Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-18T19:28:34.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

After the Revolution: Youth, Democracy, and the Politics of Disappointment in Serbia. By Jessica Greenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014. ix, 235 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $27.95, paper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Paul Manning
Paul Manning*
Affiliation:
Trent University, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Featured Reviews
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , Fall 2015 , pp. 597 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. On these points, see Bishara, Amahl, “Watching U.S. Television from the Palestinian Street: The Media, the State, and Representational Interventions,” Cultural Anthropology 23, no. 3 (August 2008): 488–530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laurier, Eric and Philo, Chris, “‘A Parcel of Muddling Muckworms’: Revisiting Habermas and the Early Modern English Coffee-Houses,” Social&Cultural Geography 8, no. 2 (April 2007): 259–81Google Scholar; Manning, Paul, “Rose-Colored Glasses? Color Revolutions and Cartoon Chaos in Postsocialist Georgia,” Cultural Anthropology 22, no. 2 (May 2007): 171–213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Montag, Warren, “The Pressure of the Street: Habermas's Fear of the Masses,” in Hill, Mike and Montag, Warren, eds., Masses, Classes, and the Public Sphere (London, 2000), 132–45Google Scholar.