Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:51:13.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed burial by tillage promotes field recruitment of false cleavers (Galium spurium) and catchweed bedstraw (Galium aparine)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Danielle J. Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada

Abstract

False cleavers and catchweed bedstraw are problematic weeds of field crops in high-latitude regions of the northern Great Plains of North America. The abundance of these species has been increasing in areas of greater tillage intensity and frequency. Field experiments were established over 4 site-yr in Manitoba, Canada, and results indicated that the recruitment of false cleavers and catchweed bedstraw was strongly promoted by a single shallow tillage operation with a sweep cultivator in the spring. Percent recruitment levels in 2001 (pooled over sites) were 17 and 46% for the untilled and tilled treatments, respectively. In 2002, the percent recruitment levels for the untilled and tilled treatments, respectively, were 28 and 38% for the Komarno site and 13 and 28% for the Petersfield site. Only a few and minor differences in microsite conditions (soil temperature, soil moisture, and bulk density) resulted from the single spring tillage pass. The single tillage pass caused a significant relocation of simulated seeds (plastic beads) to below the soil surface and deeper into the soil profile (2–4 cm). Mean bulk density and volumetric soil moisture increased significantly with soil depth. The results of this study suggest that the positive effect of tillage on cleavers recruitment was not due to the effect of tillage on microsite conditions per se. Rather, the vertical redistribution of seed by tillage moved these seeds to a place in which the microsite conditions differed from those on the surface and were more favorable for recruitment. False cleavers and catchweed bedstraw recruitment is clearly promoted by tillage (even minor tillage) under field conditions, and farmers might be able to limit recruitment by limiting spring tillage.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, P. S., White, D. B., and Markhart, A. H. III. 1993. Germination of perennial ryegrass and annual bluegrass seeds subjected to hydration-dehydration cycles. Crop Sci 33:10201025.Google Scholar
Arshad, M. A. and Azooz, R. H. 1996. Tillage effects on soil thermal properties in a semiarid cold region. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 60:561567.Google Scholar
Benvenuti, S., Macchia, M., and Miele, S. 2001. Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seeds with increasing soil depth. Weed Sci 49:528535.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. S. and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. The effects of depth and fluctuating soil moisture on the emergence of ten annual and six perennial weed species. Weed Sci 51:725730.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. S. and Van Acker, R. C. 2004. Seed and microsite limitation of the emergence levels of four annual weed species. Weed Sci 52:571577.Google Scholar
Bullied, W. J., Marginet, A. M., and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. Conventional- and conservation-tillage systems influence emergence periodicity of annual weed species in canola. Weed Sci 51:886897.Google Scholar
Charles, G. W., Blair, G. J., and Andrews, A. K. 1991. The effect of soil temperature, sowing depth and soil bulk density on the seedling emergence of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and white clover (Trifolium repens L). Aust. J. Agric. Res 42:12611269.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Moss, S. R. 1990. A model of the effects of cultivation on the vertical distribution of weed seeds in soil. Weed Res 30:6170.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Lafond, G. P., Thomas, A. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci 41:409417.Google Scholar
DuCroix Sissons, M. J., Van Acker, R. C., Derksen, D. A., and Thomas, A. G. 2000. Depth of seedling recruitment of five weed species measured in situ in conventional- and zero-tillage fields. Weed Sci 48:327332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F. 1992. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Res 32:2938.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J. 1985. The biology of cleavers (G. aparine). The biology and control of weeds in cereals. Asp. Appl. Biol 9:189195.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D. S. H. 1984. The effects of seed burial and soil disturbance on emergence and survival of arable weeds in relation to minimal cultivation. J. Appl. Ecol 21:629641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1998. The effect of light environment during tillage on the recruitment of various summer annuals. Weed Sci 46:214216.Google Scholar
Grundy, A. C. and Mead, A. 1998. Modeling the effects of seed depth on weed seedling emergence. Asp. Appl. Biol 51:7582.Google Scholar
Hall, L. M., Stromme, K. M., and Horsman, G. P. 1998. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitors and quinclorac in a biotype of false cleavers (Galium spurium). Weed Sci 46:390396.Google Scholar
Haluschak, P. 1987. Soil water holding capacities of selected Manitoba soils. Papers presented at the 30th Annual Manitoba Society of Soil Science Meeting January 6 and 7, 1987. Winnipeg, MB, Canada.Google Scholar
Kettler, T. A., Lyon, D. J., Doran, J. W., Powers, W. L., and Stroup, W. W. 2000. Soil quality assessment after weed-control tillage in a no-till wheat-fallow cropping system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 64:339346.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Andrews, T., Brown, K. R., and Van Acker, R. C. 2002a. Manitoba Weed Survey of Cereal and Oilseed Crops, 2002. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Weed Survey Series Publication 02-2. 191 p.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., and Brenzil, C. A. 2003. Saskatchewan Weed Survey of Cereal and Oilseed Crops in 2002. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Weed Survey Series Publication 03-1. 342 p.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., and Hall, L. M. 2002b. Alberta Weed Survey of Cereal and Oilseed Crops, 2001. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Weed Survey Series Publication 02-1. 263 p.Google Scholar
Malik, N. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1987a. False cleavers (G. spurium) competition and control in rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci 67:839844.Google Scholar
Malik, N. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1987b. Germination response of G. spurium L. to light. Weed Res 27:251258.Google Scholar
Malik, N. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 86. Galium aparine L. and G. spurium L. Can. J. Plant Sci 68:481499.Google Scholar
Menalled, F. D., Marino, P. C., Renner, K. A., and Landis, D. A. 2000. Post-dispersal weed seed predation in Michigan crop fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure. Agric. Ecosys. Environ 77:193202.Google Scholar
Pareja, M. R. and Staniforth, E. W. 1985. Seed–soil characteristics in relation to weed seed germination. Weed Sci 33:190195.Google Scholar
Potter, K. N., Cruse, R. M., and Horton, R. 1985. Tillage effects on soil thermal properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 49:968973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, L. E., Ehrlich, W. A., Leclaire, F. P., and Barr, J. A. 1961. Report of Detailed-Reconnaissance Soil Survey of Fisher Branch and Teulon Map Sheet Areas. Manitoba Soil Survey. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: The University of Manitoba, Canadian Department of Agriculture, Manitoba Department of Agriculture and Conservation Lands Branch, Manitoba Department of Mines and Natural Resources and Department of Soil Science Soils Report Report #12.Google Scholar
Reid, D. J. 2003. The impact of tillage intensity on the recruitment of false cleavers (Galium spurium L). . University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 144 p.Google Scholar
Reimer, A. and Shaykewich, C. F. 1980. Estimation of Manitoba soil temperatures from atmospheric meteorological measurements. Can. J. Soil Sci 60:299309.Google Scholar
Sjostedt, S. 1959. Germination biology of cleavers, G. aparine L. Plant Husb 10:87105.Google Scholar
Staricka, J. A., Burford, P. M., Allmaras, R. R., and Nelson, W. W. 1990. Tracing the vertical distribution of simulated shattered seeds as related to tillage. Agron. J 82:11311134.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C., Schirman, R. D., and Appleby, A. P. 1979. Influence of soil moisture, temperature and compaction on the germination and emergence of downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci 27:625630.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Frick, B. L., Van Acker, R. C., Knezevic, S. Z., and Jossee, D. 1998. Manitoba Weed Survey of Cereal and Oilseed Crops in 1997. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publication 98-1. 192 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Leeson, J. Y., and Van Acker, R. C. 1999. Farm Management Practices in Manitoba. 1997 Weed Survey Questionnaire Results. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Weed Survey Series Publication 99-3. 363 p.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. W. and Zhang, S. 1999. Tractor wheel traffic effects on weed emergence in Central Iowa. Weed Technol 13:741746.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Bullied, W. J., and du Croix Sissons, M. J. 2004. Tillage index predicts weed seedling recruitment depth. Can. J. Plant Sci 84:319326.Google Scholar
Vola, M. and Lloret, F. 2000. Seed dynamics of the mast seeding tussock grass Ampelodesmos mauritanica in Mediterranean shrublands. J. Ecol 88:479491.Google Scholar
Xu, D. and Mermoud, A. 2001. Topsoil properties as affected by tillage practices in North China. Soil Tillage Res 60:1119.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Pry, T. A., Durgan, B. P., and Wyse, D. L. 1996. Tillage effects on seed distribution and common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) establishment. Weed Sci 44:815820.Google Scholar