No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Working together when the problem is multi-faceted: understanding inter-agency working for the benefit of people with hoarding problems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2022
Abstract
Hoarding disorder is a surprisingly common problem which impacts on most areas of life. People who hoard typically have multiple agencies involved in their care due to the complex health and safety impact and risks associated with hoarding. ‘Treatment’ involves finding ways of supporting discarding large amounts, typically underpinned by CBT principles. We evaluated the impact and outcomes of a conference designed to boost professionals’ confidence and understanding in working with hoarding problems, both individually and with other agencies with a view to improving inter-agency service provision. Changes in professionals’ confidence and understanding were evaluated immediately before and after the conference. Conference participants’ qualitative responses related to service improvements were analysed using content analysis. People with personal experience of hoarding issues subsequently participated in a focus group where the results of the conference were presented. These data were analysed using thematic analysis. Confidence and understanding in working with hoarding problems substantially increased from pre- to post-conference. Professionals identified a range of possible improvements, most commonly working more closely and improving communication with other agencies. People with personal experience suggested improvements across three over-arching themes: developing an improved understanding of hoarding, the need for improved resources, and improved multi-agency working. A multi-agency conference increased confidence and understanding in professionals working with hoarding problems, and improvements specified by both people with personal experience and professionals provide a useful guide to service improvement. Results provide a framework in which CBT approaches should be embedded.
Key learning aims
(1) To assess the effectiveness of a multi-agency hoarding conference at improving understanding and confidence in working with hoarding problems.
(2) To explore professionals’ perceptions of improvements to multi-agency service provision.
(3) To explore perceptions of improvements that could be made to multi-agency service provision from people with personal experience of hoarding problems.
- Type
- Original Research
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies
References
Further reading
Frost, R. O., & Hartl, T. L. (1996). A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 34, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, O. M., Salkovskis, P. M., & Oldfield, V. B. (2013). Beliefs and experiences in hoarding. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steketee, G., & Frost, R. O. (2013). Treatment for Hoarding Disorder: Therapist Guide (2nd edn). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
APA (2013). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Ayers, C. R., & Dozier, M. E. (2015). Predictors of hoarding severity in older adults with hoarding disorder. International Psychogeriatrics, 27, 1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratiotis, C. (2013). Community hoarding task forces: a comparative case study of five task forces in the United States. Health and Social Care in the Community, 21, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, R. K., Sergeant, J. F., Landry, S. T., Koenig, T., Leiste, M., & Reynolds, K. (2010). Hoarding cases involving older adults: the transition from a private matter to the public sector. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R. O., & Hartl, T. L. (1996). A cognitive-behavioral model of compulsive hoarding. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 34, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, R. O., Steketee, G., & Williams, L. (2000). Hoarding: a community health problem. Health & Social Care in the Community, 8, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, O. M., Salkovskis, P. M., & Oldfield, V. B. (2013). Beliefs and experiences in hoarding. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, T. L., Leiste, M. R., Spano, R., & Chapin, R. (2013). Multidisciplinary team perspectives on older adult hoarding and mental illness. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 25, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2010). Focus group interviewing. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 3, 378–403.Google Scholar
Kwok, N., Bratiotis, C., Luu, M., Lauster, N., Kysow, K., & Wood, S. R. (2018). Examining the role of fire prevention on hoarding response teams: Vancouver fire and rescue services as a case study. Fire Technology, 54, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kysow, K., Bratiotis, C., Lauster, N., & Woody, S. R. (2020). How can cities tackle hoarding? Examining an intervention program bringing together fire and health authorities in Vancouver. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28, 1160–1169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lincolnshire Safeguarding Adults Board (2020). Lincolnshire Multi-Agency Hoarding Protocol, https://www.lincolnshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/4700/lincolnshire-multi-agency-hoarding-protocol (accessed 11 April 2022).Google Scholar
McGuire, J. F., Kaercher, L., Park, J. M., & Storch, E. A. (2013). Hoarding in the community: a code enforcement and social service perspective. Journal of Social Service Research, 39, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NHS Health Research Authority (2013). Defining Research, http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2013/09/defining-research.pdf (accessed 11 April 2022).Google Scholar
Postlethwaite, A., Kellett, A., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2019). Prevalence of hoarding disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seaman, C., Oldfield, V. B., Gordon, O., Forrester, E., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2010). The impact of symptomatic hoarding in OCD and its treatment. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slough Borough Council (2021). Hoarding protocol, https://www.slough.gov.uk/downloads/file/1876/hoarding-protocol (accessed 11 April 2022).Google Scholar
Steketee, G., Frost, R. O., & Kim, H. J. (2001). Hoarding by elderly people. Health & Social Work, 26, 176–184.Google Scholar
Thew, G. R., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2016). Hoarding among older people: an evaluative review. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 9, E32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolin, D. F., Meunier, S. A., Frost, R. O., & Steketee, G. (2010). Course of compulsive hoarding and its relationship to life events. Depression & Anxiety, 27, 829–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.