Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T06:06:33.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Postregistration Laws Affect the Turnout of Citizens Registered to Vote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Raymond E. Wolfinger ,
Benjamin Highton  and
Megan Mullin
Raymond E. Wolfinger
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Benjamin Highton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Megan Mullin
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A well-established scholarly tradition links lower voting costs with higher turnout. Whereas previous research emphasized the costs imposed by requiring voter registration, our research assesses postregistration costs and state policies that can make it easier for registered citizens to vote. These policies include mailing each registrant a sample ballot and information about the location of his or her polling place, providing a longer voting day, and requiring firms to give their employees time off to vote. Using the 2000 Voter Supplement to the Current Population Survey, we find that all but the last of these provisions enhance turnout, especially by the young and the less educated. Compared to a state that does none of these things, the estimated turnout of high school dropouts is nearly 11 percentage points higher in a state with these “best practices”; their effect on young registrants is nearly 10 points. Because African American and Latino registrants are disproportionately younger and less educated, they would benefit disproportionately from universal adoption of such postregistration laws. We estimate that if every state adopted these best practices, overall turnout of those registered would increase approximately three percentage points.

Type
2002 SPPQ Best Paper Award Winner
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 2005 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2002. Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Brehm, John. 1993. The Phantom Respondents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Kinder, Donald R., Rosenstone, Steven J., Sapiro, Virginia, and the National Election Studies. 2002. American National Election Study, 2000: Pre- and Post-Election Survey [computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2001. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Highton, Benjamin. 2002. How Race, Ethnicity, and Immigration Shape the California Electorate. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Cochran, John. 2001. “Election Overhaul Regains Spotlight with Introduction of Competing Bills to Assist States and Set Standards.” CQ Weekly (May 19):1150.Google Scholar
de la Garza, Rodolfo. 2001. “Promoting Equal Access to the Electoral System.” In The Mechanics of Election Reform: From Registration to Results. Washington, DC: Consortium of Social Science Associations.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1981. “Why Do People Vote? Because They Are Registered.” American Politics Quarterly 9:259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, David P., Squire, Peverill, and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 1983. “Voter Turnout: An International Comparison.” Public Opinion 16 (December/January):49–55.Google Scholar
Highton, Benjamin. 1997. “Easy Registration and Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 59:565–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton, Benjamin. 2004. “Voter Registration and Turnout in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 2:507–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton, Benjamin, and Burris, Arthur L.. 2002. “New Perspectives on Latino Voter Turnout in the United States.” American Politics Research 30:285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton, Benjamin, and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 1998. “Estimating the Effects of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.” Political Behavior 20:79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highton, Benjamin, and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 2001. “The First Seven Years of the Political Life Cycle.” American Journal of Political Science 45:202–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert A. 1996. “A Reassessment of Voter Mobilization.” Political Research Quarterly 49:331–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Nagler, Jonathan. 1992. “Individual and Systemic Influences on Turnout: Who Votes? 1984.” Journal of Politics 54:718–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1991. The International Almanac of Electoral History. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. 2001. “An Agenda for Election Reform.” Brookings Policy Brief. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1991. “The Effect of Registration Laws and Education on U.S. Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 85:1394–405.Google Scholar
Nagler, Jonathan. 1994. “Scobit: An Alternative Estimator to Logit and Probit.” American Journal of Political Science 38:230–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Commission on Federal Election Reform. 2001. To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process. Charlottesville, VA: Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman. 2001. “Recommendations for Congressional Actions.” In The Constitution Project Election Initiative. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1988. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill, Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Glass, David P.. 1987. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 81:45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and Kent Jennings, M.. 1995. “Life Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.” American Political Science Review 89:431–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Al. 1984. United States House of Representatives Committee on House Administration, Task Force on Elections, 98th Cong., 2nd sess., 21 March.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 1993. From Protest to Politics. New York and Cambridge, MA: Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Timpone, Richard J. 1998. “Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States.” American Political Science Review 92:145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2001. Current Population Survey: Voter Supplement File, November 2000 [computer file]. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census [producer], 2001. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2001: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2001.Google Scholar
Vedlitz, Arnold. 1985. “Voter Registration Drives and Black Voting in the South.” Journal of Politics 47:643–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar