Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T18:35:28.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinematics of Star Clusters in M33: Distinct Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Rupali Chandar
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
Luciana Bianchi
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
Holland C. Ford
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
Ata Sarajedini
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, P. O. Box 112055, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyse star cluster properties in the nearby spiral galaxy M33, combining our extensive HST WFPC2 photometry and ground-based follow up spectroscopy. These data show that cluster velocity dispersion increases with age. Simulations comparing synthetic disk and halo populations with observations indicate a composite disk/halo system for the old M33 clusters. The best fit fraction of 85 ± 5% halo plus 15 ± 5% disk differs from that found in the Milky Way, where ∼ 30% of the globular clusters are metal rich objects associated with the bulge and/or thick disk. Spectroscopic line indices for a halo subsample (17 objects) reveal an age spread of ∼ 5 — 7 Gyr, and little progression in metal abundance with age. This is consistent with a chaotic formation for a substantial portion of the M33 halo, and also consistent with an accretion origin for a large number of the halo clusters.

Type
Part 1. The Star Clusters of Local Group Galaxies
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2002 

References

Armandroff, T. E. 1989, AJ, 97, 375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, G. et al. 1994, A & AS, 106, 275 Google Scholar
Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., & Ford, H. C. 1999, ApJ, 517, 431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., & Ford, H. C. 2001, A & A, 366, 498 Google Scholar
Chandar, R., Bianchi, L., Ford, H. C., & Sarajedini, A. 2002, ApJ, 564, 712 Google Scholar
Christian, C., & Schommer, R. 1988, AJ, 95, 704 Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Blakeslee, J., & Ryhzov, A. 1998 ApJ, 496, 808 Google Scholar
Huchra, J. P., Kent, S. M., & Brodie, J. P. 1991, ApJ, 370, 495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarajedini, A., Geisler, D., Schommer, R., & Harding, P. 2000, AJ, 120, 2437 Google Scholar
Schommer, R. et al. 1991, AJ, 101, 873 Google Scholar
Worthey, G. 1994, ApJS, 95, 107 Google Scholar
Zinn, R. 1985, ApJ, 293, 424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar