Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T09:44:44.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Growth of Seedlings and Plants Grown from Root Pieces of Yellow Toadflax (Linaria vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Léonie B. Nadeau
Affiliation:
Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P5
Jane R. King
Affiliation:
Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P5
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
Lacombe Res. Stn., Bag Service 5000, Lacombe, Alberta, T0C 1S0

Abstract

Different growth rates of young seedlings (genets) and plants grown from root pieces (ramets) of yellow toadflax could influence their respective competitive ability and their susceptibility to management techniques. Shoot production was similar for genets and ramets (approximately 10 shoots were produced 12 or 13 wk after transplanting or cotyledon appearance, respectively), but the rate of shoot biomass accumulation was higher for genets than for ramets. Genets consistently produced more underground shoots than ramets. Replanted underground shoots separated from their roots were able to produce new shoots and roots. Rate of elongation for roots 0.5 to 1.5 mm in diameter was higher for ramets than for genets, but their shoot production potential was the same. Root pieces from genets did not have the ability to produce daughter shoots until 3 wk after cotyledon appearance. This indicates that very young genets would be more susceptible than older genets or ramets to management control systems.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bakshi, T. S. and Coupland, R. T. 1960. Vegetative propagation in Linaria vulgaris . Can. J. Bot. 38:243249.Google Scholar
2. Broderick, D. M. 1990. The biology of Canadian weeds. 93. Epilobium angustifolium L. (Onagraceae). Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:247260.Google Scholar
3. Charlton, W. A. 1962. The underground system of Linaria vulgaris Mill. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. 65 pp.Google Scholar
4. Environment Canada. 1982a. Canadian Climate Normals. 1951–1980. Temperature and Precipitation, Prairie Provinces. Page 62. CIDC: 551.582. Canadian Climate Program, Ottawa.Google Scholar
5. Environment Canada. 1982b. Canadian Climate Normals. 1951–1980. Vol. 1. Solar Radiation. Page 2. UDC:551.521.12. Canadian Climate Program, Ottawa.Google Scholar
6. Gutterman, Y. 1985. Flowering, seed development, and the influences during seed maturation on seed germination of annual weeds. Pages 125 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. I. Reproduction and Ecophysiology. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
7. Hamdoun, A. M. 1970. The effects of different levels of nitrogen upon Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. plants grown from seeds and root fragments. Weed Res. 10:121125.Google Scholar
8. Lemna, W. K. and Messersmith, C. G. 1990. The biology of Canadian Weeds. 94. Sonchus arvensis . Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:509532.Google Scholar
9. Nadeau, L. B., Dale, M.R.T., and King, J. R. 1991. The development of spatial pattern in shoots of Linaria vulgaris (Schrophulariaceae) growing on fallow land or in a barley crop. Can. J. Bot. 69 (in press).Google Scholar
10. Nadeau, L. B. and King, J. R. 1991. Seed dispersal and seedling establishment of Linaria vulgaris Mill. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:771782.Google Scholar
11. Williams, E. D. 1973. A comparison of the growth and competition behaviour of seedlings and plants from rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. and Agrostis gigantea Roth. Weed Res. 13:422429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Werner, P. A. and Rioux, R. 1977. The biology of Canadian weeds. 24. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:905919.Google Scholar