Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T02:52:38.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living with risk: Retired couples’ experiences of a financialised retirement income system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Siobhan Austen ,
Ray Broomhill ,
Monica Costa  and
Rhonda Sharp
Siobhan Austen*
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Australia
Ray Broomhill
Affiliation:
University of Adelaide, Australia
Monica Costa
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Australia
Rhonda Sharp
Affiliation:
University of South Australia, Australia
*
Siobhan Austen, Department of Economics, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. Email: siobhan.austen@cbs.curtin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents new data on the nature and consequences of the risks for retirees inherent in the Australian retirement income system. This system can be regarded as ‘financialised’ in that retirement savings are primarily managed by non-government financial institutions and, although the Age Pension remains as a safety net, responsibility for the provision and management of retirement incomes has increasingly shifted to individuals. In this article we report the results of a qualitative study of older mixed-sex couple households’ experiences of this system and discuss the implications for retirement incomes policy. We conclude that while the system of government-mandated employer superannuation contributions (the Superannuation Guarantee) is undoubtedly raising the living standard of many older Australians, the financialised nature of the retirement income system, as a whole, poses significant financial risks for many retirees.

Keywords

H31H55J18Australiafinancialisationqualitative methodsretirement
Type
Original Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 737 - 753
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) (2019) ASFA Retirement Standard: Detailed budget breakdowns. Available at: https://www.superannuation.asn.au/ArticleDocuments/269/ASFA-RetirementStandard-Budgets-Sep2019.pdf.aspx?Embed=Y (accessed 13 December 2021).Google Scholar
Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) (2022) Superannuation statistics, June. Available at: https://www.superannuation.asn.au/resources/superannuation-statistics (accessed 4 July 2022).Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2018–19) Retirement, retirement intensions, Australia. Table 3.1 Characteristics of retirees. Canberra: ABS Cat no 6238.0. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/methodologies/retirement-and-retirement-intentions-australia-methodology/2018-19 (accessed 28 July 2022).Google Scholar
Australian Government (2019) Royal Commission Into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, vol. 1. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) (2022) APRA releases superannuation statistics for June 2022. APRA, 23 August. Available at: https://www.apra.gov.au/news-and-publications/apra-releases-superannuation-statistics-for-june-2022 (accessed 11 October 2022).Google Scholar
Bagshaw, EI (2019) I misread franking credits, says Shorten of election loss. Sydney Morning Herald, 6 October 2019. Available at: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/shorten-i-misread-franking-credits-20191006-p52y29.html (accessed 10 August 2022).Google Scholar
Borowski, A (2013) Risky by design: The mandatory private pillar of Australia’s retirement income system. Social Policy and Administration 47(6): 749–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, SM, Weaver, RK (2005) Lashed to the mast? The politics of notional defined contribution pension reforms. Working Papers, 2004–5. Boston, MA: Center for Retirement Research, Boston College.Google Scholar
Broomhill, R, Costa, M, Austen, S , et al. (2021) What went wrong with super? Financialisation and Australia’s retirement income. Journal of Australian Political Economy 87: 71–94.Google Scholar
Broomhill, R, Sharp, R (2007) The problem of social reproduction under neoliberalism: Reconfiguring the male breadwinner model in Australia. In: Griffin-Cohen, M, Brodie, J (eds) Remapping Gender in the New Global Order. London: Routledge, pp. 85–108.Google Scholar
Bryan, D, Rafferty, M (2017) The financial responsibilities of our grandparents: Towards a political economy of pension restructuring. In: Skerrett, K, Weststar, J, Archer, S , et al. (eds) The Contradictions of Pension Fund Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR) (2018) Retirement income in Australia: Part 1 – Overview. Available at: http://cepar.edu.au/sites/default/files/retirement-income-in-australia-part1.pdf (accessed 7 May 2020).Google Scholar
Clark, G (2000) Pension Fund Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Combet, G (2020) Greg Combet’s 2020s vision: We should increase superannuation without delay. The Guardian, 1 February. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/01/greg-combets-2020s-vision-we-should-increase-superannuation-without-delay (accessed 11 October 2022).Google Scholar
Daley, J, Coates, B (2018) Money in retirement: More than enough. November. Melbourne, Australia: Grattan Institute. Available at: https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/912-Money-in-retirement-re-issue-1.pdf (accessed 10 October 2022).Google Scholar
De Deken, J (2017) The challenges posed by the unintended universal financialization of retirement provision. In: Natali, D (ed.) The New Pension Mix in Europe: Recent Reforms, the Distributional Effects and Political Dynamics. Brussels, Belgium: PIE Peter Lang SA, pp. 145–176.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B (2015) The privatization and marketization of pensions in Europe: A double transformation facing the crisis. European Policy Analysis 1(1): 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallery, G, Brown, K, Gallery, N (1996) Privatising the pension. Journal of Australian Political Economy 38: 98–124.Google Scholar
Hillig, A (2019) Everyday financialization: The case of UK households. Economy and Space 51(7): 1460–1478.Google Scholar
Mees, B (2020) Risk shifting and the decline of defined benefit pension schemes in Australia. Accounting History Review 30(1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer (2020) Submission to the 2019–20 retirement income review. Available at: https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-02/mercer030220.pdf (accessed 26 August 2020).Google Scholar
Mills, JE, Franzway, S, Gill, J , et al. (2014) Challenging Knowledge, Sex and Power: Gender, Work and Engineering. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Natali, D (ed.) (2017) The New Pension Mix in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: PIE Peter Lang SA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsberg, D (2003) Women, ageing and retirement challenges and long term strategies. Submission to the Standing Committee on Ageing Inquiry into Long Term Strategies to Address the Ageing of the Australian Population. Submission 6. Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Former_Committees/superannuation/completed_inquiries/2002-04/retirement/submissions/sublist (accessed 10 October 2022).Google Scholar
Orenstein, MA (2003) Mapping the diffusion of pension innovation. In: Holzmann, R, Orenstein, MA, Rutkowski, M (eds) Pension Reform in Europe: Process and Progress. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 171–192.Google Scholar
Pellandini-Simányi, L (2021) The financialization of everyday life. In: Borch, C, Wosnitzer, T (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Finance Studies. New York, NY and London: Routledge, pp. 278–299.Google Scholar
Sharp, R (1992) The rise and rise of occupational superannuation under Labor. Journal of Australian Political Economy 30: 24–41.Google Scholar
Van der Zwan, N (2014) Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review 12(1): 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Women in Super (2022) Women in super policy framework. Submission to Senate Select Committee on Work and Care. September. Available at: https://www.womeninsuper.com.au/content/submissions-and-discussion-papers/gjut60 (accessed 26 October 2022).Google Scholar