Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T13:02:51.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution of Conyza sp. in Orchards of California and Response to Glyphosate and Paraquat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Marcelo L. Moretti*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences MS4, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Lynn M. Sosnoskie
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences MS4, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Anil Shrestha
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, California State University, 2415 E. San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA 93740
Steven D. Wright
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, 4437 S. Laspina St., Tulare, CA 93274
Kurt J. Hembree
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, 550 E. Shaw Avenue, Suite 210-B, Fresno, CA 93710
Marie Jasieniuk
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences MS4, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Bradley D. Hanson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences MS4, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mlmoretti@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

Resistance to glyphosate in hairy fleabane and horseweed is a problem in orchards and vineyards in California. Population genetic analyses suggest that glyphosate resistance evolved multiple times in both species, but it is unknown if resistance to other herbicides is also present. Two approaches of research were undertaken to further evaluate herbicide resistance in Conyza sp. in the perennial crop systems of California. In the initial study, the distribution of Conyza sp. in the Central Valley, using a semistructured field survey, was coupled with evaluation of the presence and level of glyphosate resistance in plants grown from field-collected seed. In a subsequent study, single-seed descendants representing distinct genetic groups were self-pollinated in the greenhouse and these accessions were evaluated for response to glyphosate and paraquat. Conyza sp. were commonly found throughout the Central Valley and glyphosate-resistant individuals were confirmed in all field collections of both species. The level of glyphosate resistance among field collections varied from 5- to 21-fold compared with 50% glyphosate resistance (GR50) of the susceptible, with exception of one region with a GR50 similar to the susceptible. When self-pollinated accessions from different genetic groups were screened, the level of glyphosate resistance, on the basis of GR50 values, ranged from 1.7- to 42.5-fold in hairy fleabane, and 5.9- to 40.3-fold in horseweed. Three accessions of hairy fleabane from different genetic groups were also resistant to paraquat (40.1- to 352.5-fold). One glyphosate-resistant horseweed accession was resistant to paraquat (322.8-fold), which is the first confirmed case in California. All paraquat-resistant accessions of Conyza sp. identified so far have also been resistant to glyphosate, probably because glyphosate resistance is already widespread in the state. Because glyphosate and paraquat resistances are found across a wide geographical range and in accessions from distinct genetic groups, multiple resistant Conyza sp. likely developed independently several times in California.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Vijay Nandula, Mississippi State University.

References

Literature Cited

[CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture (2015) California Agricultural Production Statistics. http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/statistics/. Accessed April 26, 2015Google Scholar
[CDPR] California Department of Pesticide Regulation (2013) Summary of Pesticide Use Report Data. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov. Accessed April 20, 2015Google Scholar
Délye, C, Jasieniuk, M, Le Corre, V (2013) Deciphering the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Trends Genet 29:649658 Google Scholar
Eubank, TW, Nandula, VK, Poston, DH, Shaw, DR (2012) Multiple resistance of horseweed to glyphosate and paraquat and its control with paraquat and metribuzin combinations. Agronomy 2:358370 Google Scholar
Ge, X, d'Avignon, DA, Ackerman, JJH, Duncan, B, Spaur, MB, Sammons, RD (2011) Glyphosate resistant horseweed made sensitive to glyphosate: low temperature suppression of glyphosate vacuolar sequestration revealed by 31P NMR. Pest Manag Sci 67:12151221 Google Scholar
Gressel, J (2009) Evolving understanding of the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 65:11641173 Google Scholar
Hanson, BD, Shrestha, A, Shaner, DL (2009) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) and relationship to cropping systems in the Central Valley of California. Weed Sci 57:4853 Google Scholar
Kahle, D, Wickham, H, Kahle, MD, Suggests, M (2013) Package ‘ggmap’. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggmap/index.html. Accessed April 6, 2015Google Scholar
McCullagh, P, Nelder, JA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. 2nd edn. London Chapman & Hall. p 511 Google Scholar
Moretti, ML, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Shrestha, A (2013) Glyphosate resistance is more variable than paraquat resistance in a multiple-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) population. Weed Sci 61:396402 Google Scholar
Moretti, ML, Shrestha, A, Hembree, KJ, Hanson, BD (2015) Postemergence control of glyphosate/paraquat-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in tree nut orchards in the Central Valley of California. Weed Technol 29:501508 Google Scholar
Okada, M, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Peng, Y, Shrestha, A, Stewart, CN, Wright, SD, Jasieniuk, M (2013) Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis in California. Evol Appl 6:761777 Google Scholar
Okada, M, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ, Peng, Y, Shrestha, A, Stewart, CN, Wright, SD, Jasieniuk, M (2014) Evolution and spread of glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis in California and a comparison with closely related Conyza canadensis . Weed Res 55:173184 Google Scholar
Okada, M, Jasieniuk, M (2014) Inheritance of glyphosate resistance in hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) from California. Weed Sci 62:258266 Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2015) The R Project for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed June 29, 2015Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Strebig, J, Ritz, MC (2015) Package ‘drc’. http://www.bioassay.dk. Accessed May 16, 2015Google Scholar
Sammons, RD, Gaines, TA (2014) Glyphosate resistance: state of knowledge. Pest Manag Sci 70:13671377 Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, Hanson, BD, Hembree, KJ (2008a) Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane documented in the Central Valley. Calif Agric 62:116119 Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, Hembree, KJ, Va, N (2007) Growth stage influences level of resistance in glyphosate-resistant horseweed. Calif Agric 61:6770 Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, Hembree, KJ, Wright, SD (2008b) Biology and management of horseweed and hairy fleabane in California. University of California Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources Pub 8314. 9 pGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, A, Steinhauer, KM, Moretti, ML, Hanson, BD, Jasieniuk, M, Hembree, KJ, Wright, SD (2014) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in central California and their phenological development. J Pest Sci 87:201209 Google Scholar
VanGessel, M (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703705 Google Scholar
Walker, S, Bell, K, Robinson, G, Widderick, M (2011) Flaxleaf fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) populations have developed glyphosate resistance in north-east Australian cropping fields. Crop Prot 30:311317 Google Scholar
Yuan, JS, Abercrombie, LLG, Cao, Y, Halfhill, MD, Zhou, X, Peng, Y, Hu, J, Rao, MR, Heck, GR, Larosa, TJ, Sammons, RD, Wang, X, Ranjan, P, Johnson, DH, Wadl, PA, Scheffler, BE, Rinehart, TA, Trigiano, RN, Stewart, CN Jr. (2010) Functional genomics analysis of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with special reference to the evolution of non–target-site glyphosate resistance. Weed Sci 58:109117 Google Scholar