Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T10:01:24.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telework potential in the Philippines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Ammielou Gaduena ,
Christopher Ed Caboverde  and
John Paul Flaminiano
Ammielou Gaduena*
Affiliation:
Asian Institute of Management, Philippines
Christopher Ed Caboverde
Affiliation:
Asian Institute of Management, Philippines
John Paul Flaminiano
Affiliation:
Asian Institute of Management, Philippines
*
Ammielou Gaduena, Rizalino S. Navarro Policy Center for Competitiveness, Asian Institute of Management, 123 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City 1229, Philippines. Email: agaduena@aim.edu; aqgaduena@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using work from home (WFH) scores obtained by matching Philippine occupations with U.S. O*NET occupations, this paper estimates that only 12.38% of all workers can WFH and 25.7% of Philippine occupations are teleworkable––mostly from the following occupational groups: professionals, clerical support workers, and technicians and associate professionals. The education, real estate and, professional, scientific and technical sectors account for the largest share of teleworkable jobs. Those workers belonging to lower per capita income deciles, who are male, who have lower levels of education, who are self-employed, aged 55 and older, and who are working in sectors such as agriculture and retail, are also less likely to be in teleworkable occupations.

Keywords

COVID-19labour marketPhilippinesteleworkJ240J280
Type
Industry, skills and investment
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 434 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad, R (2020) ‘Work from home’ trend climbs amid quarantine, study confirms. Business World, 28 April. Available at: https://businessmirror.com.ph/2020/04/28/work-from-home-trend-climbs-amid-quarantine-study-confirms/ (accessed 9 September 2020).Google Scholar
Asian Institute of Management Rizalino S. Navarro Policy Center for Competitiveness [AIM RSN PCC] (2020) Rethink Work Arrangements. Telework Potential in the Philippines. Policy Forum Note no. 2020-06, 21 October. Makati City, Philippines: AIM Rizalino S. Navarro Policy Center for Competitiveness.Google Scholar
Berg, J, Bonnet, F, Soares, S (2020) Working from Home: Estimating the Worldwide Potential. Policy Brief. April. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Boeri, T, Caiumi, A, Paccagnella, M (2020) Mitigating the work-safety trade-off. Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers 2: 60–67.Google Scholar
Clapano, J (2020) Canteens, smoking areas pose highest risk for workplace infection. Philippine Star, 7 August. Available at: https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2020/08/07/2033476/canteens-smoking-areas-pose-highest-risk-workplace-infection (accessed 18 August 2020).Google Scholar
Department of Labor and Employment [DOLE] (2014) Tripartite industrial peace council. Available at: https://blr.dole.gov.ph/2014/12/11/tripartite-industrial-peace-council/ (accessed 7 September 2021).Google Scholar
Dingel, J, Neiman, B (2020) How Many Jobs can be Done at Home? Working Paper no. 26948, 19 June. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eurofound (2021) COVID-19: Implications for employment and working life. COVID-19 series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2021/covid-19-implications-for-employment-and-working-life (accessed 1 September 2021).Google Scholar
Eurofound and International Labour Office [ILO] (2017) Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union and Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office. Available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1658en.pdf (accessed 1 September 2021).Google Scholar
Francisco, J, Flores, S, Canare, T, et al. (2019) Mapping Philippine workers at risk of automation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Working Paper no. 2019–001, 22 April Makati City, Philippines: AIM Rizalino S. Navarro Policy Center for Competitiveness.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foschiatti, CB, Gasparini, L (2020) El impacto Asimétrico de la Cuarentena: Estimaciones en Base a una Caracterización de Ocupaciones. Working Paper no. 261, April. La. Plata, Argentina: CEDLAS-Universidad Nacional de la Plata.Google Scholar
Frey, CB, Osborne, MA (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114: 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Generalao, INA (2021) Measuring the telework potential of jobs: evidence from the international standard classification of occupations. Philippine Review of Economics 58(1,2): 92–127.Google Scholar
Gratton, L (2021) How to do hybrid right. Harvard Business Review. May-June 2021. Available at: https://hbr.org/2021/05/how-to-do-hybrid-right (accessed 28 July 2021).Google Scholar
Guntin, R (2020) Trabajo a distancia y con contacto en uruguay. Available at: http://www.rguntin.com/research/employment_uru_covid_new.pdf (accessed 3 August 2020).Google Scholar
Hatayama, M, Viollaz, M, Winkler, H (2020) Jobs’ amenability to working from home: Evidence from skills survey for 53 countries. In: Policy Research Working Paper no. 9241. Washington DC: MayWorld Bank.Google Scholar
Holgersen, H, Jia, Z, Svenkerud, S (2020) Who and How Many can Work from Home in Norway? Evidence from Task Descriptions. Discussion Paper no. 935, June. Oslo, Norway: Statistics Norway Research Department.Google Scholar
Hosoda, M (2021) Telework amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on work style reform in Japan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 21(6): 1059–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Management Development [IMD] (2020) 2020 World Competitiveness Yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Institute for Management Development.Google Scholar
International Labour Organization [ILO] (2020a) An employers’ guide on working from home in response to the outbreak of COVID-19. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---act_emp/documents/publication/wcms_745024.pdf (accessed 31 August 2021).Google Scholar
International Labour Organization [ILO] (2020b) Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A practical guide . Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_751232.pdf (accessed 7 September 2021).Google Scholar
Kabiling, G (2020) Duterte affirms PH’s commitment to UN goals despite COVID-19, recession. Manila Bulletin, 23 September. Available at: https://mb.com.ph/2020/09/23/duterte-affirms-phs-commitment-to-un-goals-despite-covid-19-recession/ (accessed 28 September 2020).Google Scholar
Lan, FY, Wei, CF, Hsu, YT, et al. (2020) Work-related COVID-19 transmission in six Asian countries/areas: a follow-up study. Plos One 15(5): e0233588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, PS (2020) O potencial de teletrabalho em Portugal. Observador, 27 March. Available at: https://observador.pt/especiais/o-potencial-do-teletrabalho-em-portugal/ (accessed 3 August 2020).Google Scholar
Mendez, C (2020) Canteens, common smoking areas in offices for now; eating, talking together discouraged. One News, 11 August. Available at: https://onenews.ph/galit-galit-muna-no-canteens-common-smoking-areas-in-offices-for-now-eating-talking-together-discouraged (accessed 17 August 2020).Google Scholar
Parreño-de Guzman, L, Zamora, O, Bernardo, D (2015) Diversified and integrate farming systems (DIFS): Philippine experiences for improved livelihood and nutrition. Journal of Development in Sustainable Agriculture 10(1): 19–33.Google Scholar
Partridge, J (2020) UK office workers slower to return to their desk after Covid. The Guardian, 5 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/aug/05/uk-office-workers-slower-to-return-to-their-desk-after-covid (accessed 17 August 2020).Google Scholar
Philippine Institute for Development Studies [PIDS] (2020) Navigating the new globalization: Local actions for global challenges. Available at: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publications/7101 (accessed 6 September 2020).Google Scholar
Philippine Statistics Authority [PSA] (2016) 2015 Philippine family income and expenditure survey [raw dataset requested from PSA by AIM RSN PCC team.Google Scholar
Philippine Statistics Authority [PSA] (2017) 2016 first quarter labour force survey [raw dataset requested from PSA by AIM RSN PCC team].Google Scholar
Republic of the Philippines (2018). Republic Act No 11165. Official Gazette, 20 December. Available at: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2018/12/20/republic-act-no-11165/ (accessed 6 December 2021).Google Scholar
Schmitz, A, Moss, C (2015) Mechanised agriculture: machine adoption, farm size, and labor displacement. Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management & Economics 18(3): 278–296.Google Scholar