Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T11:15:27.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal changes in annual bluegrass (Poa annua) germinability and emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven A. Fennimore
Affiliation:
Department of Vegetable Crops, University of California–Davis, 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905

Abstract

The seasonal emergence characteristics and seedbank ecology of annual bluegrass were evaluated in a vegetable field in the central coast of California. The emergence and germinability of annual bluegrass were monitored continuously for over 3 yr to detect seasonal variation in weed emergence. Weed emergence and seedbank densities were measured every 45 d for 41 mo. Weed emergence was monitored simultaneously in the field and in a growth chamber that was adjusted seasonally for day length and temperature. Samples were incubated in the growth chamber for 45 d and then elutriated to measure remaining viable ungerminated caryopses and relative germination potential. Seedbank densities ranged from 2,000 to 20,000 caryopses m−2 during the study period. Weed emergence and germinability were highest from October to November and lowest from March to July. Emergence from soils collected in the spring and fall and incubated under both spring and fall conditions in the growth chamber indicated that seed dormancy state determines germinability rather than environmental conditions during incubation. Soil samples collected in the spring had no emergence (<1%) when incubated under spring or fall conditions, whereas samples collected in the fall had high emergence (>95%) under both spring and fall conditions. A waveform regression fit the repeated emergence pattern with a cycle length of 364 d (365 d for the growth chamber). This model predicted that weed emergence would peak on November 5 and be lowest on June 20. A survey of organic vegetable fields found that caryopses were more common in soils with higher clay content than in lighter soils (R2 = 0.77, P = 0.02). Our data suggest that annual bluegrass is more likely to emerge when the soil is wet during winter. The timing and location of annual bluegrass emergence may increase the probability of reproductive success during periods when seasonal rains and wet conditions limit tillage, weeding activities, and competition with other weeds.

Type
Weed Biology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andreasen, A., Streibig, J. C., and Hass, H. 1991. Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Res 31:181188.Google Scholar
Arocha, L. O., Blazich, F. A., Warren, S. L, Thetford, M., and Berry, J. B. 1999. Seed germination of Rhododendron chapmanii: influence of light and temperature. J. Environ. Hortic 17:193196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1989. A comparison of techniques for estimation of arable soil seedbanks and their relationship to weed flora. Weed Res 29:365373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 68, 145, 149, 190, 386, 393.Google Scholar
Battista, M. 1998. Predicting Weeds in Time and Space from Seedbank and Seedling Measurements. . University of California, Davis, CA. pp. 3738.Google Scholar
Bergelson, J. 1990. Life after death: site pre-emption by the remains of Poa annua. Ecology 71:21572165.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1967. Photoperiodic control of germination. Pages 147154 in Boriss, H., ed. Physiology, Ecology, and Biochemistry of Germination. Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Botanical Institute of the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University of Greifswald. Greifswald, Germany: Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University.Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, H. J. and Karssen, C. M. 1992. The dual role of temperature in the regulation of seasonal changes in dormancy and germination of seeds of Polygonum persicaria L. Oecologia 90:8894.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., and Forcella, F. 1997. Implications of weed seedbanks to weed management. Weed Sci 45:329336.Google Scholar
Cavers, P. B. 1995. Seedbank: memory in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci 75:1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, T. D. 1978. Soil Survey of Monterey County, California. Washington, DC: USDA, US Forest Service and University of California Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Bell, C. E., Smith, R. H., Lanini, W. T., LeStrange, M., Fennimore, S. A., and Bendixen, W. E. 2002a. Weeds. University of California, Pest Management Guidelines: Lettuce. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication No. 3450. Available at: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/. Accessed July 2002.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Smith, R. F., Fennimore, S. A., Schrader, W. L., and Mullen, B. J. 2002b. Weeds. University of California, Pest Management Guidelines: Artichoke. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication No. 3434. Available at: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/. Accessed July 2002.Google Scholar
Densmore, R. V. 1997. Effect of day length on germination of seeds collected in Alaska. Am. J. Bot 84:274278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieleman, J. A., Mortensen, D. A., Buhler, D. D., Cambardella, C. A., and Moorman, T. B. 2000a. Identifying associates among site properties and weed species abundance. I. Multivariate analysis. Weed Sci 48:567575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieleman, J. A., Mortensen, D. A., and Young, L. J. 2000b. Predicting within field weed species occurrence based on field site attributes. Pages 517528 in Stafford, J. V., ed. Second European Conference on Precision Agriculture; July 11–15, 1999; Odense, Denmark. Sheffield, U.K.: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dyer, W. E. 1995. Exploiting weed seed dormancy and germination requirements through agronomic practices. Weed Sci 43:498503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennimore, S. A. and Crabb, C. B. 1999. Seasonal weed emergence in California vegetable fields. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 39:141.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A. and Shem-Tov, S. 2002. Seasonal variations in the germinable fraction of soil seedbanks in California. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 42:82.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A., Smith, R. F., and McGiffen, M. E. Jr. 2001. Weed management in fresh market spinach with S-metolachlor. Weed Technol 15:511516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, G. R., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. 1992. Weed seedbanks of the U.S. corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci 40:636644.Google Scholar
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. 1982. Particle-size analysis. Pages 383411 in Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. ASA Monograph Number 9. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, K. L. and Renner, K. A. 1989. A new method for estimating seed number in the soil. Weed Sci 37:836839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honek, A., Martinkova, Z., and Jarosik, V. 1999. Annual cycles of germinability and differences between primary and secondary dormancy in buried seeds of Echinochloa crus-galli. Weed Res 39:6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N. E. 1998. The number of soil cores required to accurately estimate the seedbank on arable land. In Champion, G. T., Grundy, A. C., Jones, N. E., Marshall, E.J.P., and Froud-Williams, R. J., eds. Weed Seedbanks: Determination Dynamics and Manipulation. Warwick, U.K.: Association of Applied Biologists.Google Scholar
Lanini, W. T., Bell, C. E., Smith, R. F., LeStrange, M., and Cudney, D. W. 2002. Weeds. University of California, Pest Management Guidelines: Cole Crops. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication No. 3442. Available at: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/.Google Scholar
Lush, W. M. 1989. Adaptation and differentiation of golf course populations of annual bluegrass Poa annua. Weed Sci 37:5459.Google Scholar
Malone, C. R. 1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in the soil. Weeds 15:381382.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. E. L. and Abdalla, A. F. 1982. Variation in germination behavior. Seed Sci. Technol 10:6776.Google Scholar
Noe, G. B. and Zedler, J. B. 2000. Differential effects of four abiotic factors on the germination of salt marsh annuals. Am. J. Bot 87:16791692.Google Scholar
Oryokot, J. O. E., Thomas, A. G., and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Temperature- and moisture-dependent models of seed germination and shoot elongation in green and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus powellii, A. retroflexus). Weed Sci 45:488496.Google Scholar
Peachey, R. E., Pinkerton, J. N., Ivors, K. L., Miller, M. L., and Moore, L. W. 2001. Effect of soil solarization, cover crops, and metham on field emergence and survival of buried annual bluegrass (Poa annua) seeds. Weed Technol 15:8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1973. Changes in the numbers of viable weed seeds in soil under different regimes. Weed Res 13:298303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Stokes, F. G. 1965. Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. V. Final observation on an experiment with different primary cultivations. J. Appl. Ecol 2:307315.Google Scholar
Ryder, E. J. 1999. Crop Production Science in Horticulture 9. Lettuce, Endive and Chicory. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing. pp. 7989.Google Scholar
Shem-Tov, S. and Fennimore, S. A. 2002. Seasonal variation in weed emergence densities in California vegetable fields. Weed Sci. Soc. Am 42:82.Google Scholar
Shumway, R. H. and Stoffer, D. S. 2000. Time series analysis and its applications. New York: Springer. pp. 1212.Google Scholar
Smith, R. F., Bendixen, W. E., and Fennimore, S. A. 2002. Weeds. University of California, Pest Management Guide Lines: Strawberry. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication No. 3468. Available at: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu.Google Scholar
Standifer, L. C. and Wilson, P. W. 1988a. A high temperature requirement for after ripening of imbibed dormant Poa annua L. seeds. Weed Res 28:365371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standifer, L. C. and Wilson, P. W. 1988b. Dormancy studies in three populations of Poa annua L. seeds. Weed Res 28:359363.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1970. Changes in dormancy and variability of weed seeds in soil. Weed Sci 18:265269.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1972. Phytochrome controlled changes in dormancy and germination of buried weed seeds. Weed Sci 20:417422.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. and Whatley, J. C. 1984. A thermogradient bar apparatus for the study of the germination requirements of buried seeds in situ. New Phytol 96:459471.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. 1979. The biology of Canadian weeds. 37. Poa annua L. Can. J. Plant Sci 59:10531066.Google Scholar
Wu, L., Till-Bottraud, I., and Torres, A. 1987. Genetic differentiation in temperature-enforced seed dormancy among golf course populations of Poa annua L. New Phytol 107:623631.Google Scholar