons who are now dead. But I will provide hope for those who wish to use such promises to protect the meaning with which they have endowed their lives. I will argue that while we cannot wrong a person who is now dead by breaking a promise made to her during her life, we could wrong the living by so doing. We thus (might) have reason to keep the promises that we made to those who are now dead.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 90: Death and Meaning , October 2021 , pp. 81 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belliotti, Raymond A., ‘Do Dead Human Beings Have Rights?’ The Personalist 60 (1979), 201–210.Google Scholar
Blustein, Jeffrey, The Moral Demands of Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cargile, James, ‘Utilitarianism and the Desert Island Problem,’ Analysis 25 (1964), 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, ‘Demystifying Promises,’ in Sheinman, , ed. Promises and Agreements, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressel, Ashley, ‘Directed Obligations and the Trouble with Deathbed Promises,’ Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2015), 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, ‘Harm to Others,’ in Martin Fischer, John, ed., The Metaphysics of Death (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Fried, Charles, Contract as Promise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Friedrich, Daniel and Southwood, Nicholas, ‘Promises and Trust,’ in Sheinman, , Promises and Agreements (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 275–92.Google Scholar
Griffin, James, Well-Being: Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Import (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Griseri, Paul, ‘Can a Dead Man be Harmed?’ Philosophical Investigations 10 (1987), 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, Dorothy, ‘Posthumous Harm,’ The Philosophical Quarterly 39 (1989), 334–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M., Freedom and Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Hume, David, Treatise on Human Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory S., ‘The Toxin Puzzle,’ Analysis, 41, (1983), 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Richard, What is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, Nelson P., ‘Posthumous Rehabilitation and the Dust-Bin of History,’ Public Affairs Quarterly 4 (1990), 267–286.Google Scholar
Levenbook, Barbara Baum, ‘Harming Someone after His Death,’ Ethics 94 (1984), 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberto, Hallie, ‘Promissory Obligation: Against a Unified Account,’ in Timmons., , ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 6 (2017), 102–122.Google Scholar
Lomasky, Loren E., Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism (Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Co., 1978).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, ‘Death,’ Nous 4 (1970), 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narveson, Jan, ‘Promising, Expecting, and Utility,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1971), 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norcross, Alastair, ‘Act-utilitarianism and Promissory Obligation,’ in Sheinman, Hanoch, ed., Promises and Agreements: Philosophical Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David, ‘A Simple Theory of Promising,’ Philosophical Review 115 (2006), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David, ‘Duress, Deception, and the Validity of a Promise,’ Mind 166 (2007), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David, Shaping the Normative Landscape (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, Ernest, ‘Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect,’ Ethics 91 (1981), 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, George, ‘The Misfortunes of the Dead,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1984), 183–88.Google Scholar
Portmore, Douglas, ‘Desire Fulfillment and Posthumous Harm,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2007), 27–38.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice: Revised edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Robins, Michael R., Promising, Intending, and Moral Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. The Right and the Good, ed. Stratton-Lake, Philip (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Abraham Sessu, ‘Intention, Expectation, and Promissory Obligation,’ Ethics 127 (2016), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Serafini, Anthony, ‘Callahan on Harming the Dead,’ Journal of Philosophical Research 15 (1989–1990), 329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheinman, Hanoch, ‘Introduction: Promises and Agreements,’ in Sheinman, , ed., Promises and Agreements (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Harry S., ‘A Note on Hare on Imagining Oneself in the Place of Others,’ Mind 81 (1972), 448–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J.J.C., ‘Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism,’ The Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956), 344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, Daniel, Posthumous Interests: Legal and Ethical Perspectives (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Taylor, James Stacey, ‘The Myth of Posthumous Harm,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2005), 311–22.Google Scholar
Taylor, James Stacey, Death, Posthumous Harm, and Bioethics (New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James Stacey, Markets with Limits: How the commodification of academia derails debate (New York: Routledge, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Thomson, J.J., The Realm of Rights (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Valdman, Mikhail, ‘Outsourcing Self-Government,’ Ethics 120, 4 (2010), 761–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Carl, Real Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Jeremy, J. Wisnewski, ‘What We Owe the Dead,’ Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2009), 54–70.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan, ‘Two Concepts of Rule Utilitarianism,’ in Timmons, Mark, ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 6 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), 123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Jack, ‘The Normative Force of Promising,’ in Timmons., , ed., Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 6 (2017), 77–101.Google Scholar